Access History - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Database - 数据库

Access History

Access History# Database - 数据库

t*e2005-08-08 07:08

1 楼

I will have an interview 3 days later, part of DB are on Access.
To me Access is really small,easy DB, comapre with Oracle.
use them sometimes, but not sure the history about Access:
1.when was the first version of Access coming to alive?
2. what is the earliest version?
Access 97, 2000, 2003 are very popular current version, everyonw knows that.
It will be nice to give some impressions if I know about Access History better
.
I think Microsoft came out in year 1991, don't remmeber during that ti

a*t2005-08-08 07:08

2 楼

I highly doubt they'll ask you about the history of MS Access.
probably forms, reports, publishing to the web etc questions are more likely.

better

【在 t****e 的大作中提到】

: I will have an interview 3 days later, part of DB are on Access.
: To me Access is really small,easy DB, comapre with Oracle.
: use them sometimes, but not sure the history about Access:
: 1.when was the first version of Access coming to alive?
: 2. what is the earliest version?
: Access 97, 2000, 2003 are very popular current version, everyonw knows that.
: It will be nice to give some impressions if I know about Access History better
: .
: I think Microsoft came out in year 1991, don't remmeber during that ti

t*e2005-08-08 07:08

3 楼

That is what I mean, It will be nice if I can speak out all those Access
generations, which prove you are proficient about those.
They don't really care about those Access forms, reports ... etc. since the
main DB is still on Oracle. I am consident about my Oracle and PLSQL, don't
think too much problem about Access,(they have their standar Java interface
and Crystal Report Server).
But what can I say about those Access? I can't just say too easy ....
I am curious by myself also, how old is this

【在 a*******t 的大作中提到】

: I highly doubt they'll ask you about the history of MS Access.
: probably forms, reports, publishing to the web etc questions are more likely.
:
: better

x*o2005-08-08 07:08

4 楼

I just google out. For your reference.
Access 1.0
Access 1.1
Access 2.x (Office 4.x)
Access 95 (Office 95)
Access 97 (Office 97)
Access 2000 (Office 2000)
Access 2002 (Office XP)
http://databases.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=databases&zu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emsps.com%2Foldtools%2Fmsaccv.htm

【在 t****e 的大作中提到】

: That is what I mean, It will be nice if I can speak out all those Access
: generations, which prove you are proficient about those.
: They don't really care about those Access forms, reports ... etc. since the
: main DB is still on Oracle. I am consident about my Oracle and PLSQL, don't
: think too much problem about Access,(they have their standar Java interface
: and Crystal Report Server).
: But what can I say about those Access? I can't just say too easy ....
: I am curious by myself also, how old is this

a*t2005-08-08 07:08

5 楼

add latest version: 2003

【在 x*****o 的大作中提到】

: I just google out. For your reference.
: Access 1.0
: Access 1.1
: Access 2.x (Office 4.x)
: Access 95 (Office 95)
: Access 97 (Office 97)
: Access 2000 (Office 2000)
: Access 2002 (Office XP)
: http://databases.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm?zi=1/XJ&sdn=databases&zu=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.emsps.com%2Foldtools%2Fmsaccv.htm

t*e2005-08-08 07:08

6 楼

Thanks bunch! that helps.
Anyone

【在 a*******t 的大作中提到】

: add latest version: 2003