visiting associate professor是一个什么样的职位啊？# Biology - 生物学
a*g
1 楼
烙印早就发现ICC在作假，瞄上了EB1C. EB1AB 太难做假，学历要求对烙印来说太高
。烙印有几个PHD的？大多是３年的学位。好，EB1C就太容易了。
历史上，９０年代的时候，老中也ABUSE过！那时，纽约的唐人街上随便抓一个就是跨
国公司经理，都是通过华人贸易公司办的。后来移民局发现被耍了，严打，从此消失好
长时间。现在又来了，ICC成了主力。
法律有没有规定ICC里美国人的比率不得低于５０％？这种漏洞太大了。实际上就是，
美国公司可以通过ICC随便雇佣低价劳力，而且供应是无限量的。 这里相信很多人是
吃IT饭的，不堵上，你我的将来堪忧啊。ICC现在在IT界搞，以后任何行业均渗透，只
要有利润。ICC找来的好多并无突出技能，毫无经验只有３年大专学历的小孩，冒充５
年以上经验的到处都是。利益网里全是腐败。看INFOSYS的一雇员告了ICC，揭露太多内
幕。其实大型美国公司也通过L1在９０年代末从印度，中国大陆和新加坡直接把无美国
学位的，３－４年工作经验的冠以L1签证搬过来。这批人现在大多成了公民了，很多人
有了这种头衔（其实手下一个兵也没有）读了MBA，有了绿卡后直接去华尔街了或海归
抢位了。９１１后来的全赶上这“失去的十年了”，人生就是这样，没啥公平不公平，
顺服上帝的安排吧。
http://immigrationroad.com/blog/potential-visa-retrogression-st
A prediction from Charles Oppenheim about EB-2 retrogression has sent a
shock wave among I-485 applicants, likely prompting a protest against the
much easier venue classified as EB1-C for international managers.
Mr. Oppenheim, Chief of the Visa Control and Reporting Division at the
Department of State, announced at the AILA Midwest Regional Conference on
March 16 that EB-2 priority dates for India and China could potentially
retrogress all the way back to August 2007! Any this may happen during
either the May or June 2012 Visa Bulletin.
His prediction, always considered trustworthy given his position, caused
widespread frustration among EB-2 filers. It seemed particularly
disappointing because the category’s cutoff dates have been advancing
rapidly for months. However, many people were kind of expecting the bad news
, since Mr. Oppenheim did warn about potential retrogression at some point
this year. So it was his other prediction that appeared to be hurting: No
EB1 spillover to EB2 this year.
A visa “spill-over” means that unused visa numbers for a given EB
preference are re-allocated to the next category. In recent years, spillover
from EB-1 has helped the EB-2 category tremendously. But Mr. Oppenheim
believes that all EB-1 visa numbers will be consumed within the category
this year. On top of that, due to the government’s heavy promotion of
investor visas, the EB-5 category will likely exhaust their allotment as
well.
So all of these have painted a bleak future for EB-2 for the remainder of FY
-2012. Coincidentally, there is now a petition proposing a thorough
investigation into EB-1C, reserved for multinational managers or executives.
A group has set up a petition to Congress: Stop EB1 C ABUSE and FRAUDULENT
filing. Here is what the petition says:
We would like to appraise you of a particular area of United States
Immigration law that has a huge potential of fraud and misrepresentation
along with being unfairly biased in favor of the people who choose to abuse
it. We are talking about the Employment-based first preference category EB1C
(International Managers). As you are already probably aware, the
requirements for eligibility in that category is just a year of overseas
managerial experience in a company that conducts business in both US and
abroad. We are sure you will agree that compared to the fair and stringent
requirements of EB1A (persons of exceptional ability) and EB1B (outstanding
researchers), this is a rather simple qualification to prove. Moreover it
opens up avenues for fraud and misrepresentation particularly by overseas
companies doing business in USA to unfairly take advantage of this simple
requirement.
In some cases, a journey from L1 visa to EB1C green card does appear to be
much shorter, compared to those who studied in the U.S. for a degree and
then had to wait many years for their EB2 or EB3 green cards. On the other
hand, there are indeed people who worked really hard overseas, climbed up
the ranks, and eventually got transferred to the States as managers. So I
hope the petition, if fruitful, will help block the loopholes where (
staffing) companies simply assign manager titles to people for the purpose
of gaining an advantage in immigration, rather than closing the door for
legitimate candidates.
