W*i
2 楼
【 以下文字转载自 NewJersey 讨论区 】
发信人: WhateverLi (whateverli), 信区: NewJersey
标 题: 问个在纽约办英国旅游签证的问题
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 17 13:50:01 2014, 美东)
My wife hold H4 visa, Chinese Citizen. Now she tried to apply short term
tourist visa to UK. Any one had similar experience before?
I checked the documents UK government is asking in Beijing. So complicated.
Any difference in NYC?
Thanks a lot.
发信人: WhateverLi (whateverli), 信区: NewJersey
标 题: 问个在纽约办英国旅游签证的问题
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Apr 17 13:50:01 2014, 美东)
My wife hold H4 visa, Chinese Citizen. Now she tried to apply short term
tourist visa to UK. Any one had similar experience before?
I checked the documents UK government is asking in Beijing. So complicated.
Any difference in NYC?
Thanks a lot.
H*i
3 楼
Petition Letter:
Subject: Reform Administrative Procedures for Employment-based Immigration
Process
Dear Mr. President,
We are people who have experience and skills that are complementary to those
of Americans. We are people who spend our best years helping American
companies become more globally competitive. We are people who come from
thousands of miles away to legally pursue our American dreams.
We abide by all U.S. laws and regulations, only to find ourselves one of the most
regulated group of human beings. By immigration laws, we are employment-
based immigration petitioners on second and third preferences, hereafter
abbreviated as EB2/EB3, from very populous countries, versus ROW, which
means “The Rest of the World”.
By law there are a limited number of visas available for EB2 and EB3
petitioners from each country. By law there is also a possibility for EB2
and EB3 petitioners from populous countries to use the under-utilized visa
numbers from less populous countries. We are here not arguing whether it
was fair to give the same 2803 visa quota to countries with over 1 billion
population, such as China and India, and to countries with under 50 thousand
population, such as Monaco and Liechtenstein. We are here to abide by the
laws that were erected by U.S. legislature.
But there is NO law forbidding EB2 and EB3 from populous countries to submit
I-485 petitions. It is the administrative process that artificially
discriminates EB2 and EB3 from populous countries. While ROW EB2 and EB3
can expect to receive their green cards in a matter of several months, we
have to wait year after year after year, and still not allowed to submit our
I-485 petitions.
Submitting I-485 is the third step of the EB2 and EB3 immigration process.
If approved, it will lead to the fourth step, which is receiving a green
card. If not approved, no green card will be issued to the petitioner. It
is the step of issuing a green card that was governed by the visa quota for
each country, not the step of submitting I-485.
Obviously there is a clear line between submitting I-485 and issuing a green
card. But the current EB2 and EB3 immigration process artificially blends
the two separate steps together. USCIS does NOT accept I-485 until
Department of State believes there is a visa quota available for that
petitioner.
Such a practice incurred tremendous pain on us. Metaphorically speaking we
deserve to submit I-485 and wait indoors for our turn to receive a green
card, and it’s inhumane to leave us waiting outdoors in the sun and rain
for years.
We urge you to immediately reform administrative procedures for employment-
based immigration process:
1. Grant EB2 and EB3 petitioners a grace period from the day they become
unemployed. The grace period can be a fixed window of, for example, 6
months, or a floating window, for example, that is proportionally to the
time they have been working in U.S.
a) From the economic perspective, such a grace period will provide
opportunities for other U.S. employers to find out that these newly-
unemployed foreign workers may have exactly the experience and skills that
these companies urgently need. Without such a grace period, if one loses
her or his job, they have to find another job IMMEDIATELY or leave this
country IMMEDIATELY.
b) From the empirical perspective, the longer a foreign worker has been
legally working in U.S., the more she or he is committed to some long-term
investments, such as owning a house or having children born here. It’s
both humane and reasonable to grant them enough time to sell their homes and
re-arrange schooling for their children. Without such a grace period, a
default or fire sale could be the natural consequences, which will worsen
the fragile housing market today.
2. Allow EB2 and EB3 petitioners to submit I-485 forms if we have been
legally working in U.S. for 5 years and/or are 180 days since our I-140
petitions have been approved.
a) In the first place, the current process unnecessarily punishes us
simply because we were born in a populous country. A similar EB2 from ROW
would have received her green card within several months. We understand the
reason to wait for the green card. But there is no reason for us to wait
to file our I-485 petitions.
b) In the second place, we are not challenging any law. We are simply
asking for an administrative convenience. The law sets a visa quota for
petitioners from each country. We respect the law and, as always, we abide
by the law. But the law does NOT forbid submitting I-485 applications.
c) In the third place, we are not even challenging the Visa Bulletin.
For EB2 and EB3 petitioners from populous countries, every month, Mr.
Charles Oppenheim in the Department of State decides the cut-off dates so
that nobody can file I-485 form if their “Priority Date” is not prior to
the cut-ff date in Visa Bulletin. We respect the Visa Bulletin, but we
believe the Visa Bulletin was established to control the issuance of green
cards, rather than to control the filing of I-485.
To summarize, we urge you to reform the current inhuman immigration
procedures by allowing a grace period and separating I-485 filing from Visa
Bulletin. Such two simple and small steps will significantly relieve us of
tremendous pressures that we face every day!
Why the white house should help us? 各位兄弟姐妹,请大家使劲想,使劲帮忙!
Subject: Reform Administrative Procedures for Employment-based Immigration
Process
Dear Mr. President,
We are people who have experience and skills that are complementary to those
of Americans. We are people who spend our best years helping American
companies become more globally competitive. We are people who come from
thousands of miles away to legally pursue our American dreams.
We abide by all U.S. laws and regulations, only to find ourselves one of the most
regulated group of human beings. By immigration laws, we are employment-
based immigration petitioners on second and third preferences, hereafter
abbreviated as EB2/EB3, from very populous countries, versus ROW, which
means “The Rest of the World”.
By law there are a limited number of visas available for EB2 and EB3
petitioners from each country. By law there is also a possibility for EB2
and EB3 petitioners from populous countries to use the under-utilized visa
numbers from less populous countries. We are here not arguing whether it
was fair to give the same 2803 visa quota to countries with over 1 billion
population, such as China and India, and to countries with under 50 thousand
population, such as Monaco and Liechtenstein. We are here to abide by the
laws that were erected by U.S. legislature.
