m*a
2 楼
到M$来吧。把简历给我。考试就免费了
m*********[email protected]
【在 k****i 的大作中提到】
: 又发信骚扰说从MCSD.NET升级到MCPD: Enterprise Applications Developer只
: 要考两门.
m*********[email protected]
【在 k****i 的大作中提到】
: 又发信骚扰说从MCSD.NET升级到MCPD: Enterprise Applications Developer只
: 要考两门.
k*i
3 楼
Wow, you should get high score in those company promoting columns during the
year-end review! Hope next time I can tell people I just save some bucks by
switching to M$. :)
Right, I won't upgrade it unless the company will reimburse it. Also, for me
.net 2.0 is more like a transition version which is supposed to be replaced
by a more feature-attractive 3.0 version soon(hopefully).
【在 m*****a 的大作中提到】
: 到M$来吧。把简历给我。考试就免费了
: m*********[email protected]
year-end review! Hope next time I can tell people I just save some bucks by
switching to M$. :)
Right, I won't upgrade it unless the company will reimburse it. Also, for me
.net 2.0 is more like a transition version which is supposed to be replaced
by a more feature-attractive 3.0 version soon(hopefully).
【在 m*****a 的大作中提到】
: 到M$来吧。把简历给我。考试就免费了
: m*********[email protected]
r*y
4 楼
2.0 is much better than 1.1, but still not matured. Say, matrix
operation is slow; multimedia support is poor; not cross-platforms.
the
by
me
replaced
【在 k****i 的大作中提到】
: Wow, you should get high score in those company promoting columns during the
: year-end review! Hope next time I can tell people I just save some bucks by
: switching to M$. :)
: Right, I won't upgrade it unless the company will reimburse it. Also, for me
: .net 2.0 is more like a transition version which is supposed to be replaced
: by a more feature-attractive 3.0 version soon(hopefully).
operation is slow; multimedia support is poor; not cross-platforms.
the
by
me
replaced
【在 k****i 的大作中提到】
: Wow, you should get high score in those company promoting columns during the
: year-end review! Hope next time I can tell people I just save some bucks by
: switching to M$. :)
: Right, I won't upgrade it unless the company will reimburse it. Also, for me
: .net 2.0 is more like a transition version which is supposed to be replaced
: by a more feature-attractive 3.0 version soon(hopefully).
f*e
5 楼
I don't like the "var" variable in 3.0
the
by
me
replaced
【在 k****i 的大作中提到】
: Wow, you should get high score in those company promoting columns during the
: year-end review! Hope next time I can tell people I just save some bucks by
: switching to M$. :)
: Right, I won't upgrade it unless the company will reimburse it. Also, for me
: .net 2.0 is more like a transition version which is supposed to be replaced
: by a more feature-attractive 3.0 version soon(hopefully).
the
by
me
replaced
【在 k****i 的大作中提到】
: Wow, you should get high score in those company promoting columns during the
: year-end review! Hope next time I can tell people I just save some bucks by
: switching to M$. :)
: Right, I won't upgrade it unless the company will reimburse it. Also, for me
: .net 2.0 is more like a transition version which is supposed to be replaced
: by a more feature-attractive 3.0 version soon(hopefully).
k*i
9 楼
You must be misunderstood what 'var' really means in C# 3.0 as I was when I
first heard about it. It's not the one that we are familiar with in
javascript and there is a strong reason to introduce it into c# 3.0.
'var' is just a shortcut for variable declaration: we don't have to type all
the words for the variable type on the left hand side, the compiler will
INFER the type of the variable from the right hand side. If you look at the
IL, the variable is still strong typed, which means you can't
【在 f*****e 的大作中提到】
: to satisfy those stupid vb programers
first heard about it. It's not the one that we are familiar with in
javascript and there is a strong reason to introduce it into c# 3.0.
'var' is just a shortcut for variable declaration: we don't have to type all
the words for the variable type on the left hand side, the compiler will
INFER the type of the variable from the right hand side. If you look at the
IL, the variable is still strong typed, which means you can't
【在 f*****e 的大作中提到】
: to satisfy those stupid vb programers
r*y
10 楼
Good explanation for self-completness.
If so, why not simply declare it as 'Object' instead of 'var'?
I
all
the
another
【在 k****i 的大作中提到】
: You must be misunderstood what 'var' really means in C# 3.0 as I was when I
: first heard about it. It's not the one that we are familiar with in
: javascript and there is a strong reason to introduce it into c# 3.0.
: 'var' is just a shortcut for variable declaration: we don't have to type all
: the words for the variable type on the left hand side, the compiler will
: INFER the type of the variable from the right hand side. If you look at the
: IL, the variable is still strong typed, which means you can't
If so, why not simply declare it as 'Object' instead of 'var'?
I
all
the
another
【在 k****i 的大作中提到】
: You must be misunderstood what 'var' really means in C# 3.0 as I was when I
: first heard about it. It's not the one that we are familiar with in
: javascript and there is a strong reason to introduce it into c# 3.0.
: 'var' is just a shortcut for variable declaration: we don't have to type all
: the words for the variable type on the left hand side, the compiler will
: INFER the type of the variable from the right hand side. If you look at the
: IL, the variable is still strong typed, which means you can't
k*i
11 楼
Don't forget 'var' is just a declaration shortcut. The same question would
be 'Why not just declare it as 'Object' instead of 'int/double,...''?
And you can read more about anonymous method in c# 3.0 if interested.
【在 r****y 的大作中提到】
: Good explanation for self-completness.
: If so, why not simply declare it as 'Object' instead of 'var'?
:
: I
: all
: the
: another
be 'Why not just declare it as 'Object' instead of 'int/double,...''?
And you can read more about anonymous method in c# 3.0 if interested.
【在 r****y 的大作中提到】
: Good explanation for self-completness.
: If so, why not simply declare it as 'Object' instead of 'var'?
:
: I
: all
: the
: another
v*n
12 楼
right, one more example, for query expression like
var q = from c in Custs
where c.age > 20
select new {c.name, c.city};
you don't know / want to know the type of q. let the compile do it for you.
【在 k****i 的大作中提到】
: Don't forget 'var' is just a declaration shortcut. The same question would
: be 'Why not just declare it as 'Object' instead of 'int/double,...''?
: And you can read more about anonymous method in c# 3.0 if interested.
var q = from c in Custs
where c.age > 20
select new {c.name, c.city};
you don't know / want to know the type of q. let the compile do it for you.
【在 k****i 的大作中提到】
: Don't forget 'var' is just a declaration shortcut. The same question would
: be 'Why not just declare it as 'Object' instead of 'int/double,...''?
: And you can read more about anonymous method in c# 3.0 if interested.
相关阅读
vb.net如何显示缩小后窗口消失的程序(已解决)Microsoft offers cash for writing Windows (Phone) apps那里可以搞到MCSD的题库吗?workflow foundation有人用吗?linq在debug的时候看不出错误的地方啊。俺求个湾区.net的refer (转载)webservice 只能定义一个函数吗?服了老印了SB要step down了新手请教:如何理解generic interface can be an retrun type请问怎样给页面设置一个倒计时timer,而且点任何键都不会停?how to get the days difference between "3/1/2013" and "6/1/2013"using c# to talk with MS SQL server for data mining系统集成和Mobile哪个更有未来?DotNet工作交流QQ群 (转载)Effective Async codingshare: 10 skills for developers to focus on in 2013版标改换了吧?有谁在做drupal programming吗? (转载)请推荐sharepoint编程的书或资料