h*i
2 楼
想看看显示器啥的
O*z
3 楼
GM审的，最后percentile 32%。还值得再投吗？是不是差的太远了？
n*y
4 楼
Your turn.
【在 d****o 的大作中提到】
: 版上一片戾气。
: 都要过节了，说些开心的事嘛。
【在 d****o 的大作中提到】
: 版上一片戾气。
: 都要过节了，说些开心的事嘛。
G*h
5 楼
不算太差了。感觉这个分数段的问题应该是 fixable 的。
再投的话，可能上，也可能不上。
但不再投的话，肯定不会上。
再投的话，可能上，也可能不上。
但不再投的话，肯定不会上。
B*1
6 楼
+1
【在 n********y 的大作中提到】
: Your turn.
【在 n********y 的大作中提到】
: Your turn.
S*9
7 楼
这个分数不算差，尤其是第一次投的。
肯定修改了再投，把每个reviewer的意见好好看看，不要仓促修回
肯定修改了再投，把每个reviewer的意见好好看看，不要仓促修回
z*c
8 楼
虎妈老大这种档次还是算了，丢不起那人。
如果到了Angela那种档次的，低两档的，也行 ：）
如果到了Angela那种档次的，低两档的，也行 ：）
A*y
9 楼
My fist submission is 40%. I lowered by 37%tile the 2nd time. You never
know if you don't resubmit.
know if you don't resubmit.
d*o
10 楼
我没啥好 兽 的呀。
+1
【在 B******1 的大作中提到】
: +1
+1
【在 B******1 的大作中提到】
: +1
s*y
11 楼
BSO ah BSO :)
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】
: My fist submission is 40%. I lowered by 37%tile the 2nd time. You never
: know if you don't resubmit.
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】
: My fist submission is 40%. I lowered by 37%tile the 2nd time. You never
: know if you don't resubmit.
s*n
12 楼
Always always revise and send back.
A*y
13 楼
Not really, just got my award letter. The funding level is at 83% for
modular budget...I don't know how I can hire people with this budget.
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: BSO ah BSO :)
modular budget...I don't know how I can hire people with this budget.
【在 s******y 的大作中提到】
: BSO ah BSO :)
H*e
14 楼
My suggestion is to figure out what is the real problem in the proposal. I
saw 40% got it in resubmission. When it is 30%-40%, there are two
possibilities:
1. It is a good one but there are some key issues not solved. I read it but
this is the right score. They are good grant but also with problems. When
they fix it, I respect it. This happen every once a while.
2. It is a very bad one. I may not really read the whole thing. I score it
by select a few things to complete my duty. As you see, every one know how
to write grant now. Many proposals look so good and I cannot even find a
way to trash them. However, they are trash. So it does not mean that's all
the problem on the reviewers' comments. Next round, I can easily find more
(I am allowed). Frankly, this is very common. 40% to 35% to 30% to 25%...
.In my mind, this is not a fundable project. No matter how many time one
can try, my job is to ensure money not on this kind of grant.
My own recent grant also got 30%. I actually knew the problem beofer. But
I had to submit for reasons. Now I know how to fix it. I will need a few
more data before resub.
saw 40% got it in resubmission. When it is 30%-40%, there are two
possibilities:
1. It is a good one but there are some key issues not solved. I read it but
this is the right score. They are good grant but also with problems. When
they fix it, I respect it. This happen every once a while.
2. It is a very bad one. I may not really read the whole thing. I score it
by select a few things to complete my duty. As you see, every one know how
to write grant now. Many proposals look so good and I cannot even find a
way to trash them. However, they are trash. So it does not mean that's all
the problem on the reviewers' comments. Next round, I can easily find more
(I am allowed). Frankly, this is very common. 40% to 35% to 30% to 25%...
.In my mind, this is not a fundable project. No matter how many time one
can try, my job is to ensure money not on this kind of grant.
My own recent grant also got 30%. I actually knew the problem beofer. But
I had to submit for reasons. Now I know how to fix it. I will need a few
more data before resub.
H*N
15 楼
Of course you should re-submit. Try to address all the critiques, but with a
focus on the important ones. Don't rush back in if you are asked for more
preliminary data and you need time to get that done.
focus on the important ones. Don't rush back in if you are asked for more
preliminary data and you need time to get that done.
r*y
16 楼
no doubt that you should resubmit, but anything could happen, including that
you may even get a worse score than the one for your 1st submission,
particularly when they change reviewers, and the new reviewers conducted
totally inconsistent reviews of your resubmission. I myself, and some PIs I
know, have this kind of experience.
Also, although NIH does not require you should resubmit it within one year,
I suggest you do so. I ever resubmitted one beyond one year, and one major
reviewer said something bad about the delay of resubmission, and my proposal
was totally killed. this is just my personal experience, but it should be
helpful for junior investigators.
you may even get a worse score than the one for your 1st submission,
particularly when they change reviewers, and the new reviewers conducted
totally inconsistent reviews of your resubmission. I myself, and some PIs I
know, have this kind of experience.
Also, although NIH does not require you should resubmit it within one year,
I suggest you do so. I ever resubmitted one beyond one year, and one major
reviewer said something bad about the delay of resubmission, and my proposal
was totally killed. this is just my personal experience, but it should be
helpful for junior investigators.
相关阅读
老板因为我请假，拿经费威胁人了从影响因子的衰落，看美国学科的灭亡为什么天天骂生物还有那么多人学生物？求问reference manager的用法。人类基因研究计画总监佛朗西斯․科林博士指──「同性恋并 (转载)求生物信息方向审稿机会11g又上新闻联播了a wild guess生物适合low maintenance 的人来搞求文献，多谢！Informa Healthcare access needed.犹他大学 周围环境怎么样？elife revised submission 求教 （有包子）FDA 的staff fellow天津医大那个National CRCenter for Cancer不是自封的，国家认证求一篇文章，谢谢！求救 calcium fluxImageJ 求助祝贺咱国生物博士后夫妻双双进入工业界好工作！【录像】两位生物博士Dr.史地夫,Dr.辉成功找到好工作！see how good the job marker is