比较基因组学问题请教# Biology - 生物学
v*n
1 楼
Sorry to see the post about interview experience in
Google has been deleted by the OP. The whole purpose
of my post won't be upon whether we should obey the
NDA or whether we should share the interview questions.
As the title, man be man, so his code should be honored
anyways. I do appericiate those who post their
interview experience ignoring the NDA yet I also feel
grateful for people who contribute by posting their own
experience without concrete context.
However, I do feel bad about certain people who are
desperately seeking for the questions in order to
prepare for their interviews at Google/Amazon/Microsoft/You
name it. What makes a good candidate, IMHO, is not how many
questions he memorized before coming down for the interview,
but more would be based upon his professionalism, intelligence,
and/or even his personality.
The feeling gets even worse when I saw experienced people
on this board still value more about the concrete questions
instead of anything else. Again just IMHO, unless you are
fresh, just out of college, these questions won't help you
a lot given that they are designed to raise the bar and test
the entry level programmers. What makes veteran employee more
valuable is the experience that could lead to their visions
of the industry and their own careers. Thus, a more important
question should be "where would you see yourself in 2 years,
5 years, or 10 years?". Being a coding guru (a.k.a. coding
monkey) does not hurt but isn't there something else could
be pursued?
Just typing down my random thoughts during lunch and please
help correct me.
Google has been deleted by the OP. The whole purpose
of my post won't be upon whether we should obey the
NDA or whether we should share the interview questions.
As the title, man be man, so his code should be honored
anyways. I do appericiate those who post their
interview experience ignoring the NDA yet I also feel
grateful for people who contribute by posting their own
experience without concrete context.
However, I do feel bad about certain people who are
desperately seeking for the questions in order to
prepare for their interviews at Google/Amazon/Microsoft/You
name it. What makes a good candidate, IMHO, is not how many
questions he memorized before coming down for the interview,
but more would be based upon his professionalism, intelligence,
and/or even his personality.
The feeling gets even worse when I saw experienced people
on this board still value more about the concrete questions
instead of anything else. Again just IMHO, unless you are
fresh, just out of college, these questions won't help you
a lot given that they are designed to raise the bar and test
the entry level programmers. What makes veteran employee more
valuable is the experience that could lead to their visions
of the industry and their own careers. Thus, a more important
question should be "where would you see yourself in 2 years,
5 years, or 10 years?". Being a coding guru (a.k.a. coding
monkey) does not hurt but isn't there something else could
be pursued?
Just typing down my random thoughts during lunch and please
help correct me.
