avatar
能连上wireless,但上不了网# Windows - 看得见风景的窗口
l*a
1
我一直都很喜欢腾格尔这个人,腾格尔的声音太迷人了,属于那种天生的无敌,这样的
嗓子不唱歌,那简直就是对天才无情的绞杀
以民族歌手出道,半路途中改成了通俗歌手,出了一首《梦随风飘》但是也很不错,词
曲都尚可,就是没红,后来就改成民族歌手,继续走艺术家的路线,这条路证明是走对
了,出了几首反应相当不多的好歌
再后来歌不怎么唱了,又跑去演什么电视剧电影,就没一个正道的人物,不是老大就是
屌丝,真有点想不明白了,这不就是自毁吗
不说了还是听听当年腾格尔的流行歌曲吧,这样的嗓子没有几个
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJG98IssvKg
这首歌是《梦随风飘》当年腾格尔用来打榜的歌曲
人类功勋永不休
爱恨绵绵多烦忧
花花世界依然充足
诉是红尘看破心中
千道相思为谁衷
万宗究竟为谁流
缠绵欢笑泪沽轻淌
鸳鸯梦徊聚短人长
我的爱在风中追
你的情在人里飞
为谁情狂情独锺
苦苦纠缠上心头
我的爱在风中追
你的情在人里飞
孤风吹醒一场梦
往事风飘一场空
人类功勋永不休
爱恨绵绵多烦忧
缠绵欢笑泪沽轻淌
鸳鸯梦徊聚短人长
鸳鸯梦徊聚短人长
avatar
z*e
2
谢谢。
avatar
j*9
3
The waterfall software development lifecycle consists of a sequence of steps
product maintenance. What are the issues with following such a model?
不知如何答起。谢谢。
avatar
z*1
4
信号也不错,very good or excellent.
但是为什么上不了网呢。
avatar
o*e
5
据说是被满人把持的媒体部门封杀了。当初北漂搞艺术的那么多,自杀的都几十个
avatar
t*n
6
emule上有N个版本

【在 z******e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢。
avatar
s*e
7
Just for your information: the waterfall approach tries to express all the
requirements before the development, which usually evolves over time as the
development progresses. It tries to define the design and all technologies
in the development up front, therefore can hardly accommodate any change. It
lacks the capacity of mastering complexity. This approach is good only for
simple system of short development duration, with few unknowns and risks.
For a complex system of long duration, with a lo

【在 j****9 的大作中提到】
: The waterfall software development lifecycle consists of a sequence of steps
: product maintenance. What are the issues with following such a model?
: 不知如何答起。谢谢。

avatar
l*a
8

这么说挺悲情的

【在 o****e 的大作中提到】
: 据说是被满人把持的媒体部门封杀了。当初北漂搞艺术的那么多,自杀的都几十个
avatar
j*9
9
thanks.
avatar
b*y
10
My opinion is the opposite, and might be wrong.
Waterfall should be used for critical and large systems because these
systems have to be well planned. For simple and small systems, it's more
flexible and volatile, so XP is more suitable.

the
It
for
it

【在 s***e 的大作中提到】
: Just for your information: the waterfall approach tries to express all the
: requirements before the development, which usually evolves over time as the
: development progresses. It tries to define the design and all technologies
: in the development up front, therefore can hardly accommodate any change. It
: lacks the capacity of mastering complexity. This approach is good only for
: simple system of short development duration, with few unknowns and risks.
: For a complex system of long duration, with a lo

avatar
n*g
11
the issue is you can follow those steps and imagine you are performing an
artistic creation when there's no boss yelling behind you

steps

【在 j****9 的大作中提到】
: The waterfall software development lifecycle consists of a sequence of steps
: product maintenance. What are the issues with following such a model?
: 不知如何答起。谢谢。

avatar
F*r
12
Design should come after requirement elicitation? I guess the major issue
is frequent changing requirement. Also late integration testing can be a
problem as well.
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。