But there is NO law forbidding EB2 and EB3 from populous countries to submit
I-485 petitions. It is the administrative process that artificially
discriminates EB2 and EB3 from populous countries. While ROW EB2 and EB3
can expect to receive their green cards in a matter of several months, we
have to wait year after year after year, and still not allowed to submit our
I-485 petitions.
Submitting I-485 is the third step of the EB2 and EB3 immigration process.
If approved, it will lead to the fourth step, which is receiving a green
card. If not approved, no green card will be issued to the petitioner. It
is the step of issuing a green card that was governed by the visa quota for
each country, not the step of submitting I-485.
Obviously there is a clear line between submitting I-485 and issuing a green
card. But the current EB2 and EB3 immigration process artificially blends
the two separate steps together. USCIS does NOT accept I-485 until
Department of State believes there is a visa quota available for that
petitioner.
Such a practice incurred tremendous pain on us. Metaphorically speaking we
deserve to submit I-485 and wait indoors for our turn to receive a green
card, and it’s inhumane to leave us waiting outdoors in the sun and rain
for years.
We urge you to immediately reform administrative procedures for employment-
based immigration process:
1. Grant EB2 and EB3 petitioners a grace period from the day they become
unemployed. The grace period can be a fixed window of, for example, 6
months, or a floating window, for example, that is proportionally to the
time they have been working in U.S.
a) From the economic perspective, such a grace period will provide
opportunities for other U.S. employers to find out that these newly-
unemployed foreign workers may have exactly the experience and skills that
these companies urgently need. Without such a grace period, if one loses
her or his job, they have to find another job IMMEDIATELY or leave this
country IMMEDIATELY.
b) From the empirical perspective, the longer a foreign worker has been
legally working in U.S., the more she or he is committed to some long-term
investments, such as owning a house or having children born here. It’s
both humane and reasonable to grant them enough time to sell their homes and
re-arrange schooling for their children. Without such a grace period, a
default or fire sale could be the natural consequences, which will worsen
the fragile housing market today.
2. Allow EB2 and EB3 petitioners to submit I-485 forms if we have been
legally working in U.S. for 5 years and/or are 180 days since our I-140
petitions have been approved.
a) In the first place, the current process unnecessarily punishes us
simply because we were born in a populous country. A similar EB2 from ROW
would have received her green card within several months. We understand the
reason to wait for the green card. But there is no reason for us to wait
to file our I-485 petitions.
b) In the second place, we are not challenging any law. We are simply
asking for an administrative convenience. The law sets a visa quota for
petitioners from each country. We respect the law and, as always, we abide
by the law. But the law does NOT forbid submitting I-485 applications.
c) In the third place, we are not even challenging the Visa Bulletin.
For EB2 and EB3 petitioners from populous countries, every month, Mr.
Charles Oppenheim in the Department of State decides the cut-off dates so
that nobody can file I-485 form if their “Priority Date” is not prior to
the cut-ff date in Visa Bulletin. We respect the Visa Bulletin, but we
believe the Visa Bulletin was established to control the issuance of green
cards, rather than to control the filing of I-485.
To summarize, we urge you to reform the current inhuman immigration
procedures by allowing a grace period and separating I-485 filing from Visa
Bulletin. Such two simple and small steps will significantly relieve us of
tremendous pressures that we face every day!
Why the white house should help us? 各位兄弟姐妹,请大家使劲想,使劲帮忙!
t*y
4 楼
【流浪歌手的情人】-怀念曾经的青葱岁月
流浪歌手的情人
我只能一再地 让你相信我
那曾经爱过你的人那就是我
在远远地离开你离开喧嚣的人群
我请你做一个流浪歌手的情人
我只能一再地 让你相信我
总是有人牵着我的手让我跟你走
在你身后人们传说中的苍凉的远方
你和你的爱情在四季传唱
我恨我不能交给爱人的生命
我恨我不能带来幸福的旋律
我只能给你一间小小的阁楼
一扇朝北的窗
让你望见星斗
找不到原版伴奏,找到的这个伴奏节奏有些慢,配乐有些midi
平安夜祝版上的xdjm平安喜悦,新的一年出更好的作品。
流浪歌手的情人
我只能一再地 让你相信我
那曾经爱过你的人那就是我
在远远地离开你离开喧嚣的人群
我请你做一个流浪歌手的情人
我只能一再地 让你相信我
总是有人牵着我的手让我跟你走
在你身后人们传说中的苍凉的远方
你和你的爱情在四季传唱
我恨我不能交给爱人的生命
我恨我不能带来幸福的旋律
我只能给你一间小小的阁楼
一扇朝北的窗
让你望见星斗
找不到原版伴奏,找到的这个伴奏节奏有些慢,配乐有些midi
平安夜祝版上的xdjm平安喜悦,新的一年出更好的作品。
e*s
5 楼
以在美华人为枪手的几起典型的凶杀案:表明了在40岁失业最容易引发枪杀!
卢刚,学生,1961,30岁
1991年11月IOWA大学
毕业找不到工作,嫉妒、迁怒同事上司。射杀来自中国的同学山林华、44岁的系主任尼
柯森等5人,女秘书重伤,
自杀
陈建,医生,不详
2000 年 6 月 西雅图华盛顿大学
被解雇。射杀美籍医院老板,
自杀
黄谷阳,教授,1964,38岁
2002年3月加州
被解雇。射杀前苏联籍老板,
自杀
刘英,工程师,1957,46岁
2003年1月加州
离婚加被解雇。射杀结婚近20年,44岁的前夫杨斌,
自杀
吴京华,工程师,1961,47岁
2008年11月加州
被解雇。射杀印度籍老板等3人,
自首
王立山,医生,1966,44岁
2010年4月,康州
被解雇。射杀印度籍老板等1人,
被捕
陈清,工程师,不详,37岁
2016年3月
印第安纳州康明斯发电机制造厂(Cummins),射杀49岁上司爱德华(Ward R. Edwards
),
饮弹自杀
汪勋力,工程师,不详,不详,
2016年4月13日,因家庭纠纷枪杀自中国来美探亲岳父母,
被捕
晁恒军,医生(研究员),1966,50岁
2016 年8月, 西奈山伊坎医学院(Icahn School of Medicine)
被解雇。枪击医院前老板校长等2人(无生命危险)
被捕
卢刚,学生,1961,30岁
1991年11月IOWA大学
毕业找不到工作,嫉妒、迁怒同事上司。射杀来自中国的同学山林华、44岁的系主任尼
柯森等5人,女秘书重伤,
自杀
陈建,医生,不详
2000 年 6 月 西雅图华盛顿大学
被解雇。射杀美籍医院老板,
自杀
黄谷阳,教授,1964,38岁
2002年3月加州
被解雇。射杀前苏联籍老板,
自杀
刘英,工程师,1957,46岁
2003年1月加州
离婚加被解雇。射杀结婚近20年,44岁的前夫杨斌,
自杀
吴京华,工程师,1961,47岁
2008年11月加州
被解雇。射杀印度籍老板等3人,
自首
王立山,医生,1966,44岁
2010年4月,康州
被解雇。射杀印度籍老板等1人,
被捕
陈清,工程师,不详,37岁
2016年3月
印第安纳州康明斯发电机制造厂(Cummins),射杀49岁上司爱德华(Ward R. Edwards
),
饮弹自杀
汪勋力,工程师,不详,不详,
2016年4月13日,因家庭纠纷枪杀自中国来美探亲岳父母,
被捕
晁恒军,医生(研究员),1966,50岁
2016 年8月, 西奈山伊坎医学院(Icahn School of Medicine)
被解雇。枪击医院前老板校长等2人(无生命危险)
被捕
c*n
7 楼
我是h1b办过两次去英国的旅游签证 英国这边也要递交很多材料 但是不用面签
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_503d02f401017n91.html
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_503d02f401017n91.html
s*r
8 楼
we are employment-based immigration petitioners in USA. We have the
following request...
