h*i
2 楼
想看看显示器啥的
O*z
3 楼
GM审的,最后percentile 32%。还值得再投吗?是不是差的太远了?
G*h
5 楼
不算太差了。感觉这个分数段的问题应该是 fixable 的。
再投的话,可能上,也可能不上。
但不再投的话,肯定不会上。
再投的话,可能上,也可能不上。
但不再投的话,肯定不会上。
S*9
7 楼
这个分数不算差,尤其是第一次投的。
肯定修改了再投,把每个reviewer的意见好好看看,不要仓促修回
肯定修改了再投,把每个reviewer的意见好好看看,不要仓促修回
z*c
8 楼
虎妈老大这种档次还是算了,丢不起那人。
如果到了Angela那种档次的,低两档的,也行 :)
如果到了Angela那种档次的,低两档的,也行 :)
A*y
9 楼
My fist submission is 40%. I lowered by 37%tile the 2nd time. You never
know if you don't resubmit.
know if you don't resubmit.
s*n
12 楼
Always always revise and send back.
H*e
14 楼
My suggestion is to figure out what is the real problem in the proposal. I
saw 40% got it in resubmission. When it is 30%-40%, there are two
possibilities:
1. It is a good one but there are some key issues not solved. I read it but
this is the right score. They are good grant but also with problems. When
they fix it, I respect it. This happen every once a while.
2. It is a very bad one. I may not really read the whole thing. I score it
by select a few things to complete my duty. As you see, every one know how
to write grant now. Many proposals look so good and I cannot even find a
way to trash them. However, they are trash. So it does not mean that's all
the problem on the reviewers' comments. Next round, I can easily find more
(I am allowed). Frankly, this is very common. 40% to 35% to 30% to 25%...
.In my mind, this is not a fundable project. No matter how many time one
can try, my job is to ensure money not on this kind of grant.
My own recent grant also got 30%. I actually knew the problem beofer. But
I had to submit for reasons. Now I know how to fix it. I will need a few
more data before resub.
saw 40% got it in resubmission. When it is 30%-40%, there are two
possibilities:
1. It is a good one but there are some key issues not solved. I read it but
this is the right score. They are good grant but also with problems. When
they fix it, I respect it. This happen every once a while.
2. It is a very bad one. I may not really read the whole thing. I score it
by select a few things to complete my duty. As you see, every one know how
to write grant now. Many proposals look so good and I cannot even find a
way to trash them. However, they are trash. So it does not mean that's all
the problem on the reviewers' comments. Next round, I can easily find more
(I am allowed). Frankly, this is very common. 40% to 35% to 30% to 25%...
.In my mind, this is not a fundable project. No matter how many time one
can try, my job is to ensure money not on this kind of grant.
My own recent grant also got 30%. I actually knew the problem beofer. But
I had to submit for reasons. Now I know how to fix it. I will need a few
more data before resub.
H*N
15 楼
Of course you should re-submit. Try to address all the critiques, but with a
focus on the important ones. Don't rush back in if you are asked for more
preliminary data and you need time to get that done.
focus on the important ones. Don't rush back in if you are asked for more
preliminary data and you need time to get that done.
r*y
16 楼
no doubt that you should resubmit, but anything could happen, including that
you may even get a worse score than the one for your 1st submission,
particularly when they change reviewers, and the new reviewers conducted
totally inconsistent reviews of your resubmission. I myself, and some PIs I
know, have this kind of experience.
Also, although NIH does not require you should resubmit it within one year,
I suggest you do so. I ever resubmitted one beyond one year, and one major
reviewer said something bad about the delay of resubmission, and my proposal
was totally killed. this is just my personal experience, but it should be
helpful for junior investigators.
you may even get a worse score than the one for your 1st submission,
particularly when they change reviewers, and the new reviewers conducted
totally inconsistent reviews of your resubmission. I myself, and some PIs I
know, have this kind of experience.
Also, although NIH does not require you should resubmit it within one year,
I suggest you do so. I ever resubmitted one beyond one year, and one major
reviewer said something bad about the delay of resubmission, and my proposal
was totally killed. this is just my personal experience, but it should be
helpful for junior investigators.
相关阅读
learn a new english word todayry也就是一个loser吧?饶毅最近开始研究behaviar了?zz饶毅和田刚:同是新一代著名科学家 截然相反的人品Cre小鼠GFP fusion蛋白表达困扰方舟子评论饶毅院士第一轮被刷该不该跟老板要共同一作?菜鸟发包子求教:如何看特定的一段氨基酸序列在蛋白质结构里的位置?饶毅落选院士 施一公表示“不理解”统计一下,大家有多少人收到他/她骂大街的信了命题征文(有包子):屁股决定脑袋这个研究方向怎么样?add error bar to 3D graph大家说说中国科研管理层谁说了算?有关OPT延期和E-VERIFY的事情,求教,希望懂得人讲讲!谢谢别跟风了,国内这些百人千人很多就是joke现在有商业化的带luciferase的shRNA vector卖吗?饶毅宣布永不参选中科院院士要是饶毅H-index真的只有34...好庞大的实验室啊。