我看了main support letter,不是很清楚it claims了哪几点,it回答了。。。 To address your specific questions: 1. I do not think that we want to or need to specifically identify the criteria that you meet for this immigration filing. Under a case called Kazarian v. USCIS, the ultimate goal is to convince USCIS that under the totality of the evidence presented that you meet the standards as an outstanding researcher. Over the years, I have structured with success my filings to create an overall picture of a researcher of attainment and outstanding capabilities rather than breaking down matters into their individual categories. I think that this is a better approach and I would ask for your understanding on this point.
马上就file了,求bless吧。从来没慌张过,这次完全是命在别人手里的感觉。1想赚 ref的钱想疯了。 前面工作过的公司,1用了6个不同的称呼,只见没有任何说明,比如说BOSTON DYNAMIC INCORPORATED, BOSTON, BOSTON DYNAMIC, BDI...1给我回信: Personally, I do not mind having different ways of referring to the same company since it adds a bit of variety to the document.