美国社区大学general Chemistry课能有多难？# ChemEng - 化学工程
T*y
1 楼
I have two concerns here:
(1) a typo
4.1, bullet 3, sub-bullet 2: 36人, the last percentage there, "25.71%",
should be 36/241=14.94%.
(2) Please help me verify the meaning of "旧书捐赠或者进行第二批新书捐助",
especially the difference between 捐赠 and 捐助. Is the translation below
okay?
"36 schools took full advantage of their libraries or needed urgent help to
replenish their collections, and OCEF will help deliver the donations of
used books or help in buying new books"
======================================================================
4. Relevant Data on the Auditing Procedure
4.1 Financial Aid Project:
In 2010, a total of 38 funded schools were visited, counting to 19.9% of the
funded schools in 2009 (191 schools in total). 588 beneficiaries were
visited, counting to 24.22% of the total 2424 beneficiaries.
After the auditing in 2010, the funding to 11 schools was terminated due to
violations and other reasons, counting to 6.4% of the funded schools in 2009
(191 schools in total).
After the auditing, the funding to 241 students was terminated, counting to
9.93% of the total 2424 beneficiaries. Among them:
140 students belonged to such schools, where the schools had violations and
hence all the students were removed from the funding program. The 140
students count up to 5.77% of the total beneficiaries, 23.81% of the total
audited beneficiaries, and 58.09% of the total beneficiaries who stopped
receiving funding after auditing.
36 students were no longer qualified due to local economic improvements or
other reasons, counting to 1.48% of the total beneficiaries, 6.12% of the
total audited beneficiaries, and 25.71% of the total beneficiaries who
stopped receiving funding after auditing.
34 students were no longer qualified due to household situation improvements
or severe fraudulence, counting to 1.40% of the total beneficiaries, 5.78%
of the total audited beneficiaries, and 14.11% of the total beneficiaries
who stopped receiving funding after auditing.
26 students dropped out and hence were no longer qualified, counting to 1.07
% of the total beneficiaries, 4.42% of the total audited beneficiaries, and
10.79% of the total beneficiaries who stopped receiving funding after
auditing.
5 students were no longer supported due to all the other reasons, counting
to 0.21% of the total beneficiaries, 0.85% of the total audited
beneficiaries, and 2.07% of the total beneficiaries who stopped receiving
funding after auditing.
4.2 Scholarship Project:
In 2010, a total of 17 funded high schools were visited, counting to 58.62%
of the funded schools in 2009 (29 schools in total). 212 beneficiaries were
visited, counting to 39.70% of the total 534 beneficiaries.
After the auditing in 2010, the funding to 4 schools was terminated or put
on hold due to violations and other reasons, counting to 13.79% of the
funded schools in 2009 (29 schools in total).
After the auditing, the funding to 42 students was terminated, counting to
19.81% of the total 534 beneficiaries. Among them:
8 students were no longer qualified due to household situation improvements
or severe fraudulence, counting to 1.50% of the total beneficiaries, 3.77%
of the total audited beneficiaries, and 19.05% of the total beneficiaries
who stopped receiving funding after auditing.
22 students stopped receiving funding because their academic grades did not
meet the requirements, counting to 4.12% of the total beneficiaries, 10.38%
of the total audited beneficiaries, and 52.38% of the total beneficiaries
who stopped receiving funding after auditing.
7 students stopped receiving funding because they received duplicate funding
before, counting to 1.31% of the total beneficiaries, 3.30% of the total
audited beneficiaries, and 16.67% of the total beneficiaries who stopped
receiving funding after auditing.
5 students dropped out or transferred and hence stopped receiving the
funding, counting to 0.94% of the total beneficiaries, 2.36% of the total
audited beneficiaries, and 11.90% of the total beneficiaries who stopped
receiving funding after auditing.
4.3 Temporary Teacher Project:
In 2010, a total of 82 funded temporary teachers were visited, counting to
100% of the funded temporary teachers.
After the auditing in 2010, the funding to 24 temporary teachers was
terminated or put on hold, counting to 29.27% of the funded temporary
teachers. Among them, 22 teachers were no longer qualified due to household
situation's improvements or fraudulence; 1 temporary teacher resigned, and 1
temporary teacher became an official teacher.
Library Project
In 2010, a total of 46 schools were visited, including 39 schools that were
already funded and 7 schools that were expected to be funded. Out of the 46
schools, 36 schools took full advantage of their libraries or needed urgent
help to replenish their collections, and OCEF will help deliver the
donations of used books or help in buying new books; 5 schools had enough
collections and only needed assistance to encourage student reading; the
other 5 schools didn't utilize the libraries much, and OCEF do not plan to
involve these 5 schools in the Library Project.
