x*s
2 楼
不可以哦！！
x*t
3 楼
如果3个aim，每个里面再有subaim的话，很容易就超过page limits了，要求不超过12
页。。。2个aim可以么？每个里面有三个subaim
多谢
页。。。2个aim可以么？每个里面有三个subaim
多谢
B*n
4 楼
哈哈，再吹点龙虾，螃蟹吧
【在 A*****a 的大作中提到】
: 就等飓风把鱼吹到家门口了
【在 A*****a 的大作中提到】
: 就等飓风把鱼吹到家门口了
i*a
5 楼
very cute, haa
b*z
6 楼
R01也是12页，要求的内容更多
12
【在 x*******t 的大作中提到】
: 如果3个aim，每个里面再有subaim的话，很容易就超过page limits了，要求不超过12
: 页。。。2个aim可以么？每个里面有三个subaim
: 多谢
12
【在 x*******t 的大作中提到】
: 如果3个aim，每个里面再有subaim的话，很容易就超过page limits了，要求不超过12
: 页。。。2个aim可以么？每个里面有三个subaim
: 多谢
a*n
7 楼
哈哈
v3
8 楼
1 是星战么？
4 是啥？
5 是啥？
9 是特兰克斯？
10 是啥？
【在 x**********s 的大作中提到】
: 不可以哦！！
4 是啥？
5 是啥？
9 是特兰克斯？
10 是啥？
【在 x**********s 的大作中提到】
: 不可以哦！！
x*t
9 楼
其实去除background和preliminary data剩下的实验设计部分占的也不多，想多写点，
又超了
【在 b*********z 的大作中提到】
: R01也是12页，要求的内容更多
:
: 12
又超了
【在 b*********z 的大作中提到】
: R01也是12页，要求的内容更多
:
: 12
g*i
10 楼
1是火影角色我爱罗
【在 v3 的大作中提到】
: 1 是星战么？
: 4 是啥？
: 5 是啥？
: 9 是特兰克斯？
: 10 是啥？
【在 v3 的大作中提到】
: 1 是星战么？
: 4 是啥？
: 5 是啥？
: 9 是特兰克斯？
: 10 是啥？
b*z
11 楼
其实你的K99评委可能只看20分钟，关键是你的big picture 能不能让评委20分钟内看
出来，写得多评委反而会烦
【在 x*******t 的大作中提到】
: 其实去除background和preliminary data剩下的实验设计部分占的也不多，想多写点，
: 又超了
出来，写得多评委反而会烦
【在 x*******t 的大作中提到】
: 其实去除background和preliminary data剩下的实验设计部分占的也不多，想多写点，
: 又超了
s*e
12 楼
9是Final Fantacy的克劳德
x*t
13 楼
good to know, thanks
【在 b*********z 的大作中提到】
: 其实你的K99评委可能只看20分钟，关键是你的big picture 能不能让评委20分钟内看
: 出来，写得多评委反而会烦
【在 b*********z 的大作中提到】
: 其实你的K99评委可能只看20分钟，关键是你的big picture 能不能让评委20分钟内看
: 出来，写得多评委反而会烦
p*w
14 楼
今年的 cosplay/anime 俺就准备去参加了
【在 x**********s 的大作中提到】
: 不可以哦！！
【在 x**********s 的大作中提到】
: 不可以哦！！
s*9
15 楼
新的格式不是只有signficance, innovation,approach，哪里来的background部分
【在 x*******t 的大作中提到】
: 其实去除background和preliminary data剩下的实验设计部分占的也不多，想多写点，
: 又超了
【在 x*******t 的大作中提到】
: 其实去除background和preliminary data剩下的实验设计部分占的也不多，想多写点，
: 又超了
p*n
16 楼
6是春丽还是孙小美？ 喜欢
A*y
17 楼
Your significance and innovation is the most important part (other than
specific aims). If you can not hook the reviewers after the aim page,
signifciance, and innovation, your grant will be in trouble. Look at some
sample R01s.
specific aims). If you can not hook the reviewers after the aim page,
signifciance, and innovation, your grant will be in trouble. Look at some
sample R01s.