1.
2.
3.
Talk our contributions.
This is not a poem, novel, or whatever. Use plain and easy English.
following request...
1.
2.
3.
Talk our contributions.
This is not a poem, novel, or whatever. Use plain and easy English.
z*o
9 楼
恩,圣诞快乐
h*c
10 楼
如果对科研是真爱,在家里也可以搞。
a*d
11 楼
自然母乳状况下,两岁,
mine, 25 months apart, both boys,
now, 4 and 6, great playmates, best friends
mine, 25 months apart, both boys,
now, 4 and 6, great playmates, best friends
w*r
12 楼
the most
regulated group of human beings?
我建议你不要以太情绪化的方式写这个信,还是客观事实点比较好,美国的正式文件还是很讲求严谨
的,你的文章中夸张和主观性的东西比较明显。
我给律师写过材料,干过下手,亲自写的发表的文章和报告很多,当然这对于一个美国人来说也都是很
普通的工作经历。但是我想好心地说一句,这么写真的不行。你的风格更像中国人写议论文,排比加夸
张的句子。美国人写这些东西就好比写科技文章,更追求证据充足和逻辑严谨,而并不强调文采。楼上
的那位朋友说的没错。
你只要有一句话明显非事实,人家会一笑了之,对你所说的东西不予严肃考虑。
regulated group of human beings?
我建议你不要以太情绪化的方式写这个信,还是客观事实点比较好,美国的正式文件还是很讲求严谨
的,你的文章中夸张和主观性的东西比较明显。
我给律师写过材料,干过下手,亲自写的发表的文章和报告很多,当然这对于一个美国人来说也都是很
普通的工作经历。但是我想好心地说一句,这么写真的不行。你的风格更像中国人写议论文,排比加夸
张的句子。美国人写这些东西就好比写科技文章,更追求证据充足和逻辑严谨,而并不强调文采。楼上
的那位朋友说的没错。
你只要有一句话明显非事实,人家会一笑了之,对你所说的东西不予严肃考虑。
h*n
14 楼
认识一个人,老大还在母乳,当时是一岁多,p一直没有来过,然后,有一天发现自己
肚子大起来了,有unprotected intercourse~ 就确定自己怀孕了~~期间没有看过医生
然后还要带老大,老大经常要她抱~~
出过两次spotting,没看医生~~~
一直很佩服这种情况,如果是我自己绝对handel不了的~~会崩溃~~
肚子大起来了,有unprotected intercourse~ 就确定自己怀孕了~~期间没有看过医生
然后还要带老大,老大经常要她抱~~
出过两次spotting,没看医生~~~
一直很佩服这种情况,如果是我自己绝对handel不了的~~会崩溃~~
M*t
15 楼
very good writing.
but Please re-think,
as you asked, why should the white house help us, esp., at the current
economic situation.
we are not asking for the mercy from the us gov.,they would not consider at
this time. they might consider if it were the IT booming days, or if the 3rd
tech renovation era is here ...,but not now.
those
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: Petition Letter:
: Subject: Reform Administrative Procedures for Employment-based Immigration
: Process
: Dear Mr. President,
: We are people who have experience and skills that are complementary to those
: of Americans. We are people who spend our best years helping American
: companies become more globally competitive. We are people who come from
: thousands of miles away to legally pursue our American dreams.
: We abide by all U.S. laws and regulations, only to find ourselves one of the most
: regulated group of human beings. By immigration laws, we are employment-
but Please re-think,
as you asked, why should the white house help us, esp., at the current
economic situation.
we are not asking for the mercy from the us gov.,they would not consider at
this time. they might consider if it were the IT booming days, or if the 3rd
tech renovation era is here ...,but not now.
those
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: Petition Letter:
: Subject: Reform Administrative Procedures for Employment-based Immigration
: Process
: Dear Mr. President,
: We are people who have experience and skills that are complementary to those
: of Americans. We are people who spend our best years helping American
: companies become more globally competitive. We are people who come from
: thousands of miles away to legally pursue our American dreams.
: We abide by all U.S. laws and regulations, only to find ourselves one of the most
: regulated group of human beings. By immigration laws, we are employment-
H*i
18 楼
should be "one of", already added
你的文章中夸张和主观性的东西比较明显。please point it out so that I can work
on them one by one.
还是很讲求严谨
国人来说也都是很
议论文,排比加夸
不强调文采。楼上
【在 w*******r 的大作中提到】
: the most
: regulated group of human beings?
: 我建议你不要以太情绪化的方式写这个信,还是客观事实点比较好,美国的正式文件还是很讲求严谨
: 的,你的文章中夸张和主观性的东西比较明显。
: 我给律师写过材料,干过下手,亲自写的发表的文章和报告很多,当然这对于一个美国人来说也都是很
: 普通的工作经历。但是我想好心地说一句,这么写真的不行。你的风格更像中国人写议论文,排比加夸
: 张的句子。美国人写这些东西就好比写科技文章,更追求证据充足和逻辑严谨,而并不强调文采。楼上
: 的那位朋友说的没错。
: 你只要有一句话明显非事实,人家会一笑了之,对你所说的东西不予严肃考虑。
你的文章中夸张和主观性的东西比较明显。please point it out so that I can work
on them one by one.
