f*h
2 楼
XML: data representation
HTML: data representation mixed with presentation
Both XML and HTML are a subset of SGML.
HTML + XML -> XHTML (HTML in XML syntax)
【在 vi 的大作中提到】
: 请高度概括一下，谢谢。
HTML: data representation mixed with presentation
Both XML and HTML are a subset of SGML.
HTML + XML -> XHTML (HTML in XML syntax)
【在 vi 的大作中提到】
: 请高度概括一下，谢谢。
w*n
3 楼
说到底其实没有什么区别.
XML 的特点用 HTML 也是可以实现的, 把 XML 用的简单一点儿和 HTML 几乎相同.
XML 和 HTML 主要是 major 不同:
就象小胖鱼说的:
XML major in data representation
HTML major in data presentation
【在 f*******h 的大作中提到】
: XML: data representation
: HTML: data representation mixed with presentation
: Both XML and HTML are a subset of SGML.
: HTML + XML -> XHTML (HTML in XML syntax)
XML 的特点用 HTML 也是可以实现的, 把 XML 用的简单一点儿和 HTML 几乎相同.
XML 和 HTML 主要是 major 不同:
就象小胖鱼说的:
XML major in data representation
HTML major in data presentation
【在 f*******h 的大作中提到】
: XML: data representation
: HTML: data representation mixed with presentation
: Both XML and HTML are a subset of SGML.
: HTML + XML -> XHTML (HTML in XML syntax)
vi
4 楼
Then why say 'Tomorrow Star of WWW (as the board name)'?
Why make up something sounds totally different rather then enhance HTML?
What is the relationship between XML and web services?
In other words, is XML essential for utilizing web services?
Thanks.
【在 w*********n 的大作中提到】
: 说到底其实没有什么区别.
: XML 的特点用 HTML 也是可以实现的, 把 XML 用的简单一点儿和 HTML 几乎相同.
: XML 和 HTML 主要是 major 不同:
: 就象小胖鱼说的:
: XML major in data representation
: HTML major in data presentation
Why make up something sounds totally different rather then enhance HTML?
What is the relationship between XML and web services?
In other words, is XML essential for utilizing web services?
Thanks.
【在 w*********n 的大作中提到】
: 说到底其实没有什么区别.
: XML 的特点用 HTML 也是可以实现的, 把 XML 用的简单一点儿和 HTML 几乎相同.
: XML 和 HTML 主要是 major 不同:
: 就象小胖鱼说的:
: XML major in data representation
: HTML major in data presentation
n*m
5 楼
XML and HTML is for totally different purpose.
HTML is for display on browers, and most likely that is its only working field
XML is for transfer data. Browers is only one for its usage
It is just a name. May be not quite suitable from some point of view
my 2 cent about this question is as above
No directly relationship. Web services is only one(quite popurlar field) for
XML
Definitely not. Actually, consier XML is dealt with data, it is more
closer to database instead of www browers.
Remember
【在 vi 的大作中提到】
: Then why say 'Tomorrow Star of WWW (as the board name)'?
: Why make up something sounds totally different rather then enhance HTML?
: What is the relationship between XML and web services?
: In other words, is XML essential for utilizing web services?
: Thanks.
HTML is for display on browers, and most likely that is its only working field
XML is for transfer data. Browers is only one for its usage
It is just a name. May be not quite suitable from some point of view
my 2 cent about this question is as above
No directly relationship. Web services is only one(quite popurlar field) for
XML
Definitely not. Actually, consier XML is dealt with data, it is more
closer to database instead of www browers.
Remember
【在 vi 的大作中提到】
: Then why say 'Tomorrow Star of WWW (as the board name)'?
: Why make up something sounds totally different rather then enhance HTML?
: What is the relationship between XML and web services?
: In other words, is XML essential for utilizing web services?
: Thanks.
f*y
6 楼
there are a lot of xml books, y not read one?
one of them is pretty good, <> by Charles Goldfarb
【在 vi 的大作中提到】
: Then why say 'Tomorrow Star of WWW (as the board name)'?
: Why make up something sounds totally different rather then enhance HTML?
: What is the relationship between XML and web services?
: In other words, is XML essential for utilizing web services?
: Thanks.
one of them is pretty good, <
【在 vi 的大作中提到】
: Then why say 'Tomorrow Star of WWW (as the board name)'?
: Why make up something sounds totally different rather then enhance HTML?
: What is the relationship between XML and web services?
: In other words, is XML essential for utilizing web services?
: Thanks.
s*g
7 楼
I beleive they are both originated from SGML which was developed for military
purpose. The original SGML is extremely complicated.
【在 f********y 的大作中提到】
: there are a lot of xml books, y not read one?
: one of them is pretty good, <> by Charles Goldfarb
purpose. The original SGML is extremely complicated.
【在 f********y 的大作中提到】
: there are a lot of xml books, y not read one?
: one of them is pretty good, <
相关阅读
问一个JBUILDER3.5的蠢问题Re: [转载] who know how to crack the XML Spy 3.5?schema 开发工具有那些？？ICQ on SGI UNIX?Anyone has experience about security in soap?关于parser 的几个问题[转载] May a XML file have more than one root? 如何将文本显示在一行?XML protocolProblem with transformNode??[转载] what is ASN.1XML 最新SpecificationXML editor?how to represent a graph in xml?想让本地运行的IE打开一个本地文件夹，XML好事么？newbie question.. what's process instruction?XML Authority怎样把本板精华区的内容一次打包传回自己的信箱？java question about xml有没有人对php & apache感兴趣的？