i*e
2 楼
重点在这里“ In 2007, a report commissioned by an auto industry trade group
insisted that when you factor in the waste generated during production, the
notoriously gas-guzzling Hummer is actually greener than the Prius”
*****************************
Does hybrid car production waste offset hybrid benefits?
The hybrid car has been touted as the green savior of the automobile
industry. A decade after the Toyota Prius debuted worldwide, issues like
climate change and energy security have helped push the popular hybrid's
sales numbers past the two million mark -- nearly half of them sold in North
America [source: Autoblog].
Americans don't buy the Prius for its style or speed. They buy it to save
money on gas and to shrink their carbon footprint. In most American cities,
the personal automobile is the largest overall polluter, spewing millions of
pounds of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, carbon
monoxide and sulfur oxide into the atmosphere and into our lungs [source:
EPA]. Eco-conscious consumers see the Prius and other hybrids as an
investment in the environment and in our collective future.
But are hybrids really as green as they seem? How much is marketing hype and
how much is scientific fact? Because hybrids have a second electric motor,
they burn less fuel than conventional cars and emit lower levels of
greenhouse gases during operation. That's great, but what about the hybrid
manufacturing process? In 2007, a report commissioned by an auto industry
trade group insisted that when you factor in the waste generated during
production, the notoriously gas-guzzling Hummer is actually greener than the
Prius [source: Slashdot]. While this report was largely discredited by
environmental groups, it did raise an important question: does the pollution
created during hybrid production offset the benefits of "green" driving?
The answer might surprise you. According to an in-depth study by the U.S.
Department of Energy's Argonne National Laboratory, hybrid cars do, in fact,
require more energy to produce than conventional cars, emitting more
greenhouse gases and burning more fossil fuels during the manufacturing
process. The production of hybrid batteries, in particular, requires much
more energy than producing a standard car battery and results in higher
emission levels of gases like sulfur oxide [source: Burnham et al].
But do the environmental impacts of hybrid vehicle production outweigh the
long-term benefits of driving a cleaner running automobile? That answer is a
resounding "no." If you drive both a conventional and hybrid car for 160,
000 miles (257,495 kilometers), the conventional vehicle requires far more
energy to operate and emits far more greenhouse gases over its lifetime,
significantly canceling out any imbalance during the production stage [
source: Burnham et al].
Keep reading as we break down the statistics for both hybrid production
emissions and hybrid driving emissions and learn what "green" really means.
insisted that when you factor in the waste generated during production, the
notoriously gas-guzzling Hummer is actually greener than the Prius”
*****************************
Does hybrid car production waste offset hybrid benefits?
The hybrid car has been touted as the green savior of the automobile
industry. A decade after the Toyota Prius debuted worldwide, issues like
climate change and energy security have helped push the popular hybrid's
sales numbers past the two million mark -- nearly half of them sold in North
America [source: Autoblog].
Americans don't buy the Prius for its style or speed. They buy it to save
money on gas and to shrink their carbon footprint. In most American cities,
the personal automobile is the largest overall polluter, spewing millions of
pounds of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, carbon
monoxide and sulfur oxide into the atmosphere and into our lungs [source:
EPA]. Eco-conscious consumers see the Prius and other hybrids as an
investment in the environment and in our collective future.
But are hybrids really as green as they seem? How much is marketing hype and
how much is scientific fact? Because hybrids have a second electric motor,
they burn less fuel than conventional cars and emit lower levels of
greenhouse gases during operation. That's great, but what about the hybrid
manufacturing process? In 2007, a report commissioned by an auto industry
trade group insisted that when you factor in the waste generated during
production, the notoriously gas-guzzling Hummer is actually greener than the
Prius [source: Slashdot]. While this report was largely discredited by
environmental groups, it did raise an important question: does the pollution
created during hybrid production offset the benefits of "green" driving?
The answer might surprise you. According to an in-depth study by the U.S.
Department of Energy's Argonne National Laboratory, hybrid cars do, in fact,
require more energy to produce than conventional cars, emitting more
greenhouse gases and burning more fossil fuels during the manufacturing
process. The production of hybrid batteries, in particular, requires much
more energy than producing a standard car battery and results in higher
emission levels of gases like sulfur oxide [source: Burnham et al].
