J*n
2 楼
I have two proteins, and the binding is not very strong. IP and pull-down
assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
binding?
Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
Many thanks in advance!
assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
binding?
Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
Many thanks in advance!
p*n
3 楼
spr
itc is not good for weak interactions.
sec may work. get a hplc sec column.
Size
【在 J*****n 的大作中提到】
: I have two proteins, and the binding is not very strong. IP and pull-down
: assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
: binding?
: Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
: And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
: exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
: Many thanks in advance!
itc is not good for weak interactions.
sec may work. get a hplc sec column.
Size
【在 J*****n 的大作中提到】
: I have two proteins, and the binding is not very strong. IP and pull-down
: assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
: binding?
: Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
: And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
: exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
: Many thanks in advance!
l*1
5 楼
FRET
A*w
7 楼
For ITC, you need milligrams of protein.
SPR, you need much less.
Another easy one is chemical cross-linking...
SPR, you need much less.
Another easy one is chemical cross-linking...
H*g
8 楼
There are many ways to show protein-protein interaction; However, I would
suggest u to forget any additional in vitro assays. You already got IP and
pull-down, so do not waste time on other in vitro ones.
In your case, if I were the reviewer, I would directly ask for evidence from
other perspectives, in addition to all those in vitro assays. I would ask
for assays testing in vivo, real-time interactions, such as BiFC or FRET, as
well as any evidence demonstrating genetic interaction to support that the
physical interaction is biological meaningful.
Size
【在 J*****n 的大作中提到】
: I have two proteins, and the binding is not very strong. IP and pull-down
: assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
: binding?
: Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
: And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
: exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
: Many thanks in advance!
suggest u to forget any additional in vitro assays. You already got IP and
pull-down, so do not waste time on other in vitro ones.
In your case, if I were the reviewer, I would directly ask for evidence from
other perspectives, in addition to all those in vitro assays. I would ask
for assays testing in vivo, real-time interactions, such as BiFC or FRET, as
well as any evidence demonstrating genetic interaction to support that the
physical interaction is biological meaningful.
Size
【在 J*****n 的大作中提到】
: I have two proteins, and the binding is not very strong. IP and pull-down
: assay showed positive results. But we want to have other evidence of the
: binding?
: Is ITC a good tool to study protein-protein interaction?
: And is there any other approaches to study protein-protein interaction? Size
: exclusion chromatography? SPR? ....
: Many thanks in advance!
J*n
9 楼
Thank you all for the kindly replies.
Two of my proteins, one is 44 kd and another is 67, therefore I do not think
it is appropriate to use FP.
ITC did not give me positive results.
SEC showed binding but the peaks are ambiguous.
We might try MALS...not sure if it will be successful.
Actually, to be more specific, we want to check the binding stoichiometry of
these two proteins. Any suggestion?
Many thanks!
Two of my proteins, one is 44 kd and another is 67, therefore I do not think
it is appropriate to use FP.
ITC did not give me positive results.
SEC showed binding but the peaks are ambiguous.
We might try MALS...not sure if it will be successful.
Actually, to be more specific, we want to check the binding stoichiometry of
these two proteins. Any suggestion?
Many thanks!
相关阅读
Nature chemical biology 审稿时间中科院广州生物研究院NYU Professor Charged (转载)生活在线这杂志到底什么档次啊求建议-实验室 课题冲突请教:计算药物毒性cytotoxicity Cc50 用什么公式比较好 (GraphPad Prism 6)?paper help, Thanks.问做autophagy的同学一些问题Feds: 3 scientists conspired to take Chinese bribes for the (转载)EMBO&eLIFE 重提impact factor弊端A reveiw question about EMBO J近期有谁要找移民律师?Paper help, thanks a lotssDNA to dsDNA conversion这样也行?包子求PAPER开ASM2013,有University of Colorado Denver的同学带着参观下生物学界什么时候也出个张译唐有没有人需要请律师办绿卡?Paper help (cell host & microbe)