B*e
18 楼
春麗實在太可愛了。
P*d
19 楼
My two cents (or 5) in addition to Arty's and bomberblitz's advice:
1. 突出框架。
(1) 不厌其烦地确保每一个段落，每一个句群的最开始，都是一个pointer ("In order
to control for XXX", or "I consider three possibilities...")。如果哪一部分
的pointer加得很困难，说明那一块还没组织好。
(2) Enumerate when possible. "I consider three possibilities. First, ...
Second, ... Third, ..." is easier on the reader than "There are multiple
possibilities. For example, ... Furthermore, ... In addition, ..."
(3) For each section, highlight one or two sentences in bold, so that
scanning through these sentences is a quick reminder of the highlights of
the proposal. This will force you to articulate the high-level points that
bomberblitz refers to, as well as the global flow (you have to say A first
so that B makes sense).
(4) Summarize, summarize, summarize. Summarize as much as you use leading
pointers.
(5) With these things occupying space in your precious 6 pages on the Aims,
it'll help force out the unnecessary and agitating details.
2. Use general terms and avoid jargons in your small field. Every time I
read gene names in an organism that I haven't worked on, it gives me a
headache. So I always say "the XXX kinase" instead of just XXX.
3. Along the same line of making life easier for your reviewers, make it
easier for them to find things. Instead of saying "see below" or "as
mentioned before", say "see also section 2.2" or "as discussed in section 1.
3.2". (see also 1.2 and 1.3)
4. Use NIH lingo. "A major GAP in the field", "INNOVATIVE approach based
on cutting edge XXX". These NIH jargons can be found in their explanations
on the structure of the proposals and the review process. Feed the reviewers
the words you want them to say. Prepare the summary sentences in these
jargons that your reviewers can copy and paste, and repeat each a couple
times throughout the proposal (see also 1.3)
5. Give the training plan as much thought as the research plan. Emphasize
on the "VALUE ADDED" (again, NIH lingo, see 4).
1. 突出框架。
(1) 不厌其烦地确保每一个段落，每一个句群的最开始，都是一个pointer ("In order
to control for XXX", or "I consider three possibilities...")。如果哪一部分
的pointer加得很困难，说明那一块还没组织好。
(2) Enumerate when possible. "I consider three possibilities. First, ...
Second, ... Third, ..." is easier on the reader than "There are multiple
possibilities. For example, ... Furthermore, ... In addition, ..."
(3) For each section, highlight one or two sentences in bold, so that
scanning through these sentences is a quick reminder of the highlights of
the proposal. This will force you to articulate the high-level points that
bomberblitz refers to, as well as the global flow (you have to say A first
so that B makes sense).
(4) Summarize, summarize, summarize. Summarize as much as you use leading
pointers.
(5) With these things occupying space in your precious 6 pages on the Aims,
it'll help force out the unnecessary and agitating details.
2. Use general terms and avoid jargons in your small field. Every time I
read gene names in an organism that I haven't worked on, it gives me a
headache. So I always say "the XXX kinase" instead of just XXX.
3. Along the same line of making life easier for your reviewers, make it
easier for them to find things. Instead of saying "see below" or "as
mentioned before", say "see also section 2.2" or "as discussed in section 1.