(1) a typo
4.1, bullet 3, sub-bullet 2: 36人, the last percentage there, "25.71%",
should be 36/241=14.94%.
(2) Please help me verify the meaning of "旧书捐赠或者进行第二批新书捐助",
especially the difference between 捐赠 and 捐助. Is the translation below
okay?
"36 schools took full advantage of their libraries or needed urgent help to
replenish their collections, and OCEF will help deliver the donations of
used books or help in buying new books"
======================================================================
4. Relevant Data on the Auditing Procedure
4.1 Financial Aid Project:
In 2010, a total of 38 funded schools were visited, counting to 19.9% of the
funded schools in 2009 (191 schools in total). 588 beneficiaries were
visited, counting to 24.22% of the total 2424 beneficiaries.
After the auditing in 2010, the funding to 11 schools was terminated due to
violations and other reasons, counting to 6.4% of the funded schools in 2009
(191 schools in total).
After the auditing, the funding to 241 students was terminated, counting to
9.93% of the total 2424 beneficiaries. Among them:
140 students belonged to such schools, where the schools had violations and
hence all the students were removed from the funding program. The 140
students count up to 5.77% of the total beneficiaries, 23.81% of the total
audited beneficiaries, and 58.09% of the total beneficiaries who stopped
receiving funding after auditing.
36 students were no longer qualified due to local economic improvements or
other reasons, counting to 1.48% of the total beneficiaries, 6.12% of the
total audited beneficiaries, and 25.71% of the total beneficiaries who
stopped receiving funding after auditing.
34 students were no longer qualified due to household situation improvements
or severe fraudulence, counting to 1.40% of the total beneficiaries, 5.78%
of the total audited beneficiaries, and 14.11% of the total beneficiaries
who stopped receiving funding after auditing.
26 students dropped out and hence were no longer qualified, counting to 1.07
% of the total beneficiaries, 4.42% of the total audited beneficiaries, and
10.79% of the total beneficiaries who stopped receiving funding after
auditing.
5 students were no longer supported due to all the other reasons, counting
to 0.21% of the total beneficiaries, 0.85% of the total audited
beneficiaries, and 2.07% of the total beneficiaries who stopped receiving
funding after auditing.
4.2 Scholarship Project:
In 2010, a total of 17 funded high schools were visited, counting to 58.62%
of the funded schools in 2009 (29 schools in total). 212 beneficiaries were
visited, counting to 39.70% of the total 534 beneficiaries.
After the auditing in 2010, the funding to 4 schools was terminated or put
on hold due to violations and other reasons, counting to 13.79% of the
funded schools in 2009 (29 schools in total).
After the auditing, the funding to 42 students was terminated, counting to
19.81% of the total 534 beneficiaries. Among them:
8 students were no longer qualified due to household situation improvements
or severe fraudulence, counting to 1.50% of the total beneficiaries, 3.77%
of the total audited beneficiaries, and 19.05% of the total beneficiaries
who stopped receiving funding after auditing.
22 students stopped receiving funding because their academic grades did not
meet the requirements, counting to 4.12% of the total beneficiaries, 10.38%
of the total audited beneficiaries, and 52.38% of the total beneficiaries
who stopped receiving funding after auditing.
7 students stopped receiving funding because they received duplicate funding
before, counting to 1.31% of the total beneficiaries, 3.30% of the total
audited beneficiaries, and 16.67% of the total beneficiaries who stopped
receiving funding after auditing.
5 students dropped out or transferred and hence stopped receiving the
funding, counting to 0.94% of the total beneficiaries, 2.36% of the total
audited beneficiaries, and 11.90% of the total beneficiaries who stopped
receiving funding after auditing.
4.3 Temporary Teacher Project:
In 2010, a total of 82 funded temporary teachers were visited, counting to
100% of the funded temporary teachers.
After the auditing in 2010, the funding to 24 temporary teachers was
terminated or put on hold, counting to 29.27% of the funded temporary
teachers. Among them, 22 teachers were no longer qualified due to household
situation's improvements or fraudulence; 1 temporary teacher resigned, and 1
temporary teacher became an official teacher.
Library Project
In 2010, a total of 46 schools were visited, including 39 schools that were
already funded and 7 schools that were expected to be funded. Out of the 46
schools, 36 schools took full advantage of their libraries or needed urgent
help to replenish their collections, and OCEF will help deliver the
donations of used books or help in buying new books; 5 schools had enough
collections and only needed assistance to encourage student reading; the
other 5 schools didn't utilize the libraries much, and OCEF do not plan to
involve these 5 schools in the Library Project.
