LAPACK++ or TNT? - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>CS - 计算机科学

LAPACK++ or TNT?

LAPACK++ or TNT?# CS - 计算机科学

mw2005-09-13 07:09

1 楼

Hi,
the GSL from GNU is implemented in standart C , and looks ugly in a OO
designed program.
LAPACK++ seems to be much better, but its webpage said it has been replaced
with TNT, i go to the webpage of TNT and found it's actually not well
maintained (seems to be)
so, what kind of toolkit are u now using ? or you guys just write them by
yourself?
thanks

w*a2005-09-13 07:09

2 楼

Current TNT package is really weak. Don't believe it, though I'm
using it as a basis.

【在 mw 的大作中提到】

: Hi,
: the GSL from GNU is implemented in standart C , and looks ugly in a OO
: designed program.
: LAPACK++ seems to be much better, but its webpage said it has been replaced
: with TNT, i go to the webpage of TNT and found it's actually not well
: maintained (seems to be)
: so, what kind of toolkit are u now using ? or you guys just write them by
: yourself?
: thanks

t*g2005-09-13 07:09

3 楼

both lapack++ and TNT are week.
with them, you'd better prepare to call the lapack directly sometime.
there is a nice c++ package called SYNAPS by B. Mourrain et al.
worth trying: http://www-sop.inria.fr/galaad/logiciels/synaps/.
but it is still under developing.

【在 mw 的大作中提到】

mw2005-09-13 07:09

4 楼

i finally chose TNT
lapack is too complicated for me , especially when I need to program on
WIndows.
TNT is really not so powerful, i need to write quite a lot of code myself to
turn it into something i want.
anyway, it's quite handy.
oh, thanks for your suggestion! :)

【在 t**g 的大作中提到】

: both lapack++ and TNT are week.
: with them, you'd better prepare to call the lapack directly sometime.
: there is a nice c++ package called SYNAPS by B. Mourrain et al.
: worth trying: http://www-sop.inria.fr/galaad/logiciels/synaps/.
: but it is still under developing.