读到纽约时报一篇文章 - 未名空间MITBBS历史存档

国际科技财经博客移民网络热点娱乐民生时事公众号

Redian新闻

>未名空间

>Economics - 经济

读到纽约时报一篇文章

读到纽约时报一篇文章# Economics - 经济

n*n2099-10-12 07:10

1 楼

关于中国的贫富差距
有这么一段话：
"From comparative income equality in the mid-1980's, China in the last
decade has suddenly emerged as one of the most unequal countries in Asia,
surpassing countries like India and Indonesia, according to reports by
the World Bank and others.
China's disparities surpass those of the United States and Western Europe,
though they do not approach the extremes of Latin America."
哪位专家来谈一谈。//thanks

l*n2099-10-12 07:10

2 楼

贫富差距的扩大是改革的必然产物。但是，中国目前的程度，好像是有点高了。我觉
的这跟国内的一些体制，特权阶级有关。

【在 n****n 的大作中提到】

: 关于中国的贫富差距
: 有这么一段话：
: "From comparative income equality in the mid-1980's, China in the last
: decade has suddenly emerged as one of the most unequal countries in Asia,
: surpassing countries like India and Indonesia, according to reports by
: the World Bank and others.
: China's disparities surpass those of the United States and Western Europe,
: though they do not approach the extremes of Latin America."
: 哪位专家来谈一谈。//thanks

q*i2099-10-12 07:10

3 楼

I don't think there is anything wrong withunequality of wealth
in any society, as long as anyone is given an equal OPPORTUNITY
to sucess.
As a matter of fact, if the wealth is garantteed to be
evenly distributed to every member of the society, it would
have simply eliminated any incentive for innovation, hard working,
risk taking, etc., anything that addes value and wealth to
the society.
The focus should be on fairness in terms of opportunity, not fairness
in terms of results.

【在 n****n 的大作中提到】

bp2099-10-12 07:10

4 楼

极度的贫富差距如果没有众多的中产阶级来调和，结果一定是革命。
穷人革富人的命。所以老朱不惜一切代价报住粮食。
让所有人饭吃，有房住（这一点看来够戗）就没大事。

【在 q**i 的大作中提到】

: I don't think there is anything wrong withunequality of wealth
: in any society, as long as anyone is given an equal OPPORTUNITY
: to sucess.
: As a matter of fact, if the wealth is garantteed to be
: evenly distributed to every member of the society, it would
: have simply eliminated any incentive for innovation, hard working,
: risk taking, etc., anything that addes value and wealth to
: the society.
: The focus should be on fairness in terms of opportunity, not fairness
: in terms of results.

t*h2099-10-12 07:10

5 楼

But do think in China today people get equal (fair) opportunity?
I agree that evenly distributed wealth is not a good idea, but I
believe a sharp disparity in wealth will eventually lead to social
uprest in a society like China.

【在 q**i 的大作中提到】

g*a2099-10-12 07:10

6 楼

真的么，偶印象中中国的贫富悬殊好象只达到了中等发达资本主义国家水平压，
看来偶要update一下乐:)

hehe,首推巴西:)))q

【在 n****n 的大作中提到】

e*s2099-10-12 07:10

7 楼

I wonder which Volume you read?
It is concerned with the relationship between eco growth and inequality.
Kuznets(1955) introduced his now famous hypothesis that this relaiton follows
an inverted-U shape. A number of research have been done following Kuznets.
Various explanation accounts for this phenomena. Generally speaking, three
major processes brought the outcome.
1. labor force shifts from agriculture to industry;
2. rate of population growth;
3. spread of edu.
Gini coefficient of e

【在 n****n 的大作中提到】