还是很讲求严谨
国人来说也都是很
议论文,排比加夸
不强调文采。楼上
【在 w*******r 的大作中提到】
: the most
: regulated group of human beings?
: 我建议你不要以太情绪化的方式写这个信,还是客观事实点比较好,美国的正式文件还是很讲求严谨
: 的,你的文章中夸张和主观性的东西比较明显。
: 我给律师写过材料,干过下手,亲自写的发表的文章和报告很多,当然这对于一个美国人来说也都是很
: 普通的工作经历。但是我想好心地说一句,这么写真的不行。你的风格更像中国人写议论文,排比加夸
: 张的句子。美国人写这些东西就好比写科技文章,更追求证据充足和逻辑严谨,而并不强调文采。楼上
: 的那位朋友说的没错。
: 你只要有一句话明显非事实,人家会一笑了之,对你所说的东西不予严肃考虑。
s*h
20 楼
老大6个月怀上算啥呀。
还有无数的irish twins呢。
我两舅舅出生也就差不到12个月。小些的后来身体还要好些,号称年轻时跑过100米手
记时11秒
还有无数的irish twins呢。
我两舅舅出生也就差不到12个月。小些的后来身体还要好些,号称年轻时跑过100米手
记时11秒
q*x
21 楼
because we are helping the economy.
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: very good writing.
: but Please re-think,
: as you asked, why should the white house help us, esp., at the current
: economic situation.
: we are not asking for the mercy from the us gov.,they would not consider at
: this time. they might consider if it were the IT booming days, or if the 3rd
: tech renovation era is here ...,but not now.
:
: those
【在 M*******t 的大作中提到】
: very good writing.
: but Please re-think,
: as you asked, why should the white house help us, esp., at the current
: economic situation.
: we are not asking for the mercy from the us gov.,they would not consider at
: this time. they might consider if it were the IT booming days, or if the 3rd
: tech renovation era is here ...,but not now.
:
: those
I*8
27 楼
LZ's idea is very good, submit 485 first then issue green card.
Maybe we need brainstorm a little bit on how to compose it.
we need figure out what we have? what make us different and unique?
( we are a group of people who have advanced degree, we have skill and
knowledge, we are experienced or skilled works)
what we can offer? Can our skills help stimulating US economy? help
increasing US jobs? Help getting more advanced degree personnel or skilled
workers join into this country's future?
what is our goal?
what will make white house think it is something important?
(President Obama advocate "changes", we saw a lot of exciting changes, such
as health care reform etc. He is now working on immigration reform and we
think that is something white house may help changing it.
I am strongly believe big changes consist of a lot of small changes, It is
small change to you but it is huge changes for us and fellow immigrants.
Multiple small changes makes big change possible.)
可以列举几个移民过来的成功人士的故事,以说明当初如果没有好的移民政策哪来今天
这些美国的优秀企业?
虽然,移民局法律有移民人口比例要维持,但出生国的人口众多,并不能说明我们不是
有用之才。相反这个比例要相应增加,现在美国在危机时刻,今天的“纳贤”才能为明
天的繁荣打下基础(就这么个意思,英语写作好的同学能否翻成优美些的句子,能写得
不卑不亢那是最好的)
requested!
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: details please! thank you.
: please contribute why the White House should make the change as we requested!
Maybe we need brainstorm a little bit on how to compose it.
we need figure out what we have? what make us different and unique?
( we are a group of people who have advanced degree, we have skill and
knowledge, we are experienced or skilled works)
what we can offer? Can our skills help stimulating US economy? help
increasing US jobs? Help getting more advanced degree personnel or skilled
workers join into this country's future?
what is our goal?
what will make white house think it is something important?
(President Obama advocate "changes", we saw a lot of exciting changes, such
as health care reform etc. He is now working on immigration reform and we
think that is something white house may help changing it.
I am strongly believe big changes consist of a lot of small changes, It is
small change to you but it is huge changes for us and fellow immigrants.
Multiple small changes makes big change possible.)
可以列举几个移民过来的成功人士的故事,以说明当初如果没有好的移民政策哪来今天
这些美国的优秀企业?
虽然,移民局法律有移民人口比例要维持,但出生国的人口众多,并不能说明我们不是
有用之才。相反这个比例要相应增加,现在美国在危机时刻,今天的“纳贤”才能为明
天的繁荣打下基础(就这么个意思,英语写作好的同学能否翻成优美些的句子,能写得
不卑不亢那是最好的)
requested!
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: details please! thank you.
: please contribute why the White House should make the change as we requested!
s*e
28 楼
非常喜欢的一首歌。赞楼主,唱得很好听啊。
w*s
30 楼
谢谢你给我们指导。我们是摸着石头过河,谁也没干过这个。LZ放弃长周末给大家处了
两个稿件。您有这方面的专业培训。可否多给些意见?给些具体些的意见吧。这样LZ才好下手呀?
还是很讲求严谨
国人来说也都是很
议论文,排比加夸
不强调文采。楼上
【在 w*******r 的大作中提到】
: the most
: regulated group of human beings?
: 我建议你不要以太情绪化的方式写这个信,还是客观事实点比较好,美国的正式文件还是很讲求严谨
: 的,你的文章中夸张和主观性的东西比较明显。
: 我给律师写过材料,干过下手,亲自写的发表的文章和报告很多,当然这对于一个美国人来说也都是很
: 普通的工作经历。但是我想好心地说一句,这么写真的不行。你的风格更像中国人写议论文,排比加夸
: 张的句子。美国人写这些东西就好比写科技文章,更追求证据充足和逻辑严谨,而并不强调文采。楼上
: 的那位朋友说的没错。
: 你只要有一句话明显非事实,人家会一笑了之,对你所说的东西不予严肃考虑。
两个稿件。您有这方面的专业培训。可否多给些意见?给些具体些的意见吧。这样LZ才好下手呀?
还是很讲求严谨
国人来说也都是很
议论文,排比加夸
不强调文采。楼上
【在 w*******r 的大作中提到】
: the most
: regulated group of human beings?
