Redian新闻
>
ConsumerReport:没发现任何显著iPad2速度提升
avatar
ConsumerReport:没发现任何显著iPad2速度提升# Apple - 家有苹果
w*u
1
Starwood Preferred Guest信用卡 开卡25000 bonus points 最高可入住12晚酒店
http://goo.gl/vJ71M
Earn 10,000 Starpoints with your first purchase and an additional 15,000
Starpoints when you spend $5,000 in 6 months 可以直接兑换250刀amazon gift
card
http://goo.gl/vJ71M
填完后会在60秒告诉你结果,这个卡是第一年免年费的,之后是$65, 可以在第二年关
闭避免被收取年费。即使第二年开始有年费,个人觉得还是一张值得长期使用的信用卡
。 消费一笔后两周内会把10000 point在你卡上,不会使用的人可以兑换$100
giftcard. 选择其他的 giftcard(Starbucks, Gap,Nordstrom)请选择Redeem in other
partners。请注意这一万点就可以换到最高5晚的category 1的酒店入住了。
下面的是非常关键的内容:
请大家尽快不要把点数兑换以上的250刀 amazon gift card,因为可以直接使用获得的
点数入住SPG酒店,Category 1: 以aloft为例,可以直接用2000points/晚 入住周末
房,或者以1200 points+25刀 在任意天入住。 Category 2: 以Four Points by
Sheraton为例,可以使用3000points/晚 入住周末房, 或者以1600 points +30刀在任
意天入住。
即使是消费第一笔后获得的10000points,也可以获得最高五晚的酒店入住。而且这类
酒店在中国区也是有效的。如果消费满5000刀,更可以获得另外的最高七晚的酒店入住。
avatar
s*6
2
我经历的整个过程分享给大家,祝顺利~
流程涉及三个单位:中方(大使馆和纽约留学中心)、美国国务院、和美国移民局。每
个单位办理申请历时两个月,总共J1 waiver一般耗时6个月。
2017/08/10 https://j1visawaiverrecommendation.state.gov/ 通过美国国务院(
DOS)J1豁免网站,填写资料,取得豁免序列号(Case Number)
2017/08/11 http://new.chinesehighway.com/content/j1.do 纽约中国留学中心的网站注册、填写信息,在线提交申请
2017/08/12 分别向纽约留学中心和国务院邮寄资料;三天后网站显示资料收到
大约同时美国务院表示收到材料,等从中方收 non objection letter (不持
异议信)
2017/08/16 纽约留学服务中心开始办理
2017/10/11 初审通过,纽约服务中心报送所属使领馆
所属使领馆审核通过,申请将于近日报送中国驻美国大使馆教育处进行审批
2017/12/04 中国驻美国大使馆教育处审批通过,向美国国务院所属的WAIVER
REVIEW DIVISION 正式发出“不持异议信”。申办豁免事宜的中方手续全部办理完毕

2017/12/13 美国国务院网站显示收到不持异议信No Objection Statement
Received(https://j1visawaiverrecommendation.state.gov/
2017/12/28 美国国务院给移民局发出Favorable recommendation letter
2018/01 移民局收到,并寄给我一封纸质I797C表
2018/04/04 移民局I797 通过,并寄给我一封纸质I797(收好)。豁免手续全部办
理完毕
其他细节:
(1)纽约中国留学服务中心负责全美“J-1签证豁免”申请的咨询与材料初审工作。按
照其网站和美国国务院J1 waiver网站的每个步骤如实填写。先填美国国务院J1豁免的
网站,拿到Case number,然后在纽约留学中心填写时要填写Case number.
(2)听从了其他人分享的经验,同时一趟给去邮局纽约留学服务中心和美国国务院寄
的材料,避免出现美方无法将收到的NOL与你的个人资料相对应而耽搁时间。
(3)纽约留学中心的网站,提交申请之后,有什么动向都会发一份邮件,keep you
informed 比较人性化。我由于被通知重新修改提交申请两次,这个步骤上花了4个月,
总共就是8个月办完了J1豁免。
(4)其中第一次是重新修改写申请原因申请书,包括个人学历简历,内容其实不变,
我只是把格式改成更容易读,基本就是时间顺序一一列举:•x年X月-x月,在xx
国xx大学,攻读xx学位。就可以了。
(5)第二次是需要我补充雇主的确认信。我的豁免申请原因就是J1换H, 纽约留学中心
反馈通知我要求一封雇主的确认信,学校HR写完老板签名了又寄给了纽约留学中心。都
不难弄,只是一来一回花更多一些时间。
(6)学校网站一般都会有J1 waiver的相关信息和提醒,帮助做好准备功课,挺好用的。
(7)原有的J1工作合同在J1 waiver之后不能续原来J1的DS2019了,要开始新的DS2019
。J1 waiver中国给每个人只办一次,waive之后就不要继续产生新的J1,以免新的J1带
有新的212e两年回国要求。
avatar
a*y
3
One major difference in tech specs is that the iPad 2 has a new processor
that’s supposed to make it far speedier than the original, While performing
routine tasks such as Web browsing and e-mail in our tests, we didn’t
notice any significant speed improvement.
这个测评网站是否可以改名Trolling Report
http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2011/03/ipad-2-vid
avatar
m*e
4

performing
Why? They are just stating the truth.
The title is a bit trolling though, but I doubt that came from
consumerreports.
So point your finger at the right person.