But do the environmental impacts of hybrid vehicle production outweigh the
long-term benefits of driving a cleaner running automobile? That answer is a
resounding "no." If you drive both a conventional and hybrid car for 160,
000 miles (257,495 kilometers), the conventional vehicle requires far more
energy to operate and emits far more greenhouse gases over its lifetime,
significantly canceling out any imbalance during the production stage [
source: Burnham et al].
Keep reading as we break down the statistics for both hybrid production
emissions and hybrid driving emissions and learn what "green" really means.
t*e
3 楼
you sure?
我看到最大一笔才2000
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/fb/after-hours
我看到最大一笔才2000
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/fb/after-hours
i*e
4 楼
开着电瓶车又想找道德制高点的，应该好好读一下。
s*o
5 楼
nothing. 所有的股票都会有这个现象。可能是庄稼到手。
T*s
6 楼
狐狸拍又来自取其辱
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 开着电瓶车又想找道德制高点的，应该好好读一下。
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 开着电瓶车又想找道德制高点的，应该好好读一下。
h*r
7 楼
这个不一定是盘后交易。可能是盘中的transaction但来不及上账。
【在 c********n 的大作中提到】
: 价格没有什么变化。
【在 c********n 的大作中提到】
: 价格没有什么变化。
a*2
8 楼
狐狸拍俩大爱好：自动裆黑木耳，菜油积碳黑菊。
i*x
9 楼
咦？红脖大叔被盗号了？你不是以污染为荣、为乐么？
发信人: ismellpuke (两田鼠奔丧), 信区: Automobile
标 题: Re: 管你们加州不加州的
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Sep 22 01:56:50 2015, 美东)
smoke a prius! ha ha!
咱德州反正年检不查emission，17刀查个safety了事。
老夫golf连整套emission system都卸掉了，屁事没有。
发信人: ismellpuke (两田鼠奔丧), 信区: Automobile
标 题: Re: 管你们加州不加州的
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Sep 22 01:56:50 2015, 美东)
smoke a prius! ha ha!
咱德州反正年检不查emission，17刀查个safety了事。
老夫golf连整套emission system都卸掉了，屁事没有。
i*e
10 楼
哪个更污染不是很明显吗?
【在 i****x 的大作中提到】
: 咦？红脖大叔被盗号了？你不是以污染为荣、为乐么？
: 发信人: ismellpuke (两田鼠奔丧), 信区: Automobile
: 标 题: Re: 管你们加州不加州的
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Sep 22 01:56:50 2015, 美东)
: smoke a prius! ha ha!
:
: 咱德州反正年检不查emission，17刀查个safety了事。
: 老夫golf连整套emission system都卸掉了，屁事没有。
【在 i****x 的大作中提到】
: 咦？红脖大叔被盗号了？你不是以污染为荣、为乐么？
: 发信人: ismellpuke (两田鼠奔丧), 信区: Automobile
: 标 题: Re: 管你们加州不加州的
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Sep 22 01:56:50 2015, 美东)
: smoke a prius! ha ha!
:
: 咱德州反正年检不查emission，17刀查个safety了事。
: 老夫golf连整套emission system都卸掉了，屁事没有。
i*e
11 楼
你几乎所有发贴都是空洞无物的攻击贴，在日托食物链里你是最底层的蛆。
【在 a****2 的大作中提到】
: 狐狸拍俩大爱好：自动裆黑木耳，菜油积碳黑菊。
【在 a****2 的大作中提到】
: 狐狸拍俩大爱好：自动裆黑木耳，菜油积碳黑菊。
i*x
12 楼
不明显，倒是你支持拆除柴油排放控制机构的态度比较明显，是不是因为柴油黑烟能够
治理电池污染啊？我孤陋寡闻，请您讲解一下
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 哪个更污染不是很明显吗?
