h*k
2 楼
L*r
3 楼
Report this comment | #48104
Bill Capricorn said:
Why ridiculous news articles in a prestigous academic jounal raise
suspicions
'Regular brain monitoring of editors' could help to dispel doubts.
For news in an academic journal, how ridiculous is too ridiculous? That
question might have dogged the editor of the British academic journal "
Nature". The recent news report by this journal "Why great Olympic feats
raise suspicions" has raised ubiquitous concerns about whether its editor
has experienced severe brain damage.
Was the ridiculousness of that news article anomalous?
Yes. Since Nature's first publication in 1869, never have people seen
news articles this ridiculous approved by its editors. The decision of
publishing this article is absolutely out of readers' expectations.
Dosen't serving as the editor of an academic journal rule of the
possibility of brain damage?
No, says Sister Pheonix, a well-known expert in the field of bran damage
research.
How would ridiculousness of articles be used to test for brain damage of
editors?
Readers need a better way of flagging anomalous ridiculousness of news
articles, says Sister Lotus. The Global Times, a news paper that views China
as simply freaking awesome and the rest
of the world pretty much piece of crap, dabbled in regular brain
monitoring of its editors.
Could an editor then be hospitalized simply for publishing articles too
ridiculous?
"That would be unfair", says Sister Pheonix. "The final verdict is only
ever going to be reached by medical examination. It has to be." Publishing
ridiculous articles is too far removed from brain damage of the editor and
influenced by too many outside factors, Sister Pheonix says. "When we read
this wickedly ridiculous news article approved for publishing by it editor,
that's not proof of anything. It asks a question or two."
Bill Capricorn said:
Why ridiculous news articles in a prestigous academic jounal raise
suspicions
'Regular brain monitoring of editors' could help to dispel doubts.
For news in an academic journal, how ridiculous is too ridiculous? That
question might have dogged the editor of the British academic journal "
Nature". The recent news report by this journal "Why great Olympic feats
raise suspicions" has raised ubiquitous concerns about whether its editor
has experienced severe brain damage.
Was the ridiculousness of that news article anomalous?
Yes. Since Nature's first publication in 1869, never have people seen
news articles this ridiculous approved by its editors. The decision of
publishing this article is absolutely out of readers' expectations.
Dosen't serving as the editor of an academic journal rule of the
possibility of brain damage?
No, says Sister Pheonix, a well-known expert in the field of bran damage
research.
How would ridiculousness of articles be used to test for brain damage of
editors?
Readers need a better way of flagging anomalous ridiculousness of news
articles, says Sister Lotus. The Global Times, a news paper that views China
as simply freaking awesome and the rest
of the world pretty much piece of crap, dabbled in regular brain
monitoring of its editors.
Could an editor then be hospitalized simply for publishing articles too
ridiculous?
"That would be unfair", says Sister Pheonix. "The final verdict is only
ever going to be reached by medical examination. It has to be." Publishing
ridiculous articles is too far removed from brain damage of the editor and
influenced by too many outside factors, Sister Pheonix says. "When we read
this wickedly ridiculous news article approved for publishing by it editor,
that's not proof of anything. It asks a question or two."
p*n
4 楼
找二手版的倒爷,或者在国内找银行门口的倒爷
Q*n
5 楼
hehe
相关阅读
Eric Betzig一直极度仇视小威吧我手拿一把移液枪,走到哪里都不慌Betzig老婆是不是Na Ji也谈偷idea:庄小威STORM之前,很多工作已经铺好路了 (转载)Oncotarget这个杂志怎么样Job Post: Manufacturing Associate in Maryland吉娜什么时候能评上美国科学院院士? (转载)Job Opening每个实验室都有一个P事特别多的人Doug Melton分化出来人beta细胞了转载【赛先生独家新闻】华人科学家有同等工作却未获今天诺贝尔化学奖也发一个招人信息~bioinformatician求两篇文献有一点佩服小威Help about full article of a paper!有没有什么仪器可以做的?为啥就生物drama多?植物miRNA进入动物体内有别的组做出来么青蒿素今年也许有希望Betzig为什么在家里做原型机