w*i
2 楼
给谁看的？有什么效果？
05/08/2015: Immigrant Community is Anxious to Learn Whether the State
Deparment Implements Immigration Actions to Ensure Use of All Statutorily
Authorized Immigrant Visa Numbers
Immigrant community is more than ever waiting for the release of June 2015
Visa Bulletin to see whether the State Department is implementing immigrant
visa reform mandate of the President Obama. The USCIS has been seeking
stakeholders input on these issues and we have learned that the AILA
recommended to implement the following reforms. We fully agree with and
support the AILA's recommendations and ask the State Department to implement
the following reforms which may even not require the rule-making process.
Allocate immigrant visa numbers that Congress provided for and intended to
be issued, and recapture the immigrant visa numbers that were not issued in
past years: As reflected in INA §201, Congress clearly indicated its intent
to ensure that no available immigrant visa number should go unused. The
statutory scheme sets forth a system whereby unused employment-based visas
are to be passed to the family-based category and unused family-based visas
are to be passed over to the employment side. Moreover, under INA §203,
unused numbers within each of the family- and employment-based preferences
trickle down to the next preference within the broader categories. Yet
despite this clear mandate, it is reported that approximately 220,000 family
and employment-based visas have gone unused. Although recapture of unused
numbers has previously been accomplished through congressional action, the
INA does not specifically prohibit the State Department from exercising its
authority to recapture unused visas on its own. Moreover, cases indicating
that recapture is not possible are limited to or based on recapture of visas
under the DV lottery. Unlike the family- and employment-based preference
scheme, there is no congressional mandate for unused DV lottery numbers to
be carried over to the employment-based or family-based categories or vice
versa.
Ensurre that all of the immigrant visa numbers that Congress provides for
and intends to be issued each year are allocated going forward: USCIS should
take steps to improve data collection and data sharing with DOS to improve
“visibility” of petitions and applications pending at USCIS so that DOS
can better predict demand for visas and visa allocation across all
preference categories. This should include the development of capabilities
to track work in progress as well as multiple visa applications for the same
individual.
05/08/2015: Immigrant Community is Anxious to Learn Whether the State
Deparment Implements Immigration Actions to Ensure Use of All Statutorily
Authorized Immigrant Visa Numbers
Immigrant community is more than ever waiting for the release of June 2015
Visa Bulletin to see whether the State Department is implementing immigrant
visa reform mandate of the President Obama. The USCIS has been seeking
stakeholders input on these issues and we have learned that the AILA
recommended to implement the following reforms. We fully agree with and
support the AILA's recommendations and ask the State Department to implement
the following reforms which may even not require the rule-making process.
Allocate immigrant visa numbers that Congress provided for and intended to
be issued, and recapture the immigrant visa numbers that were not issued in
past years: As reflected in INA §201, Congress clearly indicated its intent
to ensure that no available immigrant visa number should go unused. The
statutory scheme sets forth a system whereby unused employment-based visas
are to be passed to the family-based category and unused family-based visas
are to be passed over to the employment side. Moreover, under INA §203,
unused numbers within each of the family- and employment-based preferences
trickle down to the next preference within the broader categories. Yet
despite this clear mandate, it is reported that approximately 220,000 family
and employment-based visas have gone unused. Although recapture of unused
numbers has previously been accomplished through congressional action, the
INA does not specifically prohibit the State Department from exercising its
authority to recapture unused visas on its own. Moreover, cases indicating
that recapture is not possible are limited to or based on recapture of visas
under the DV lottery. Unlike the family- and employment-based preference
scheme, there is no congressional mandate for unused DV lottery numbers to
be carried over to the employment-based or family-based categories or vice
versa.
Ensurre that all of the immigrant visa numbers that Congress provides for
and intends to be issued each year are allocated going forward: USCIS should
take steps to improve data collection and data sharing with DOS to improve
“visibility” of petitions and applications pending at USCIS so that DOS
can better predict demand for visas and visa allocation across all
preference categories. This should include the development of capabilities
to track work in progress as well as multiple visa applications for the same
individual.
l*i
3 楼
From some friend:
1. communicating with the interviewer all the time.