治理电池污染啊？我孤陋寡闻，请您讲解一下
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 哪个更污染不是很明显吗?
i*e
13 楼
你中午饭里加点重金属盐佐料吧，很怏就可以tenure了
【在 i****x 的大作中提到】
: 不明显，倒是你支持拆除柴油排放控制机构的态度比较明显，是不是因为柴油黑烟能够
: 治理电池污染啊？我孤陋寡闻，请您讲解一下
【在 i****x 的大作中提到】
: 不明显，倒是你支持拆除柴油排放控制机构的态度比较明显，是不是因为柴油黑烟能够
: 治理电池污染啊？我孤陋寡闻，请您讲解一下
i*x
14 楼
每天吸黑烟能治脑残，你试试
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 你中午饭里加点重金属盐佐料吧，很怏就可以tenure了
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 你中午饭里加点重金属盐佐料吧，很怏就可以tenure了
T*s
15 楼
他一个人能削你仨
你几乎所有发贴都是空洞无物的攻击贴，在日托食物链里你是最底层的蛆。
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 你几乎所有发贴都是空洞无物的攻击贴，在日托食物链里你是最底层的蛆。
你几乎所有发贴都是空洞无物的攻击贴，在日托食物链里你是最底层的蛆。
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 你几乎所有发贴都是空洞无物的攻击贴，在日托食物链里你是最底层的蛆。
a*2
16 楼
你接盘破产黑木耳SB车里的日本丰田爱信自动裆变速箱难道不是你的最爱?!?! 一脚踩
爆了你的睾丸,你才会跳这么高。
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 你几乎所有发贴都是空洞无物的攻击贴，在日托食物链里你是最底层的蛆。
爆了你的睾丸,你才会跳这么高。
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 你几乎所有发贴都是空洞无物的攻击贴，在日托食物链里你是最底层的蛆。
c*z
17 楼
But do the environmental impacts of hybrid vehicle production outweigh the
long-term benefits of driving a cleaner running automobile? That answer is a
resounding "no."
long-term benefits of driving a cleaner running automobile? That answer is a
resounding "no."
i*e
18 楼
你先住在生产回收电池的癌症村再发言吧
a
【在 c*****z 的大作中提到】
: But do the environmental impacts of hybrid vehicle production outweigh the
: long-term benefits of driving a cleaner running automobile? That answer is a
: resounding "no."
a
【在 c*****z 的大作中提到】
: But do the environmental impacts of hybrid vehicle production outweigh the
: long-term benefits of driving a cleaner running automobile? That answer is a
: resounding "no."
c*z
19 楼
这句是你发的，不是我发的。我不过把你发的帖子里的一句话拿了出来而已。
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 你先住在生产回收电池的癌症村再发言吧
:
: a
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 你先住在生产回收电池的癌症村再发言吧
:
: a
p*x
20 楼
啧啧，这智商，不愧是车版第一喷货。连自己发的link都不看，人家贴了你自己发的文
章里的一句话，你蹦什么蹦？天天自己打脸很好玩吧
a
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 你先住在生产回收电池的癌症村再发言吧
:
: a
章里的一句话，你蹦什么蹦？天天自己打脸很好玩吧
a
【在 i********e 的大作中提到】
: 你先住在生产回收电池的癌症村再发言吧
:
: a
D*0
21 楼
原文链接
http://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/everyday-myths
话说，LZ已经点明了“重点”是哪一句，你们干嘛还联系上下文呢？
http://science.howstuffworks.com/science-vs-myth/everyday-myths
话说，LZ已经点明了“重点”是哪一句，你们干嘛还联系上下文呢？
相关阅读
求助打火问题一家五口，X5, ML350, MDX, RX350 选择中2015 GL450 10% off2015 4runner才是真正的古董车出差租奔驰车的经验众泰，是大众的马甲吗，这 suv 这么脸熟rogue现在otd什么价格？昨天开车被人竖中指了爱车闲置注意几大关键部位(zz)奥斯丁车展十款车的主动刹车防碰撞测试请问最近湾区有什么q5的丢吗？在加州最划算的车应该是买电动车吧？最近想入手RX350 2015，不知道坛子里有没有刚入手的？MSRP是多少？要买轮胎求比较：costco和sams club方向盘左转向没有助力是什么原因？车盲请教SUV和hatchback的比较新设计的camry就是狗屎，小毛病不断！破凯美瑞女司机2015 outback premium OTD