it still back the original article that Ye's performace is 'anomalous', if so what about american teen's 16 seconds improvement in past 6 months. their apologize is for not detailing the proof for the 'anomalous' The story’s intention as an Explainer was to examine how science can help resolve debates over extraordinary performances, not to examine those performance statistics in detail. Several analyses done by others convinced us that it was fair to characterize Ye’s performance as ‘anomalous’ — in the sense that it was statistically unusual. But we acknowledge that the combination of errors discussed above and the absence of a more detailed discussion of the statistics (which with hindsight we regret) gave the impression that we were supporting accusations against her, even though this was emphatically not our intention. For that, we apologize to our readers and to Ye Shiwen.
basically the apology is like this: you are cheating, but we do not list the facts correctly and should have used the right statistics analysis here, for that ( for not prove it the right way we should), we apologize. ( we still stand by our point though)
f*r
28 楼
我在walmart找到了,叫Wet Ones Antibacterial hands and face wipes