Z*i
2 楼
问个很 silly 的 问题
弱Eb1b Case , 主要是 citation 少, 公司请的律师 claim 了老三样,
contribution里也没提citation, 只是大段copy了推荐信里吹捧的话, 然后还
说了一个专利, 就没了。我有很强的预感会吃 REF。
我原来的打算是把review放到contribution里, claim contribution and authorship.
但是和公司请的律师沟通实在是太困难了, 除了当初要我提供材料的时候有email往返
,
以后我发的email基本上是石沉大海, 没回应。 想通过公司的HR,他们还嫌我罗嗦,
说律师是专业人士。。。。
唉, 不罗嗦了,
PL claim 了三项, REF 以后能改 claim 两项吗?
谢谢!
弱Eb1b Case , 主要是 citation 少, 公司请的律师 claim 了老三样,
contribution里也没提citation, 只是大段copy了推荐信里吹捧的话, 然后还
说了一个专利, 就没了。我有很强的预感会吃 REF。
我原来的打算是把review放到contribution里, claim contribution and authorship.
但是和公司请的律师沟通实在是太困难了, 除了当初要我提供材料的时候有email往返
,
以后我发的email基本上是石沉大海, 没回应。 想通过公司的HR,他们还嫌我罗嗦,
说律师是专业人士。。。。
唉, 不罗嗦了,
PL claim 了三项, REF 以后能改 claim 两项吗?
谢谢!
y*m
3 楼
h1,有国内驾照.好像要I797全表?(签证时仅上半截即ok)
有国内驾照好像不用learner permit么? VA
thx!
有国内驾照好像不用learner permit么? VA
thx!
O*k
4 楼
机票是1点1c
T*y
5 楼
Is your review very strong or not? If it's very strong, you can take it out,
otherwise you may put it in the last section to talk about, and it does not
matter whether you claim 2 or 3 items, but how you can strengthen your
contribution, that is the most important thing that needs evidential support
in the RFE response.
authorship.
,
【在 Z*****i 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 问个很 silly 的 问题
: 弱Eb1b Case , 主要是 citation 少, 公司请的律师 claim 了老三样,
: contribution里也没提citation, 只是大段copy了推荐信里吹捧的话, 然后还
: 说了一个专利, 就没了。我有很强的预感会吃 REF。
: 我原来的打算是把review放到contribution里, claim contribution and authorship.
: 但是和公司请的律师沟通实在是太困难了, 除了当初要我提供材料的时候有email往返
: ,
: 以后我发的email基本上是石沉大海, 没回应。 想通过公司的HR,他们还嫌我罗嗦,
: 说律师是专业人士。。。。
: 唉, 不罗嗦了,
otherwise you may put it in the last section to talk about, and it does not
matter whether you claim 2 or 3 items, but how you can strengthen your
contribution, that is the most important thing that needs evidential support
in the RFE response.
authorship.
,
【在 Z*****i 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 问个很 silly 的 问题
: 弱Eb1b Case , 主要是 citation 少, 公司请的律师 claim 了老三样,
: contribution里也没提citation, 只是大段copy了推荐信里吹捧的话, 然后还
: 说了一个专利, 就没了。我有很强的预感会吃 REF。
: 我原来的打算是把review放到contribution里, claim contribution and authorship.
: 但是和公司请的律师沟通实在是太困难了, 除了当初要我提供材料的时候有email往返
: ,
: 以后我发的email基本上是石沉大海, 没回应。 想通过公司的HR,他们还嫌我罗嗦,
: 说律师是专业人士。。。。
: 唉, 不罗嗦了,
s*d
6 楼
看dmv website.
z*i
7 楼
办Citi ThankYou® Premier , 把所有点数整合换机票?
J*n
8 楼
当然可以,只要你觉得你claim的两项够强。
f*n
10 楼
ls正解
非big spender那时机要算好 刚好凑齐
非big spender那时机要算好 刚好凑齐
a*e
11 楼
agree
我也认为claim2或者3,都不会make big difference
也许到时候你会很suprise的发现都过了
但是关于contribution,还有totality要好好准备下
公司律师好像都是这样,我们公司的律师也是
大段抄写推荐信的内容,他们觉得写PL大概就是这样.
out,
not
support
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Is your review very strong or not? If it's very strong, you can take it out,
: otherwise you may put it in the last section to talk about, and it does not
: matter whether you claim 2 or 3 items, but how you can strengthen your
: contribution, that is the most important thing that needs evidential support
: in the RFE response.
