Anti-China bias in Headlines 3# CivilSociety - 华人政治
o*e
1 楼
This article in the Diplomat:
"Getting Senkaku History Right"
http://thediplomat.com/2013/11/getting-senkaku-history-right/1/
The headline looks fair right? What's wrong with trying to get the history
right?
Nothing. This article very strongly defend Japan's claim and attributed
various motivations to China. The author's name/bio is at the very end, at
the front of the article there's the name in light grey hard-to-see letters
. When you are done reading it, you realize you
are reading a Japanese official and visiting professor's mind.
Biased or not? Insideous or not? Your call. Japan is wearing layers and
layers of pretty kimonos, but he's trying again to borrow a knife to stick
his neighbor with.
the part 1, and part 2 are here:
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/CivilSociety/4743.html
"Getting Senkaku History Right"
http://thediplomat.com/2013/11/getting-senkaku-history-right/1/
The headline looks fair right? What's wrong with trying to get the history
right?
Nothing. This article very strongly defend Japan's claim and attributed
various motivations to China. The author's name/bio is at the very end, at
the front of the article there's the name in light grey hard-to-see letters
. When you are done reading it, you realize you
are reading a Japanese official and visiting professor's mind.
Biased or not? Insideous or not? Your call. Japan is wearing layers and
layers of pretty kimonos, but he's trying again to borrow a knife to stick
his neighbor with.
the part 1, and part 2 are here:
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/CivilSociety/4743.html