m*u
2 楼
Not high for a one year and very unique coin...
Price GO GO GO GO GO!!!
Price GO GO GO GO GO!!!
p*n
3 楼
好久不来了, 赶上这么多人生日啊, 一并祝贺了...
爵猫你BSO的那张是shoreline lake吗? 好想念啊.
爵猫你BSO的那张是shoreline lake吗? 好想念啊.
t*a
4 楼
谢谢了
B*B
5 楼
springer的lecture notes in computer science里面,链接如下,万分感谢!
http://www.springerlink.com/content/y84524536t3312r0/
邮箱: g**************[email protected]
http://www.springerlink.com/content/y84524536t3312r0/
邮箱: g**************[email protected]
a*n
6 楼
Where to use 9000v?
In campus environment, one 9000v per building
dual 10G uplinks with multichasis ethernet channel
does 9000v have the DFC in it? How about mpls
support?
In campus environment, one 9000v per building
dual 10G uplinks with multichasis ethernet channel
does 9000v have the DFC in it? How about mpls
support?
t*u
7 楼
A typical seepage factor of safety check is FS = i(critical)/i(exit)
i(critical) equals effective unit weight divided by water unit weight.
The question is the exit gradient. If the facor of safety is defined
as above, what kind of exit gradient shoulld be used? Considering gradient
is a vector, the total value regarless of direction, or the vertical
component of the gradient?
I tend to use the vertical component, but our senior engineer says
the total gradient value should be used. Any comments
i(critical) equals effective unit weight divided by water unit weight.
The question is the exit gradient. If the facor of safety is defined
as above, what kind of exit gradient shoulld be used? Considering gradient
is a vector, the total value regarless of direction, or the vertical
component of the gradient?
I tend to use the vertical component, but our senior engineer says
the total gradient value should be used. Any comments
z*r
8 楼
【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
发信人: zinsser (zinsser), 信区: Military
标 题: 关于"国进民退"的误解
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Feb 11 19:59:15 2010, 美东)
误解1:西方国家实行的是市场经济和资本主义。中国也应该走小政府大市场的路。
正解:西方国家实行的不是市场经济,而是混合经济。所谓亚当斯密的小政府大市
场描述的是早已过时的英国工业革命后的时期。(这个理论甚至不能描述其他西方国家,有空以后再说).在一战之前,西方国家的政府支出只占gdp大概5%左右,在二战之后直到现在和
可预见的未来,由瑞典和美国的罗斯福发起社会民主改革(social democracy),政府支出占gdp的norm大概是30%(美国)到60%(瑞典).所有西方发达国家都在此
范围内(除了日本,日本的国债高得惊人).相比之下,中国现在的比例只有大概20%.大大低于西方国家的最低标准.
但是很奇怪的是social democracy是由美国发起而且一直忠实的执行的,它却不遗余力的
向中国和东欧国家推销小政府,大市场的概念.现在
发信人: zinsser (zinsser), 信区: Military
标 题: 关于"国进民退"的误解
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Feb 11 19:59:15 2010, 美东)
误解1:西方国家实行的是市场经济和资本主义。中国也应该走小政府大市场的路。
正解:西方国家实行的不是市场经济,而是混合经济。所谓亚当斯密的小政府大市
场描述的是早已过时的英国工业革命后的时期。(这个理论甚至不能描述其他西方国家,有空以后再说).在一战之前,西方国家的政府支出只占gdp大概5%左右,在二战之后直到现在和
可预见的未来,由瑞典和美国的罗斯福发起社会民主改革(social democracy),政府支出占gdp的norm大概是30%(美国)到60%(瑞典).所有西方发达国家都在此
范围内(除了日本,日本的国债高得惊人).相比之下,中国现在的比例只有大概20%.大大低于西方国家的最低标准.
但是很奇怪的是social democracy是由美国发起而且一直忠实的执行的,它却不遗余力的
向中国和东欧国家推销小政府,大市场的概念.现在
p*n
11 楼
还有文豪, 你送给爵猫的第二首法语歌 (Andrea Bocelli's Les Feuilles) 很经典的,
是他的代表作.
是他的代表作.
t*a
12 楼
铜制葫芦也可以。
f*h
14 楼
effective stress<0, quick happens. So it is all about vertical. I agree with
your judgment.
【在 t***u 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: A typical seepage factor of safety check is FS = i(critical)/i(exit)
: i(critical) equals effective unit weight divided by water unit weight.
: The question is the exit gradient. If the facor of safety is defined
: as above, what kind of exit gradient shoulld be used? Considering gradient
: is a vector, the total value regarless of direction, or the vertical
: component of the gradient?
: I tend to use the vertical component, but our senior engineer says
: the total gradient value should be used. Any comments
your judgment.
【在 t***u 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: A typical seepage factor of safety check is FS = i(critical)/i(exit)
: i(critical) equals effective unit weight divided by water unit weight.
: The question is the exit gradient. If the facor of safety is defined
: as above, what kind of exit gradient shoulld be used? Considering gradient
: is a vector, the total value regarless of direction, or the vertical
: component of the gradient?
: I tend to use the vertical component, but our senior engineer says
: the total gradient value should be used. Any comments
p*s
15 楼
写的真好,回军版去吧...
家,有空以后再说).在一战之前,西方国家的政府支出只占gdp大概5%左右,在二战之后
直到现在和
府支出占gdp的norm大概是30%(美国)到60%(瑞典).所有西方发达国家都在此
大低于西方国家的最低标准.