。烙印有几个PHD的？大多是３年的学位。好，EB1C就太容易了。
历史上，９０年代的时候，老中也ABUSE过！那时，纽约的唐人街上随便抓一个就是跨
国公司经理，都是通过华人贸易公司办的。后来移民局发现被耍了，严打，从此消失好
长时间。现在又来了，ICC成了主力。
法律有没有规定ICC里美国人的比率不得低于５０％？这种漏洞太大了。实际上就是，
美国公司可以通过ICC随便雇佣低价劳力，而且供应是无限量的。 这里相信很多人是
吃IT饭的，不堵上，你我的将来堪忧啊。ICC现在在IT界搞，以后任何行业均渗透，只
要有利润。ICC找来的好多并无突出技能，毫无经验只有３年大专学历的小孩，冒充５
年以上经验的到处都是。利益网里全是腐败。看INFOSYS的一雇员告了ICC，揭露太多内
幕。其实大型美国公司也通过L1在９０年代末从印度，中国大陆和新加坡直接把无美国
学位的，３－４年工作经验的冠以L1签证搬过来。这批人现在大多成了公民了，很多人
有了这种头衔（其实手下一个兵也没有）读了MBA，有了绿卡后直接去华尔街了或海归
抢位了。９１１后来的全赶上这“失去的十年了”，人生就是这样，没啥公平不公平，
顺服上帝的安排吧。
http://immigrationroad.com/blog/potential-visa-retrogression-st
A prediction from Charles Oppenheim about EB-2 retrogression has sent a
shock wave among I-485 applicants, likely prompting a protest against the
much easier venue classified as EB1-C for international managers.
Mr. Oppenheim, Chief of the Visa Control and Reporting Division at the
Department of State, announced at the AILA Midwest Regional Conference on
March 16 that EB-2 priority dates for India and China could potentially
retrogress all the way back to August 2007! Any this may happen during
either the May or June 2012 Visa Bulletin.
His prediction, always considered trustworthy given his position, caused
widespread frustration among EB-2 filers. It seemed particularly
disappointing because the category’s cutoff dates have been advancing
rapidly for months. However, many people were kind of expecting the bad news
, since Mr. Oppenheim did warn about potential retrogression at some point
this year. So it was his other prediction that appeared to be hurting: No
EB1 spillover to EB2 this year.
A visa “spill-over” means that unused visa numbers for a given EB
preference are re-allocated to the next category. In recent years, spillover
from EB-1 has helped the EB-2 category tremendously. But Mr. Oppenheim
believes that all EB-1 visa numbers will be consumed within the category
this year. On top of that, due to the government’s heavy promotion of
investor visas, the EB-5 category will likely exhaust their allotment as
well.
So all of these have painted a bleak future for EB-2 for the remainder of FY
-2012. Coincidentally, there is now a petition proposing a thorough
investigation into EB-1C, reserved for multinational managers or executives.
A group has set up a petition to Congress: Stop EB1 C ABUSE and FRAUDULENT
filing. Here is what the petition says:
We would like to appraise you of a particular area of United States
Immigration law that has a huge potential of fraud and misrepresentation
along with being unfairly biased in favor of the people who choose to abuse
it. We are talking about the Employment-based first preference category EB1C
(International Managers). As you are already probably aware, the
requirements for eligibility in that category is just a year of overseas
managerial experience in a company that conducts business in both US and
abroad. We are sure you will agree that compared to the fair and stringent
requirements of EB1A (persons of exceptional ability) and EB1B (outstanding
researchers), this is a rather simple qualification to prove. Moreover it
opens up avenues for fraud and misrepresentation particularly by overseas
companies doing business in USA to unfairly take advantage of this simple
requirement.
In some cases, a journey from L1 visa to EB1C green card does appear to be
much shorter, compared to those who studied in the U.S. for a degree and
then had to wait many years for their EB2 or EB3 green cards. On the other
hand, there are indeed people who worked really hard overseas, climbed up
the ranks, and eventually got transferred to the States as managers. So I
hope the petition, if fruitful, will help block the loopholes where (
staffing) companies simply assign manager titles to people for the purpose
of gaining an advantage in immigration, rather than closing the door for
legitimate candidates.