:
: authorship.
: ,
我也认为claim2或者3,都不会make big difference
也许到时候你会很suprise的发现都过了
但是关于contribution,还有totality要好好准备下
公司律师好像都是这样,我们公司的律师也是
大段抄写推荐信的内容,他们觉得写PL大概就是这样.
out,
not
support
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Is your review very strong or not? If it's very strong, you can take it out,
: otherwise you may put it in the last section to talk about, and it does not
: matter whether you claim 2 or 3 items, but how you can strengthen your
: contribution, that is the most important thing that needs evidential support
: in the RFE response.
:
: authorship.
: ,
c*g
14 楼
你就别瞎操心了。你的case直接就批了
Z*i
16 楼
reivew的条件一般, 期刊加会议 30+, 水平良莠不齐,
有一封不错的journal 的 editor的推荐信
你的意思是不管我现在claim 2 or 3, 最终IO 会用totality 来衡量?
谢谢!
out,
not
support
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Is your review very strong or not? If it's very strong, you can take it out,
: otherwise you may put it in the last section to talk about, and it does not
: matter whether you claim 2 or 3 items, but how you can strengthen your
: contribution, that is the most important thing that needs evidential support
: in the RFE response.
:
: authorship.
: ,
有一封不错的journal 的 editor的推荐信
你的意思是不管我现在claim 2 or 3, 最终IO 会用totality 来衡量?
谢谢!
out,
not
support
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Is your review very strong or not? If it's very strong, you can take it out,
: otherwise you may put it in the last section to talk about, and it does not
: matter whether you claim 2 or 3 items, but how you can strengthen your
: contribution, that is the most important thing that needs evidential support
: in the RFE response.
:
: authorship.
: ,
T*y
19 楼
The review part is about right. You may claim it in a section. You could even get one or two more such review verification letters, if it's not too much hassle for you.
You can use them to emphasize different things, such as one that mentions the first paper you reviewed to show that you were treated as a famous scholar since early on; or the journals you've reviewed are circulated around the world; or their impact factors or rankings are at the top, etc.
Exactly! Totality is the key, everything else supports it.
As to the lawyer's approach to cite reference letters, that's the way to go. The key is not that they should cite the letters a lot or not, but what should be put into those reference letters in the first place!
Every evidence can be spoken from the references' mouths, and that makes it as a double affirmation from both the hard evidence and the soft evidence.
If you want to claim anything, make the references claim those as well.
【在 Z*****i 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: reivew的条件一般, 期刊加会议 30+, 水平良莠不齐,
: 有一封不错的journal 的 editor的推荐信
: 你的意思是不管我现在claim 2 or 3, 最终IO 会用totality 来衡量?
: 谢谢!
:
: out,
: not
: support
Z*i
23 楼
haha, don't worry, I will have baozi soon
相关阅读
CEL灯亮了半个月 (转载)Honda Odyssey EX-L for $31,558, MSRP $36,455, CA换完刹车之后 有摩擦噪音2014 taurus sel 8500 off msrp 值得入吗问题请教(急问) 外州驾照(MA)可以在加州买车买保险吗[合集] 鼓励大家把父母搬过来-免费大红漂亮西红柿 (转载)车祸估算损失,找什么样的dealer好,谢撞鹿续,自己动手丰衣足食日黑勿拍,就事论事。凯美瑞算省油神车嘛?换前轮刹车要350块,这个价格靠谱不?人生完整了,撞车求问菜鸟问题,包子答谢克里夫兰——顶好超市,早上10点多撞我车的中国人 (转载)请有NISSAN ROGUE发表一下意见IS350和335i头对头奇怪了啊,美国不是有些州是“No-fault insurance”的吗?不得不说,汉奸多是聪明人。抗日的脑残居多电池cable腐蚀怎么换电池谈谈每家车厂的核心或者至少领先的技术usnews上mdx的安全性怎么才9.7?