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: One major difference in tech specs is that the iPad 2 has a new processor
: that’s supposed to make it far speedier than the original, While performing
: routine tasks such as Web browsing and e-mail in our tests, we didn’t
: notice any significant speed improvement.
: 这个测评网站是否可以改名Trolling Report
: http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2011/03/ipad-2-vid

avatar
h*x
5
阿嚏自己标题党,给CR"加上"了个标题,令人不齿的行为啊

【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
:
: performing
: Why? They are just stating the truth.
: The title is a bit trolling though, but I doubt that came from
: consumerreports.
: So point your finger at the right person.

avatar
a*y
6
这不是标题啊
标题是引用CR说的话

【在 h****x 的大作中提到】
: 阿嚏自己标题党,给CR"加上"了个标题,令人不齿的行为啊
avatar
a*y
7
consumer report:
we didn't notice any significant speed improvement.
Please read.

【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
:
: performing
: Why? They are just stating the truth.
: The title is a bit trolling though, but I doubt that came from
: consumerreports.
: So point your finger at the right person.

avatar
m*e
8

And you missed the "While performing routine tasks such as Web browsing and
e-mail in our tests" part. Do you know what a complete sentence is?
Plus, you didn't provide a link. And CR requires subscription too. By your
standards, this is borderline bannable.
So I guess the finter points back to yourself.

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: consumer report:
: we didn't notice any significant speed improvement.
: Please read.

avatar
a*y
9
if this is what you do when you come to board, for the past few weeks, as
far as I can tell, I suggest you to not to waste time of both of us.

and

【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
:
: And you missed the "While performing routine tasks such as Web browsing and
: e-mail in our tests" part. Do you know what a complete sentence is?
: Plus, you didn't provide a link. And CR requires subscription too. By your
: standards, this is borderline bannable.
: So I guess the finter points back to yourself.

avatar
m*e
10

I don't care about what you suggest.

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: if this is what you do when you come to board, for the past few weeks, as
: far as I can tell, I suggest you to not to waste time of both of us.
:
: and

avatar
h*x
11
CR的blog是没有标题的,它的本意是说email和web没有发现显著的提高,阿嚏给加了
个标题,然后截取"无显著提高"部分,这不是断章取义的教科书样板么,呵呵,想忽悠
大家?

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: 这不是标题啊
: 标题是引用CR说的话

avatar
m*e
12

All he wanted to do was discredit CR who does not kiss Apple's ass. If it
were another person in another direction that person would have been banned.

【在 h****x 的大作中提到】
: CR的blog是没有标题的,它的本意是说email和web没有发现显著的提高,阿嚏给加了
: 个标题,然后截取"无显著提高"部分,这不是断章取义的教科书样板么,呵呵,想忽悠
: 大家?

avatar
s*n
13
the bottleneck may be the network ...

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: One major difference in tech specs is that the iPad 2 has a new processor
: that’s supposed to make it far speedier than the original, While performing
: routine tasks such as Web browsing and e-mail in our tests, we didn’t
: notice any significant speed improvement.
: 这个测评网站是否可以改名Trolling Report
: http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2011/03/ipad-2-vid

avatar
h*x
14
他和pda班主真是一对绝配,两个人绝对意见相左,但是行为却惊人的相似,一时瑜亮
啊。

banned.

【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
:
: All he wanted to do was discredit CR who does not kiss Apple's ass. If it
: were another person in another direction that person would have been banned.

avatar
x*l
15
Here is a detailed comparison test Anandtech performed:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dua
According to the test on web browsing: ipad2>>ipad1(with ios 4.3)>=xoom.
I am surpised CR didn't notice any significant speed improvement. I felt it
was pretty obvious. Safari load pages much faster, at least 50% on my count.
I brought my ipad to apple store and compared with ipad2.

performing

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: One major difference in tech specs is that the iPad 2 has a new processor
: that’s supposed to make it far speedier than the original, While performing
: routine tasks such as Web browsing and e-mail in our tests, we didn’t
: notice any significant speed improvement.
: 这个测评网站是否可以改名Trolling Report
: http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2011/03/ipad-2-vid

avatar
i*o
16
围观版主和站务斗嘴:)
avatar
f*5
17
其实人cr老头挺厚道的,最后说了ipad是非常好的选择,其他便宜的性能不好,性能类
似的价格高。

【在 i*****o 的大作中提到】
: 围观版主和站务斗嘴:)
avatar
i*o
18
这个谁都知道,看看那个7‘’ 的galaxy tab竟然要价500刀,就知道ipad的性价比有
多高了。

【在 f*******5 的大作中提到】
: 其实人cr老头挺厚道的,最后说了ipad是非常好的选择,其他便宜的性能不好,性能类
: 似的价格高。

avatar
s*n
19
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEKD9CZJR5E&feature=popt1cus0a
Ipad 2 is faster, but the difference is not that huge.

it
count.