: 我建议你不要以太情绪化的方式写这个信,还是客观事实点比较好,美国的正式文件还是很讲求严谨
: 的,你的文章中夸张和主观性的东西比较明显。
: 我给律师写过材料,干过下手,亲自写的发表的文章和报告很多,当然这对于一个美国人来说也都是很
: 普通的工作经历。但是我想好心地说一句,这么写真的不行。你的风格更像中国人写议论文,排比加夸
: 张的句子。美国人写这些东西就好比写科技文章,更追求证据充足和逻辑严谨,而并不强调文采。楼上
: 的那位朋友说的没错。
: 你只要有一句话明显非事实,人家会一笑了之,对你所说的东西不予严肃考虑。
b*a
31 楼
很喜欢lz的嗓音,有厚度,很沧桑啊
好有味道,赞!
好有味道,赞!
a*v
33 楼
First of all, great work guys! Very good writing.Thanks!
I am glad you took out the "dog" part. We have our dignity and no one can
take it away from us.
We might also want to show some "teeth" in the letter, not just "asking for
mercy". Meaning, by doing the suggestions we made, they are doing themselves
a favor too, just just for us. It is a win-win situation.
The consequence of current immigration practice will results in some of
brightest (most have US advanced degrees) leaving or considering leaving.
Granted, there will be always be a huge pool of Eb2/Eb3 waiting to get their
immigration approved. BUT, the quality will not remain the same.
I am glad you took out the "dog" part. We have our dignity and no one can
take it away from us.
We might also want to show some "teeth" in the letter, not just "asking for
mercy". Meaning, by doing the suggestions we made, they are doing themselves
a favor too, just just for us. It is a win-win situation.
The consequence of current immigration practice will results in some of
brightest (most have US advanced degrees) leaving or considering leaving.
Granted, there will be always be a huge pool of Eb2/Eb3 waiting to get their
immigration approved. BUT, the quality will not remain the same.
a*u
34 楼
呵呵,给你做了一个,不知道会不会好点儿?
下载链接:
http://www.box.com/s/ex4oszo1898tddmycq52
【在 t******y 的大作中提到】
: 味精兄,能不能帮忙给伴奏加点味精
下载链接:
http://www.box.com/s/ex4oszo1898tddmycq52
【在 t******y 的大作中提到】
: 味精兄,能不能帮忙给伴奏加点味精
H*i
36 楼
我非常想show some teeth, 真得很想。
但是我不想让白宫幕僚向USCIS和外交部问责的时候,回答是:这些人是EB23,我们对于
创业者已经有了八月二号的新政,我们对于顶尖人才用EB1和EB2 NIW渠道处理。他们企
图把自己打扮成EB1和EB2 NIW来威胁我们,不要上他们的当。
for
themselves
their
【在 a**v 的大作中提到】
: First of all, great work guys! Very good writing.Thanks!
: I am glad you took out the "dog" part. We have our dignity and no one can
: take it away from us.
: We might also want to show some "teeth" in the letter, not just "asking for
: mercy". Meaning, by doing the suggestions we made, they are doing themselves
: a favor too, just just for us. It is a win-win situation.
: The consequence of current immigration practice will results in some of
: brightest (most have US advanced degrees) leaving or considering leaving.
: Granted, there will be always be a huge pool of Eb2/Eb3 waiting to get their
: immigration approved. BUT, the quality will not remain the same.
但是我不想让白宫幕僚向USCIS和外交部问责的时候,回答是:这些人是EB23,我们对于
创业者已经有了八月二号的新政,我们对于顶尖人才用EB1和EB2 NIW渠道处理。他们企
图把自己打扮成EB1和EB2 NIW来威胁我们,不要上他们的当。
for
themselves
their
【在 a**v 的大作中提到】
: First of all, great work guys! Very good writing.Thanks!
: I am glad you took out the "dog" part. We have our dignity and no one can
: take it away from us.
: We might also want to show some "teeth" in the letter, not just "asking for
: mercy". Meaning, by doing the suggestions we made, they are doing themselves
: a favor too, just just for us. It is a win-win situation.
: The consequence of current immigration practice will results in some of
: brightest (most have US advanced degrees) leaving or considering leaving.
: Granted, there will be always be a huge pool of Eb2/Eb3 waiting to get their
: immigration approved. BUT, the quality will not remain the same.
l*y
39 楼
刚看了开头1,2段。就觉得上来应该先明确报一下此信代表谁,而不是一段排比。这段
排比可以放在后面。我的0.01 cent.
我继续看。
排比可以放在后面。我的0.01 cent.
我继续看。
c*g
40 楼
唱得很不错,有沧桑的感觉
s*x
41 楼
我有个邻居两个孩子差11个月,小的都2岁了,两个孩子看上去都很结实。妈妈对我说
她觉得刚刚恢复过来。
我还有个同学,他弟弟比他小不到12个月。两个人身体一般,但都很优秀,一个清华一
个北大。不过少年丧母。
结论就很显然了。
她觉得刚刚恢复过来。
我还有个同学,他弟弟比他小不到12个月。两个人身体一般,但都很优秀,一个清华一
个北大。不过少年丧母。
结论就很显然了。
l*y
42 楼
再有个问题,140批了之后就可以交EAD/AP的话对我们petitioner和uscis对整个绿卡申
请过程的管理是不是更合理?
请过程的管理是不是更合理?
g*x
43 楼
嗓音很有感觉。
l*y
45 楼
总觉得一下放开485提交时间是很大一步,很难遭到同意。
s*x
47 楼
孕育哺育一个孩子对母亲的身体消耗是很大的
在没有完全恢复的情况下再生一个影响就更大了
在没有完全恢复的情况下再生一个影响就更大了
l*y
48 楼
上哪弄些真实数据呢。。。
H*r
49 楼
赞巴多!好空灵,正符合老夫狂野不拘的需要!下载了,谢谢
【在 a*******u 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵,给你做了一个,不知道会不会好点儿?
: 下载链接:
: http://www.box.com/s/ex4oszo1898tddmycq52
【在 a*******u 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵,给你做了一个,不知道会不会好点儿?