3.2". (see also 1.2 and 1.3)
4. Use NIH lingo. "A major GAP in the field", "INNOVATIVE approach based
on cutting edge XXX". These NIH jargons can be found in their explanations
on the structure of the proposals and the review process. Feed the reviewers
the words you want them to say. Prepare the summary sentences in these
jargons that your reviewers can copy and paste, and repeat each a couple
times throughout the proposal (see also 1.3)
5. Give the training plan as much thought as the research plan. Emphasize
on the "VALUE ADDED" (again, NIH lingo, see 4).
y*t
20 楼
4是什么？
x*t
21 楼
这个要求是必须固定的么？有点的background交代理解上应该好点吧，当然可以把
background糅合到其他里面
【在 s****9 的大作中提到】
: 新的格式不是只有signficance, innovation,approach，哪里来的background部分
background糅合到其他里面
【在 s****9 的大作中提到】
: 新的格式不是只有signficance, innovation,approach，哪里来的background部分
A*y
22 楼
Background should be to the point of the grant, if you say a single word
more than you need to, you will be in trouble. Yes, you should incorporte
them into the talking point.
【在 x*******t 的大作中提到】
: 这个要求是必须固定的么？有点的background交代理解上应该好点吧，当然可以把
: background糅合到其他里面
more than you need to, you will be in trouble. Yes, you should incorporte
them into the talking point.
【在 x*******t 的大作中提到】
: 这个要求是必须固定的么？有点的background交代理解上应该好点吧，当然可以把
: background糅合到其他里面
x*t
23 楼
十分感谢，我目前的proposal的结构是这样的
Aims 1. XXXXXX
Rationale
subaim 1. (mentor stage)
a little bit description or overview blabla, something like that
methods
predicted results and interpretations
potential difficulties
significance
subaim 2..............
有啥好建议么？应该在那部分强调一下？现在看来significance应该在多写点，
innovation是不是体现在predicted result and interpretation里面？
多谢啦
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】
: Background should be to the point of the grant, if you say a single word
: more than you need to, you will be in trouble. Yes, you should incorporte
: them into the talking point.
Aims 1. XXXXXX
Rationale
subaim 1. (mentor stage)
a little bit description or overview blabla, something like that
methods
predicted results and interpretations
potential difficulties
significance
subaim 2..............
有啥好建议么？应该在那部分强调一下？现在看来significance应该在多写点，
innovation是不是体现在predicted result and interpretation里面？
多谢啦
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】
: Background should be to the point of the grant, if you say a single word
: more than you need to, you will be in trouble. Yes, you should incorporte
: them into the talking point.
A*y
24 楼
Innovation should be about your approach? or what you proposed to study?
The rule as far as I know is that your significant and innovation should not
be longer than 1.5 pages.
The rule as far as I know is that your significant and innovation should not
be longer than 1.5 pages.
x*t
25 楼
i think innovation should be related to what i am going to study, cause the
approaches are all common in this field (but i agree not all the lab can set
up all the assays....). Saying something that my study can solve the
molecular mechanism of xxx field and also provide detailed information about
xxx disease would be important for the innovation part. right?
thanks for your suggestion,
not
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】
: Innovation should be about your approach? or what you proposed to study?
: The rule as far as I know is that your significant and innovation should not
: be longer than 1.5 pages.
approaches are all common in this field (but i agree not all the lab can set
up all the assays....). Saying something that my study can solve the
molecular mechanism of xxx field and also provide detailed information about
xxx disease would be important for the innovation part. right?
thanks for your suggestion,
not
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】
: Innovation should be about your approach? or what you proposed to study?
: The rule as far as I know is that your significant and innovation should not
: be longer than 1.5 pages.
l*1
26 楼
CS or Experimental Physics likes Optics PhD graduated what s/he thinks while
s/he read your proposal ? just ask nearby that background PD
plus that her/his thought as stuff to your that proposal then it will be
uncommon approach in wet bio field which equals innovation
please refer
How to Make a Computer from a Living Cell
Genetic logic gates will enable biologists to program cells for chemical
production and disease detection.