【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
: Here is a detailed comparison test Anandtech performed:
: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dua
: According to the test on web browsing: ipad2>>ipad1(with ios 4.3)>=xoom.
: I am surpised CR didn't notice any significant speed improvement. I felt it
: was pretty obvious. Safari load pages much faster, at least 50% on my count.
: I brought my ipad to apple store and compared with ipad2.
:
: performing

avatar
t*2
22
都说过了,A5就是多了点三角.
avatar
c*e
23
评测可以考虑anandtech,人家还是比较专业的,maximumpc也可以,不过人家
不一定会cover ipad,我记得有iphone的

performing

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: One major difference in tech specs is that the iPad 2 has a new processor
: that’s supposed to make it far speedier than the original, While performing
: routine tasks such as Web browsing and e-mail in our tests, we didn’t
: notice any significant speed improvement.
: 这个测评网站是否可以改名Trolling Report
: http://blogs.consumerreports.org/electronics/2011/03/ipad-2-vid

avatar
T*0
24
CR 不是在所有领域都很专业的. 不必全信.
avatar
a*e
25
逻辑问题
ipad的性价比比galaxy高和ipad性价比高是两码事

【在 i*****o 的大作中提到】
: 这个谁都知道,看看那个7‘’ 的galaxy tab竟然要价500刀,就知道ipad的性价比有
: 多高了。

avatar
a*y
26
no they won't.
stop your BS.

banned.

【在 m*****e 的大作中提到】
:
: All he wanted to do was discredit CR who does not kiss Apple's ass. If it
: were another person in another direction that person would have been banned.

avatar
m*e
27

Like you never done that BS before.

【在 a***y 的大作中提到】
: no they won't.
: stop your BS.
:
: banned.

avatar
a*y
28
Their definition of significant probably is showing up webpages instantly
without delay.
Also, Mail has a lot of animations. With these animations it is not easy to
notice the speed increase. Because it takes the same amount of time to do
the animation. But their assertion, in contrast to all the other reviews out
there, is silly, and likely trolling because of their history with iPhone 4
ATT and Verizon.
In the mean time, Arstechnica reviewed iPad 2 confirming significant speed
increase.

it
count.

【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
: Here is a detailed comparison test Anandtech performed:
: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dua
: According to the test on web browsing: ipad2>>ipad1(with ios 4.3)>=xoom.
: I am surpised CR didn't notice any significant speed improvement. I felt it
: was pretty obvious. Safari load pages much faster, at least 50% on my count.
: I brought my ipad to apple store and compared with ipad2.
:
: performing

avatar
a*y
29
They are also basically the only one saying iPhone 4 Verizon has antenna
gate.

【在 f*******5 的大作中提到】
: 其实人cr老头挺厚道的,最后说了ipad是非常好的选择,其他便宜的性能不好,性能类
: 似的价格高。

avatar
s*u
30
1,2秒的差别本来就不significant, 这些评测看看就好。

cortex-a9-powervr-sgx-543mp2/2
it
count.

【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
: Here is a detailed comparison test Anandtech performed:
: http://www.anandtech.com/show/4215/apple-ipad-2-benchmarked-dua
: According to the test on web browsing: ipad2>>ipad1(with ios 4.3)>=xoom.
: I am surpised CR didn't notice any significant speed improvement. I felt it
: was pretty obvious. Safari load pages much faster, at least 50% on my count.
: I brought my ipad to apple store and compared with ipad2.
:
: performing

avatar
s*u
31
CR大概是唯一一个不用厂家提供的sample做test的,
对天线的test,大概也是唯一一个上了radio frequency isolation chamber的。

【在 c*******e 的大作中提到】
: 评测可以考虑anandtech,人家还是比较专业的,maximumpc也可以,不过人家
: 不一定会cover ipad,我记得有iphone的
:
: performing

avatar
a*y
32
据我所知,他们的天线信号测试设备其实比起真的做手机的厂家,比如苹果的实验室,
差远了。
所以苹果的工程师对CR的天线测评嗤之以鼻。
事实证明其实问题主要还是ATT覆盖太差。iPhone 4的天线有点两极化。

【在 s**u 的大作中提到】
: CR大概是唯一一个不用厂家提供的sample做test的,
: 对天线的test,大概也是唯一一个上了radio frequency isolation chamber的。

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。