: 下载链接:
: http://www.box.com/s/ex4oszo1898tddmycq52
a*c
50 楼
计划赶不上变化,摊上了也只能生啊。
l*y
51 楼
丢了工作grace period短那个request,感觉如果是很少一部分人无奈因此离开美国,
此要求不会给予考虑的。谁给指条路哪里弄到数据支持一下。
此要求不会给予考虑的。谁给指条路哪里弄到数据支持一下。
l*y
54 楼
request 2更靠谱。因为大量petitioner被这个485 filing束缚手脚。but again,no
real data。
最起码能让人有更多自由工作是底线。其实我觉得相关的应该有规定 -- 比如在同一
领域升迁并且工资相应长到规定的数字是应该被允许的;再比如工作类别之间可以小范
围呼唤;还有petitioner只要从priority date为同一雇主工作超过一定年数(比如3-
4年)而且140批了,就可以换雇主;140批了至少就可以申请EAD和AP而不是必须等交了
485才行。
real data。
最起码能让人有更多自由工作是底线。其实我觉得相关的应该有规定 -- 比如在同一
领域升迁并且工资相应长到规定的数字是应该被允许的;再比如工作类别之间可以小范
围呼唤;还有petitioner只要从priority date为同一雇主工作超过一定年数(比如3-
4年)而且140批了,就可以换雇主;140批了至少就可以申请EAD和AP而不是必须等交了
485才行。
t*y
55 楼
这两天家里太忙,没来得及空上来感谢味精兄弟,改天我用你的伴奏试试。
【在 a*******u 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵,给你做了一个,不知道会不会好点儿?
: 下载链接:
: http://www.box.com/s/ex4oszo1898tddmycq52
【在 a*******u 的大作中提到】
: 呵呵,给你做了一个,不知道会不会好点儿?
: 下载链接:
: http://www.box.com/s/ex4oszo1898tddmycq52
t*1
56 楼
我知道的姐姐弟弟差11个月, 现在姐姐47, 弟弟46, 妈妈71。
l*y
57 楼
其实,最根本的原因是美国本身就是移民国家。没有移民就没有美国。象我们老中申请
eb2/3的大多是有这一份不错的工作,兢兢业业为公司(间接为美国)努力工作的。美
国是自由民主的国家,我们理解gc是美国政府赋予的privilege。可是我们一直是在努
力争取着自己的自由民主的生活。能让如此多的技术准移民在自己的技术领域更自由的
发展贡献比现在受巨大限制更附和美帝利益。咔咔。
eb2/3的大多是有这一份不错的工作,兢兢业业为公司(间接为美国)努力工作的。美
国是自由民主的国家,我们理解gc是美国政府赋予的privilege。可是我们一直是在努
力争取着自己的自由民主的生活。能让如此多的技术准移民在自己的技术领域更自由的
发展贡献比现在受巨大限制更附和美帝利益。咔咔。
t*5
58 楼
这首唱得也很不错啊,呵呵。同一种风格的歌后期可以照搬,比如这一首还行,如果完
全是另一种风格还是要做些适当调整的。
全是另一种风格还是要做些适当调整的。
a*l
59 楼
也有原因是跟sibling rivalry 有关的
有本书上推荐差 3岁以上,说看到孩子年龄差得少的妈妈在小的会爬以后会遇到更大的
困难
有本书上推荐差 3岁以上,说看到孩子年龄差得少的妈妈在小的会爬以后会遇到更大的
困难
l*y
60 楼
我胡说完毕。lz辛苦写信。大家长周末继续愉快。
a*v
63 楼
They will always find excuses. The point is what they gain by doing that.
There is no free lunch. If they don't risk of anything with rejecting the
request; then why would they accept this.
Most EB1s are in Academic, while most EB2/3 in industry; they are not
comparable. There is no point to argue which category contributes more to
the economy/society.
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: 我非常想show some teeth, 真得很想。
: 但是我不想让白宫幕僚向USCIS和外交部问责的时候,回答是:这些人是EB23,我们对于
: 创业者已经有了八月二号的新政,我们对于顶尖人才用EB1和EB2 NIW渠道处理。他们企
: 图把自己打扮成EB1和EB2 NIW来威胁我们,不要上他们的当。
:
: for
: themselves
: their
There is no free lunch. If they don't risk of anything with rejecting the
request; then why would they accept this.
Most EB1s are in Academic, while most EB2/3 in industry; they are not
comparable. There is no point to argue which category contributes more to
the economy/society.
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: 我非常想show some teeth, 真得很想。
: 但是我不想让白宫幕僚向USCIS和外交部问责的时候,回答是:这些人是EB23,我们对于
: 创业者已经有了八月二号的新政,我们对于顶尖人才用EB1和EB2 NIW渠道处理。他们企
: 图把自己打扮成EB1和EB2 NIW来威胁我们,不要上他们的当。
:
: for
: themselves
: their
w*g
68 楼
我对政治不很懂,但我觉得最不该提的可能就是经济。
目前我们的诉求所影响的基本只有中印EB2和包括中国印在内的一些国家的EB3,这些人
对于整个美国的经济来说,几乎是微不足道的一股力量。他们的工资相对于平均水平并
不低,但其实也并不高,他们的购买力和购买习惯根本不足以对美国经济有任何影响。
如果一味强调移民带来的经济利益的话,政府应该以更开放的政策鼓励投资移民,而不
是工作移民。
政府完全可以不理会我们的要求,因为那也不会成为政府的失误。
所以,我反而以为,我们应该着力向政府询问为什么剩余名额要按PD分。如果说法律确
实规定了剩余名额按PD分,那为什么法律同时规定7%的平均原则。为什么中国申请者是
两种截然不同的分配原则共同施下的唯一受害者。
政府必须认真回答我们的这个问题,因为这涉及到法律的公平和公正性问题。(当然,
美国的政法是分开的,但我们不需要过多顾及这个)
创业者,否则白宫幕僚向USCIS和外交部问责的时候,回答将会是:这些人是EB23,我们
对于创业者已经有了八月二号的新政,我们对于顶尖人才用EB1和EB2 NIW渠道处理。他
们企图把自己打扮成EB1和E
those
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: 即使你能够交485,但是一转眼你被裁员了,马上就必须离开美国,那么交了485有什么
: 用呢?