on March 28, 201
//www.technologyreview.com/news/512901/how-to-make-a-computer-from-a-living-
cell/
or 考古下买卖提的旧贴
Biology版 - 哪位能科普一下ZHUANG的单分子荧光
muduo
2012-03-17 22:32:15
http://www.weiming.info/zhuti/Biology/31646749/
or
Biology版 - 业内人士来说说single molecule吧
ilovebmw
2011-12-06 01:04:37
http://www.weiming.info/zhuti/Biology/31611331/
or
Biology版 - ms小亮要评院士了？！
popeye1983
2011-04-28
http://ipv6.weiming.info/zhuti/Biology/31510275/
the
set
about
【在 x*******t 的大作中提到】
: i think innovation should be related to what i am going to study, cause the
: approaches are all common in this field (but i agree not all the lab can set
: up all the assays....). Saying something that my study can solve the
: molecular mechanism of xxx field and also provide detailed information about
: xxx disease would be important for the innovation part. right?
: thanks for your suggestion,
:
: not
s/he read your proposal ? just ask nearby that background PD
plus that her/his thought as stuff to your that proposal then it will be
uncommon approach in wet bio field which equals innovation
please refer
How to Make a Computer from a Living Cell
Genetic logic gates will enable biologists to program cells for chemical
production and disease detection.
on March 28, 201
//www.technologyreview.com/news/512901/how-to-make-a-computer-from-a-living-
cell/
or 考古下买卖提的旧贴
Biology版 - 哪位能科普一下ZHUANG的单分子荧光
muduo
2012-03-17 22:32:15
http://www.weiming.info/zhuti/Biology/31646749/
or
Biology版 - 业内人士来说说single molecule吧
ilovebmw
2011-12-06 01:04:37
http://www.weiming.info/zhuti/Biology/31611331/
or
Biology版 - ms小亮要评院士了？！
popeye1983
2011-04-28
http://ipv6.weiming.info/zhuti/Biology/31510275/
the
set
about
【在 x*******t 的大作中提到】
: i think innovation should be related to what i am going to study, cause the
: approaches are all common in this field (but i agree not all the lab can set
: up all the assays....). Saying something that my study can solve the
: molecular mechanism of xxx field and also provide detailed information about
: xxx disease would be important for the innovation part. right?
: thanks for your suggestion,
:
: not
s*9
27 楼
Depends on different people's study. In my boss's proposal, significance +
innovation are almost 3 pages. He incorporate many rationale and background
into this part.
not
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】
: Innovation should be about your approach? or what you proposed to study?
: The rule as far as I know is that your significant and innovation should not
: be longer than 1.5 pages.
innovation are almost 3 pages. He incorporate many rationale and background
into this part.
not
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】
: Innovation should be about your approach? or what you proposed to study?
: The rule as far as I know is that your significant and innovation should not
: be longer than 1.5 pages.
p*l
28 楼
My significant and innovation is about 2.5 pages.
I like to discuss background, limitations of previous work and remaining
problems in Significant to establish motivation. Innovation is basically
what I want to do and why my way will solve the problem. Approach is just
details.
I like to discuss background, limitations of previous work and remaining
problems in Significant to establish motivation. Innovation is basically
what I want to do and why my way will solve the problem. Approach is just
details.
相关阅读
一个条件性细胞剔除模式小鼠谁给帮忙查查现在实时的journal impact factor千老近期的工作说个认识的人生物硕士找工作，鼓励大家北美生物WSN也性侵禁锢未成年少女了，还是夫妻店 (转载)学生4选一续向FDA说不，联合抵制转基因三文鱼。有几个男人像我一样ZT一事不解，生物信息学的AP才10万刀，还干个屁？请教几个用来产生 membrane proteins设备的价格 (转载)对大多数薄厚来说，hard working leads to sucess 的日子早就一去不复返了T7 tag抗体求推荐。paper helpscience 倒底多久有回音呀.他人的成功往往是不能复制的尴尬：能向自己审稿作者教授厚脸皮要推荐信嘛？ (转载)PI 与博士后的五个层次及各层次中的关系谁记得一篇或几篇植物与微生物共生提取蛋白的文章Report on Science showing impact of one-child policy on individuals in China破杂志是这样提高impact factor