2. write clean code (you can reserve part of whiteboard as scratch pad),
make a plan before writing, define helper function if helps.
3. keep focused until you return to the lobby.
Lunch interviewer may not ask questions during lunch, but will ask coding
question right after lunch.
From previous post lz is quite nb so should expect an offer right after all
interviews are done. MSFT is very quick in giving a decision.
1. communicating with the interviewer all the time.
2. write clean code (you can reserve part of whiteboard as scratch pad),
make a plan before writing, define helper function if helps.
3. keep focused until you return to the lobby.
Lunch interviewer may not ask questions during lunch, but will ask coding
question right after lunch.
From previous post lz is quite nb so should expect an offer right after all
interviews are done. MSFT is very quick in giving a decision.
N*E
4 楼
哗众取宠 他什么都不知道 骗点击
c*i
5 楼
多谢多谢，好像m家onsite强度还是很大的，可惜也没啥时间准备了，只能自求多福了
M家面试应该怎么着装啊？
［在 lanti (Ice cream inside) 的大作中提到：］
:From some friend:
[发自未名空间iPhone版]
M家面试应该怎么着装啊？
［在 lanti (Ice cream inside) 的大作中提到：］
:From some friend:
[发自未名空间iPhone版]
Z*n
6 楼
意思就是搞一堆彩色玻璃球，每个移民种类设定一种颜色。国会每年把一大堆五颜六色
的玻璃球运送到移民局。移民局每发一张绿卡，就根据移民类别取出一颗玻璃球。每个
月底，移民局把取出来的那一小堆玻璃球送到国务院，让奥本带着助手数玻璃球。然后
奥本还要带助手到移民局去数剩下的玻璃球。每月1号到10号，奥本把剩下的玻璃球根
据本年度剩下的月份来进行分摊。十号发榜。奥本的任务就是把每年国会发的球，在财
政年度结束时一颗不剩如数送回到国会。国会再把这些球送到移民局，作为下一年度的
开支。
现在搞得这么乱，就是这些家伙自以为已经进化到不用数球了，会用数学和电脑了，结
果就是悲剧。
的玻璃球运送到移民局。移民局每发一张绿卡，就根据移民类别取出一颗玻璃球。每个
月底，移民局把取出来的那一小堆玻璃球送到国务院，让奥本带着助手数玻璃球。然后
奥本还要带助手到移民局去数剩下的玻璃球。每月1号到10号，奥本把剩下的玻璃球根
据本年度剩下的月份来进行分摊。十号发榜。奥本的任务就是把每年国会发的球，在财
政年度结束时一颗不剩如数送回到国会。国会再把这些球送到移民局，作为下一年度的
开支。
现在搞得这么乱，就是这些家伙自以为已经进化到不用数球了，会用数学和电脑了，结
果就是悲剧。
l*i
7 楼
Dress like you are at school. Suite is not necessary. Actually only PM
candidates wear suites. I saw a lot of jeans among candidates.
candidates wear suites. I saw a lot of jeans among candidates.
c*i
8 楼
非常感谢，穿牛仔裤运动鞋应该可以的吧？
【在 l***i 的大作中提到】
: Dress like you are at school. Suite is not necessary. Actually only PM
: candidates wear suites. I saw a lot of jeans among candidates.
l*i
9 楼
到时候方便卷袖子上白板就行，裤子不重要，干净整齐就好。多带一套衣服防止前一天
吃饭弄脏了。
吃饭弄脏了。
相关阅读
有没有 485 被 E.ARNDT签收的？请问 I-765 第16项填什么看见别人 pd 2007 10 月的批了,很生气是不是随便在哪里的派出所开出生证明都可以？给大家放松一下：小黄本找不到了体检小结为什么2类这么多？USCIS 485 inventory data is out (1/2012)Anybody's package delived by Fedex to AZ this morning?J1转F1豁免问题材料到底要不要重复3份预测：EB2 2012年3月VB收到Receipts了。夫妻异地填表地址问题包子求解：F1时期有在学校以外的收入会不会影响申请绿卡？请问大家都去哪里拿取无罪记录？关于AC21的那个180天 (转载)大家喝水不要忘记挖井人啊RD 1/9/2012,还没收到FP notice， 有类似经历的吗