力的
【在 z*****r 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: zinsser (zinsser), 信区: Military
: 标 题: 关于"国进民退"的误解
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Feb 11 19:59:15 2010, 美东)
: 误解1:西方国家实行的是市场经济和资本主义。中国也应该走小政府大市场的路。
: 正解:西方国家实行的不是市场经济,而是混合经济。所谓亚当斯密的小政府大市
: 场描述的是早已过时的英国工业革命后的时期。(这个理论甚至不能描述其他西方国家,有空以后再说).在一战之前,西方国家的政府支出只占gdp大概5%左右,在二战之后直到现在和
: 可预见的未来,由瑞典和美国的罗斯福发起社会民主改革(social democracy),政府支出占gdp的norm大概是30%(美国)到60%(瑞典).所有西方发达国家都在此
: 范围内(除了日本,日本的国债高得惊人).相比之下,中国现在的比例只有大概20%.大大低于西方国家的最低标准.
: 但是很奇怪的是social democracy是由美国发起而且一直忠实的执行的,它却不遗余力的
家,有空以后再说).在一战之前,西方国家的政府支出只占gdp大概5%左右,在二战之后
直到现在和
府支出占gdp的norm大概是30%(美国)到60%(瑞典).所有西方发达国家都在此
大低于西方国家的最低标准.
力的
【在 z*****r 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 【 以下文字转载自 Military 讨论区 】
: 发信人: zinsser (zinsser), 信区: Military
: 标 题: 关于"国进民退"的误解
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Thu Feb 11 19:59:15 2010, 美东)
: 误解1:西方国家实行的是市场经济和资本主义。中国也应该走小政府大市场的路。
: 正解:西方国家实行的不是市场经济,而是混合经济。所谓亚当斯密的小政府大市
: 场描述的是早已过时的英国工业革命后的时期。(这个理论甚至不能描述其他西方国家,有空以后再说).在一战之前,西方国家的政府支出只占gdp大概5%左右,在二战之后直到现在和
: 可预见的未来,由瑞典和美国的罗斯福发起社会民主改革(social democracy),政府支出占gdp的norm大概是30%(美国)到60%(瑞典).所有西方发达国家都在此
: 范围内(除了日本,日本的国债高得惊人).相比之下,中国现在的比例只有大概20%.大大低于西方国家的最低标准.
: 但是很奇怪的是social democracy是由美国发起而且一直忠实的执行的,它却不遗余力的
x*g
16 楼
wow,10!
q*i
18 楼
难得小帕祝福一下,激动不已
t*h
19 楼
挂哪里?
c*i
20 楼
9000v is not a switch. if you want to put one per building to use as
aggregation for L2 switches, I don't think it's a good idea.
【在 a***n 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Where to use 9000v?
: In campus environment, one 9000v per building
: dual 10G uplinks with multichasis ethernet channel
: does 9000v have the DFC in it? How about mpls
: support?
aggregation for L2 switches, I don't think it's a good idea.
【在 a***n 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Where to use 9000v?
: In campus environment, one 9000v per building
: dual 10G uplinks with multichasis ethernet channel
: does 9000v have the DFC in it? How about mpls
: support?
H*E
21 楼
the equation you used was for vertical flow only.
so strictly say, that equation can only apply for vertical(upward) exit
gradient(magnitude).
if you want to consider total exit gradient, you need to decompose the total
exit gradient into horizontal and vertical components.
for horizontal component, the critical exit gradient can no longer
calculated by the equation you mentioned.
so strictly say, that equation can only apply for vertical(upward) exit
gradient(magnitude).
if you want to consider total exit gradient, you need to decompose the total
exit gradient into horizontal and vertical components.
for horizontal component, the critical exit gradient can no longer
calculated by the equation you mentioned.
a*n
24 楼
Just attended UCS tech-day, fabric interconnect
and fabric extender/IO Module is not learning MACs.
So not a switch. All traffic from extender/IOM has
to go thru fabric interconnect which could be connected
to Nexus 5k.
9000v is more like a fabric extender or IO module?
It looks like wireless and wired architecture are
converging.
We have
thick/autonomous AP - standalong switch
thin AP - fabric extender
wireless controller - ASR 9000 to 9000v
【在 c*****i 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 9000v is not a switch. if you want to put one per building to use as
: aggregation for L2 switches, I don't think it's a good idea.
and fabric extender/IO Module is not learning MACs.
So not a switch. All traffic from extender/IOM has
to go thru fabric interconnect which could be connected
to Nexus 5k.
9000v is more like a fabric extender or IO module?
It looks like wireless and wired architecture are
converging.
We have
thick/autonomous AP - standalong switch
thin AP - fabric extender
wireless controller - ASR 9000 to 9000v
【在 c*****i 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 9000v is not a switch. if you want to put one per building to use as
: aggregation for L2 switches, I don't think it's a good idea.
相关阅读
Need 2 Papers金融风暴的一些思考F1从美国去加拿大以及回来需要签证吗?国内院校的面试问题微观经济学问题求助!paper under second round review是什么意思? (转载)请教眼前金融危机方面著作奥巴马走上历史的钢丝绳 (码十) (比较长)ESSEC Business School--anybody has heard of it?请问“off-prints”是什么?边际效用与美国饭店用餐科普问题请教 (转载)已经发出interview invitation的国内院校美国政府干预经济的教训 (转载)有关国际会议华中科技大学管理学院招聘启事(SOM of HUST, Recruit Talents节日快乐,顺便给去AEA面试的孩子们提个醒有没有想去SF玩的问个更初级的endnote问题一个关于货币的问题