From nonfood biomass to starch (转载)# ChemEng - 化学工程
a*a
1 楼
10. Media and Coordinating Committee
Throughout 2010, OCEF’s Media and Coordinating Committee continued to
coordinate resource allocation for editing, publishing and designing, and
worked with other groups to create OCEF publicity materials. Below is a
summary of the reports by the four groups under the committee:
10.1 Correspondence Group:
This is my second year working in the Correspondence Group (Who is ‘我’?
The person who worked in the group? May need to change to third person, as
the earlier part of the report seems to be written from a plural ‘we’, and
the first person singular point of view here is confusing.) Work at the
Correspondence Group can be tedious. However, I learned a lot in the past
year and it was a rewarding experience.
10.1.1 Procedure Guide for returning correspondence was finally completed
and, as a result, work at the Correspondence Group became much better
organized than before.
Procedure Guide for returning correspondence was brainstormed among the
group members in March, 2010. We started drafting the Procedure Guide in
May, 2010, and first tried out its implementation in October, 2010. By far
it has streamlined the correspondence work, and it may even benefit work of
other groups (Original Chinese text confusing).
Here I would like to thank two long-time volunteers, Nanguyu and
Shenguyoulan. It is their support and commitment to the work on returning
correspondence and Procedure Guide that enabled us to make steady progress
with our work.
10.1.2. Remarkable increase in letters from fund recipients who entered
college
Since September 2010, Correspondence Group have received many letters with
college addresses – these letters were from students who received OCEF fund
when in middle-school. There are a few dozens of such letters, much more
than we had received in 2009 when I first worked for the group. I believe
this is a testimony of the effectiveness of OCEF work. To our delight, some
of these students not only wrote letters to express their appreciation
towards OCEF, but also joined OCEF to work as volunteers. There are two
volunteers (both from Xinjiang province) in the Correspondence Group who
used to be OCEF funding recipients and later got accepted by colleges. They
then applied to become OCEF volunteers themselves and helped with writing letters to
reply to OCEF funded students in their middle schools.
Throughout 2010, OCEF’s Media and Coordinating Committee continued to
coordinate resource allocation for editing, publishing and designing, and
worked with other groups to create OCEF publicity materials. Below is a
summary of the reports by the four groups under the committee:
10.1 Correspondence Group:
This is my second year working in the Correspondence Group (Who is ‘我’?
The person who worked in the group? May need to change to third person, as
the earlier part of the report seems to be written from a plural ‘we’, and
the first person singular point of view here is confusing.) Work at the
Correspondence Group can be tedious. However, I learned a lot in the past
year and it was a rewarding experience.
10.1.1 Procedure Guide for returning correspondence was finally completed
and, as a result, work at the Correspondence Group became much better
organized than before.
Procedure Guide for returning correspondence was brainstormed among the
group members in March, 2010. We started drafting the Procedure Guide in
May, 2010, and first tried out its implementation in October, 2010. By far
it has streamlined the correspondence work, and it may even benefit work of
other groups (Original Chinese text confusing).
Here I would like to thank two long-time volunteers, Nanguyu and
Shenguyoulan. It is their support and commitment to the work on returning
correspondence and Procedure Guide that enabled us to make steady progress
with our work.
10.1.2. Remarkable increase in letters from fund recipients who entered
college
Since September 2010, Correspondence Group have received many letters with
college addresses – these letters were from students who received OCEF fund
when in middle-school. There are a few dozens of such letters, much more
than we had received in 2009 when I first worked for the group. I believe
this is a testimony of the effectiveness of OCEF work. To our delight, some
of these students not only wrote letters to express their appreciation
towards OCEF, but also joined OCEF to work as volunteers. There are two
volunteers (both from Xinjiang province) in the Correspondence Group who
used to be OCEF funding recipients and later got accepted by colleges. They
then applied to become OCEF volunteers themselves and helped with writing letters to
reply to OCEF funded students in their middle schools.