目前我们的诉求所影响的基本只有中印EB2和包括中国印在内的一些国家的EB3,这些人
对于整个美国的经济来说,几乎是微不足道的一股力量。他们的工资相对于平均水平并
不低,但其实也并不高,他们的购买力和购买习惯根本不足以对美国经济有任何影响。
如果一味强调移民带来的经济利益的话,政府应该以更开放的政策鼓励投资移民,而不
是工作移民。
政府完全可以不理会我们的要求,因为那也不会成为政府的失误。
所以,我反而以为,我们应该着力向政府询问为什么剩余名额要按PD分。如果说法律确
实规定了剩余名额按PD分,那为什么法律同时规定7%的平均原则。为什么中国申请者是
两种截然不同的分配原则共同施下的唯一受害者。
政府必须认真回答我们的这个问题,因为这涉及到法律的公平和公正性问题。(当然,
美国的政法是分开的,但我们不需要过多顾及这个)
创业者,否则白宫幕僚向USCIS和外交部问责的时候,回答将会是:这些人是EB23,我们
对于创业者已经有了八月二号的新政,我们对于顶尖人才用EB1和EB2 NIW渠道处理。他
们企图把自己打扮成EB1和E
those
【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: 即使你能够交485,但是一转眼你被裁员了,马上就必须离开美国,那么交了485有什么
: 用呢?
l*o
71 楼
喜欢这种沧桑的嗓音。
H*i
72 楼
您不早出来舌战群儒。我岂能没有想到这些(有老贴为证)?但是众口难调,这是政治
请愿,需要大多数人的选票。我只能尽最大力量接受意见,态度非常好地改正。大多数
人喜欢大波我就隆胸,大多数人呵斥肥婆我就吸脂。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article0/EB23/31394579_0.html
【在 w*****g 的大作中提到】
: 我对政治不很懂,但我觉得最不该提的可能就是经济。
: 目前我们的诉求所影响的基本只有中印EB2和包括中国印在内的一些国家的EB3,这些人
: 对于整个美国的经济来说,几乎是微不足道的一股力量。他们的工资相对于平均水平并
: 不低,但其实也并不高,他们的购买力和购买习惯根本不足以对美国经济有任何影响。
: 如果一味强调移民带来的经济利益的话,政府应该以更开放的政策鼓励投资移民,而不
: 是工作移民。
: 政府完全可以不理会我们的要求,因为那也不会成为政府的失误。
: 所以,我反而以为,我们应该着力向政府询问为什么剩余名额要按PD分。如果说法律确
: 实规定了剩余名额按PD分,那为什么法律同时规定7%的平均原则。为什么中国申请者是
: 两种截然不同的分配原则共同施下的唯一受害者。
请愿,需要大多数人的选票。我只能尽最大力量接受意见,态度非常好地改正。大多数
人喜欢大波我就隆胸,大多数人呵斥肥婆我就吸脂。
http://www.mitbbs.com/article0/EB23/31394579_0.html
【在 w*****g 的大作中提到】
: 我对政治不很懂,但我觉得最不该提的可能就是经济。
: 目前我们的诉求所影响的基本只有中印EB2和包括中国印在内的一些国家的EB3,这些人
: 对于整个美国的经济来说,几乎是微不足道的一股力量。他们的工资相对于平均水平并
: 不低,但其实也并不高,他们的购买力和购买习惯根本不足以对美国经济有任何影响。
: 如果一味强调移民带来的经济利益的话,政府应该以更开放的政策鼓励投资移民,而不
: 是工作移民。
: 政府完全可以不理会我们的要求,因为那也不会成为政府的失误。
: 所以,我反而以为,我们应该着力向政府询问为什么剩余名额要按PD分。如果说法律确
: 实规定了剩余名额按PD分,那为什么法律同时规定7%的平均原则。为什么中国申请者是
: 两种截然不同的分配原则共同施下的唯一受害者。
V*x
73 楼
略带沧桑的感觉。。。
让我不自觉听了好几遍~
感觉越来越好~~
让我不自觉听了好几遍~
感觉越来越好~~
w*s
74 楼
同意!这样的门槛太高。不容易被接受。
我们的要求应该明确,就一条。 提前递交485。 避免政客避重就轻,把其它的容易的
要求满足了。而避开 提前递交485。 提前递交485才是我们这次请愿的唯一目的。
另外,我有关与如何提前递交485。我们需要商榷一下:
现在我们提出的是在美国工作5年,140批准180,全地球人都可以交485。其实,这个全
地球人,只有中印。而中印申请人比例悬殊,至少1:3。 这样,是不是更加把中印捆
绑。中国分不到SO?
我们最开始讨论这个485行动的时候,我很清楚的记得JWE提出的是让PD在cut off day
半年(或是一年)的申请人递交485。这样是避免在每个财年之末,因为没有485 库存
而使得SO都让人数重多的印度人抢走。而在财年末,PD在cutoffday半年(一年)之外
的申请人,谁也不知道到底有多少,就让中,印对半分。现在的问题是,老奥说他明确
知道在cutoffday之外的中印申请人,他就死抓着中印捆绑。这是2007年大朝留给我们
中国申请人的严重问题。要是无人知道cut off day 之外具体的申请人数,我们就有充
分的理由去和国务院要求,中印平分SO.
假设我们的请愿能够得到满足,我们NIU的下一步就是要更多的为中国人争取到SO。
我们现在的请愿要求,有些大,会让中印更加捆绑。 中印捆绑是所以问题的根本。如
果现在,没有中印捆绑,还是像2007之前,中国快印度2年中国现在的cut off day就是
, 2009 、 4、 15。 如果,没有中印捆绑,我们分到去年和今年的SO,那我们中国人
的cutoffday本应是current。这样,我们中国人就不会伤成现在这样。远看未来,中印
更加捆绑,印度人更多,中国人会被拖累的没有任何喘息。 大家想想看,是不是这个
道理?
中国人现在被捆绑的主要原因之一是在07年大潮的时候,中印是哗啦啦都交了485了。
国务院奥本明确知道中印的demand是多少。他没有理由不把每年都Spill Over按照供需
要求分配,这就无法改变中印捆绑。现在07年的backlog要清空了。对07之后的确切
demand没人知道,这样我们才能要求奥本把SO平分。这样才能是中印不捆绑。这是绝好
的机会。否则,再重蹈一次07大潮,今天的人都交了485。之后呢?让现在还没有申请
绿卡,也更没有任何发言权的中国职业移民和多余自己4、5倍的印度人捆绑等待10年还
是15年?这不负责吧。
而且,我们一下要求地球人都交458,就像回答07,移民局的案例要用卡车来运。移民局
有了一次,他不会同意的。请愿门槛高,难度大,不容易被接受。让PD在cut off day
半年(或是一年)的申请人递交485。移民局能接受,我们才没有白忙活。否则,即使白宫和移民局说,
移民局也可以列举种种理由说这样不能执行。我们全白忙活了。
【在 l****y 的大作中提到】
: 总觉得一下放开485提交时间是很大一步,很难遭到同意。
我们的要求应该明确,就一条。 提前递交485。 避免政客避重就轻,把其它的容易的
要求满足了。而避开 提前递交485。 提前递交485才是我们这次请愿的唯一目的。
另外,我有关与如何提前递交485。我们需要商榷一下:
现在我们提出的是在美国工作5年,140批准180,全地球人都可以交485。其实,这个全
地球人,只有中印。而中印申请人比例悬殊,至少1:3。 这样,是不是更加把中印捆
绑。中国分不到SO?
