Re: Journal paper VS. conference paper??# CS - 计算机科学
c*t
1 楼
sure, if you had that much time. Reading != understanding.
f*r
2 楼
And understanding != you can find new/exciting things. The main problem is what is the most effecient way to get into one field/one problem. From my experience, if you want to build some background knowledge, it is better to read some jounal articles/Ph.D thesis. Then you can read some latest conference/workshop papers to know the state of the art.
【在 c****t 的大作中提到】 : sure, if you had that much time. Reading != understanding.
c*t
3 楼
sure. Einstein said there are four shapes of "researchers"; 1) triangle, this type of researchers own solid backgound and very acute sense of creativity. Newton, Einstein, Gauss are among this category. For them, Reading --> Understanding --> creating something new. 2) diamand, weak background but very acute creativity. Creating things without much reading.
3) trapezia, solid background, but not very smart, Reading --> Understanding --> sometimes create something. But
【在 f*****r 的大作中提到】 : : And understanding != you can find new/exciting things. : The main problem is what is the most effecient way to get into one field/one : problem. From my experience, if you want to build some background knowledge, : it is better to read some jounal articles/Ph.D thesis. Then you can read some : latest conference/workshop papers to know the state of the art.
r*n
4 楼
exactly, conf. papers just make u catching the cutting edge. that's all.
【在 f*****r 的大作中提到】 : : And understanding != you can find new/exciting things. : The main problem is what is the most effecient way to get into one field/one : problem. From my experience, if you want to build some background knowledge, : it is better to read some jounal articles/Ph.D thesis. Then you can read some : latest conference/workshop papers to know the state of the art.