文章被拒，求建议# Biology - 生物学
s*t
1 楼
Bk.(Engineering)
1)1 book,6 journals(4 English,2 Chinese), 11 Conference papers(all English),
several abstracts. Citations 65+(most for Chinese papers)
2)6 letters(three members of NAE)
3)review 14 times for 6 journals
(authorship 没有承认很奇怪，大家都是怎么提供发表文章的？对io说you may submit然后几条，是不是就是需要提供满足每一条？）
RFE－－XM 1082
(iv) Judge of others
Has been meet
(v) Evidence of original and contribution…
You have provided evidence of the beneficiary’s nineteen co-authored
publications and presentations, one issued patent and one pending patent and
six reference letters.
The Criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not
show that the beneficiary has made original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field. To assistant in determining whether
the beneficiary’s contributions are original you may submit:
** Objective documentary evidence of the beneficiary’s contribution to
their academic field
** Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary’s work original
** Testimony and/ or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s original scientific or scholarly research contributions to
their academic field( Must provide as much detail as possible about the
beneficiary’s contribution and must explain, in detail. How the
contribution was original(not merely replicating the work of others).
** Evidence of the beneficiary’s original contribution has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited
** Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to: Contracts with companies…,
licensed technolog being used…, patents currently being utilizted..
** any other relevant evidence
(vi) Evidence of authorship
You have provided evidence of the beneficiary’s nineteen co-authored
publications and presentations.
This criterior has not been met because the evidence does not shown that
the articles were published in scholarly journals with international
circulation. To assistant determining that the articles were published in
scholarly journals with international circulation, you may submit:
** Documentary evidence to establish the journals are circulated
internationally
*if the articles were published in print, the evidence must
relate to the printed publication
* if the articles were published online, the evidence must
relate to the websites
** any other relevant evidence
Totality显然不过，需要证明recongized internationally as outstanding in the
academic field specified in the petition.
接下来就说我的review record不能establish这个，需要提供编辑证明信什么的。
谢谢大家帮忙分析了。
1)1 book,6 journals(4 English,2 Chinese), 11 Conference papers(all English),
several abstracts. Citations 65+(most for Chinese papers)
2)6 letters(three members of NAE)
3)review 14 times for 6 journals
(authorship 没有承认很奇怪，大家都是怎么提供发表文章的？对io说you may submit然后几条，是不是就是需要提供满足每一条？）
RFE－－XM 1082
(iv) Judge of others
Has been meet
(v) Evidence of original and contribution…
You have provided evidence of the beneficiary’s nineteen co-authored
publications and presentations, one issued patent and one pending patent and
six reference letters.
The Criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not
show that the beneficiary has made original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field. To assistant in determining whether
the beneficiary’s contributions are original you may submit:
** Objective documentary evidence of the beneficiary’s contribution to
their academic field
** Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary’s work original
** Testimony and/ or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s original scientific or scholarly research contributions to
their academic field( Must provide as much detail as possible about the
beneficiary’s contribution and must explain, in detail. How the
contribution was original(not merely replicating the work of others).
** Evidence of the beneficiary’s original contribution has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited
** Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to: Contracts with companies…,
licensed technolog being used…, patents currently being utilizted..
** any other relevant evidence
(vi) Evidence of authorship
You have provided evidence of the beneficiary’s nineteen co-authored
publications and presentations.
This criterior has not been met because the evidence does not shown that
the articles were published in scholarly journals with international
circulation. To assistant determining that the articles were published in
scholarly journals with international circulation, you may submit:
** Documentary evidence to establish the journals are circulated
internationally
*if the articles were published in print, the evidence must
relate to the printed publication
* if the articles were published online, the evidence must
relate to the websites
** any other relevant evidence
Totality显然不过，需要证明recongized internationally as outstanding in the
academic field specified in the petition.
接下来就说我的review record不能establish这个，需要提供编辑证明信什么的。
谢谢大家帮忙分析了。