我们最开始讨论这个485行动的时候,我很清楚的记得JWE提出的是让PD在cut off day
半年(或是一年)的申请人递交485。这样是避免在每个财年之末,因为没有485 库存
而使得SO都让人数重多的印度人抢走。而在财年末,PD在cutoffday半年(一年)之外
的申请人,谁也不知道到底有多少,就让中,印对半分。现在的问题是,老奥说他明确
知道在cutoffday之外的中印申请人,他就死抓着中印捆绑。这是2007年大朝留给我们
中国申请人的严重问题。要是无人知道cut off day 之外具体的申请人数,我们就有充
分的理由去和国务院要求,中印平分SO.
假设我们的请愿能够得到满足,我们NIU的下一步就是要更多的为中国人争取到SO。
我们现在的请愿要求,有些大,会让中印更加捆绑。 中印捆绑是所以问题的根本。如
果现在,没有中印捆绑,还是像2007之前,中国快印度2年中国现在的cut off day就是
, 2009 、 4、 15。 如果,没有中印捆绑,我们分到去年和今年的SO,那我们中国人
的cutoffday本应是current。这样,我们中国人就不会伤成现在这样。远看未来,中印
更加捆绑,印度人更多,中国人会被拖累的没有任何喘息。 大家想想看,是不是这个
道理?
中国人现在被捆绑的主要原因之一是在07年大潮的时候,中印是哗啦啦都交了485了。
国务院奥本明确知道中印的demand是多少。他没有理由不把每年都Spill Over按照供需
要求分配,这就无法改变中印捆绑。现在07年的backlog要清空了。对07之后的确切
demand没人知道,这样我们才能要求奥本把SO平分。这样才能是中印不捆绑。这是绝好
的机会。否则,再重蹈一次07大潮,今天的人都交了485。之后呢?让现在还没有申请
绿卡,也更没有任何发言权的中国职业移民和多余自己4、5倍的印度人捆绑等待10年还
是15年?这不负责吧。
而且,我们一下要求地球人都交458,就像回答07,移民局的案例要用卡车来运。移民局
有了一次,他不会同意的。请愿门槛高,难度大,不容易被接受。让PD在cut off day
半年(或是一年)的申请人递交485。移民局能接受,我们才没有白忙活。否则,即使白宫和移民局说,
移民局也可以列举种种理由说这样不能执行。我们全白忙活了。
【在 l****y 的大作中提到】
: 总觉得一下放开485提交时间是很大一步,很难遭到同意。
t*y
75 楼
谢谢lvxiao和Vieux听歌,祝2012万事如意
w*r
76 楼
最新新版本好了很多.
个人建议,应该在一开始就指出这封信的目的是什么,写信的人是谁,并用几句话总结一
下为什么你们的建议是对美国有利的.
然后用正文部分展开.
看信的人,不管是谁,必然很忙,必须在第一段就把事情基本说清楚,否则看信人很可能心
里嘀咕一句这是什么,然后考虑到是一帮没有选举权的人写的东西,不必理会,就直接扔
垃圾桶了.
个人建议,应该在一开始就指出这封信的目的是什么,写信的人是谁,并用几句话总结一
下为什么你们的建议是对美国有利的.
然后用正文部分展开.
看信的人,不管是谁,必然很忙,必须在第一段就把事情基本说清楚,否则看信人很可能心
里嘀咕一句这是什么,然后考虑到是一帮没有选举权的人写的东西,不必理会,就直接扔
垃圾桶了.
t*c
77 楼
沧桑的声音配这歌真合适,只是听的我心情直线下降。咳,叹两口气。
H*i
78 楼
开头加了一段经济影响了。有数据。
k*y
80 楼
In June 2011, the unemployment rate among the civilian labor force with
Bachelor's degree and higher was 4.4%, comparing with the national
unemployment rate of 9.2%.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
EB2&3 immigrants are the engine of the American growth. We deserve better
treatment from the government.
Bachelor's degree and higher was 4.4%, comparing with the national
unemployment rate of 9.2%.
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
EB2&3 immigrants are the engine of the American growth. We deserve better
treatment from the government.
l*e
82 楼
唱得真有味道!整个控制的很好
天天好好休息啊~~~煮些稀饭吃吧
天天好好休息啊~~~煮些稀饭吃吧
l*y
83 楼
这首歌适合你,比上次那首似乎感觉更好~~~
嗯,也祝天天早日康复:)
嗯,也祝天天早日康复:)
n*a
84 楼
音色和口气都很对路,后期做得也不错,略有几处音准可以卡到更准,蛮好的
t*y
86 楼
谢谢loveshine,littlelonely,narakavala和bur听歌,祝新年快乐
l*u
87 楼
平安夜送上流浪歌手的情人,有人笑纳否?
送的好,够味,有时间我也回味一把青葱岁月。
送的好,够味,有时间我也回味一把青葱岁月。
相关阅读
Paper HelpPaper help, Pls.这里到底有多少转行成功的例子啊Ask a favor for two papers from Biochemisty---link provided-----Thanks a bundle!请问有没有这样一种有机硅化合物ZZ:中国制裁加拿大University of Calgary (转载)Any one can help with this paper? Thanks a lot!化学训练的是忍者神龟随便找个专业读2年出来,挣钱都比化学PHD容易经典大腿如何把小分子连接到蛋白质分子上?交流一下经验吧,有人用过GRAMS AI软件处理Raman吗?文献求助-done老将-评价印度之旅俱乐部应该去哪报名亚?终于见到传说中的枫树了同学们,有了孩子还让他、她学化学吗article help大家在 gradient elution 后要多少的methanol eqaulibriate问个红外问题,1618cm-1可能是啥?