i*f
8 楼
But what it pays off is not its own data. AP is forwarding other nodes data
in the WLAN.
So i think AP's accessing to the channel should be garanteed, but it SEEMS
AP doesn't get any priority to its subscribers in the WLAN.
Is this the trueth or I misunderstand something in the standard???
【在 X*****r 的大作中提到】
: that is why it is called AP
: others just nodes
: enjoy a decent and high title and pays off
:
: the
in the WLAN.
So i think AP's accessing to the channel should be garanteed, but it SEEMS
AP doesn't get any priority to its subscribers in the WLAN.
Is this the trueth or I misunderstand something in the standard???
【在 X*****r 的大作中提到】
: that is why it is called AP
: others just nodes
: enjoy a decent and high title and pays off
:
: the
X*r
9 楼
true
data
【在 i*****f 的大作中提到】
: But what it pays off is not its own data. AP is forwarding other nodes data
: in the WLAN.
: So i think AP's accessing to the channel should be garanteed, but it SEEMS
: AP doesn't get any priority to its subscribers in the WLAN.
: Is this the trueth or I misunderstand something in the standard???
data
【在 i*****f 的大作中提到】
: But what it pays off is not its own data. AP is forwarding other nodes data
: in the WLAN.
: So i think AP's accessing to the channel should be garanteed, but it SEEMS
: AP doesn't get any priority to its subscribers in the WLAN.
: Is this the trueth or I misunderstand something in the standard???
c*n
10 楼
in most of the time, AP doesn't have its "own" data...
the most commonly seen AP is a wireless router... how much traffic
itself will generate?
data
【在 i*****f 的大作中提到】
: But what it pays off is not its own data. AP is forwarding other nodes data
: in the WLAN.
: So i think AP's accessing to the channel should be garanteed, but it SEEMS
: AP doesn't get any priority to its subscribers in the WLAN.
: Is this the trueth or I misunderstand something in the standard???
the most commonly seen AP is a wireless router... how much traffic
itself will generate?
data
【在 i*****f 的大作中提到】
: But what it pays off is not its own data. AP is forwarding other nodes data
: in the WLAN.
: So i think AP's accessing to the channel should be garanteed, but it SEEMS
: AP doesn't get any priority to its subscribers in the WLAN.
: Is this the trueth or I misunderstand something in the standard???
i*f
11 楼
I didn't mean that it's not fair for AP ITSELF.
See, suppose the WLAN is very heavy-loaded. And all the traffic's
destination is in the WLAN (i.e., other nodes in the WLAN).
If the AP's chance to access the channel is the same as a normal node. It
seems that AP will never be able to forward all this traffic.
【在 c****n 的大作中提到】
: in most of the time, AP doesn't have its "own" data...
: the most commonly seen AP is a wireless router... how much traffic
: itself will generate?
:
: data
See, suppose the WLAN is very heavy-loaded. And all the traffic's
destination is in the WLAN (i.e., other nodes in the WLAN).
If the AP's chance to access the channel is the same as a normal node. It
seems that AP will never be able to forward all this traffic.
【在 c****n 的大作中提到】
: in most of the time, AP doesn't have its "own" data...
: the most commonly seen AP is a wireless router... how much traffic
: itself will generate?
:
: data
c*n
12 楼
what's the unfairness then? everyone needs the AP forwarding
both the data and ACK
【在 i*****f 的大作中提到】
: I didn't mean that it's not fair for AP ITSELF.
: See, suppose the WLAN is very heavy-loaded. And all the traffic's
: destination is in the WLAN (i.e., other nodes in the WLAN).
: If the AP's chance to access the channel is the same as a normal node. It
: seems that AP will never be able to forward all this traffic.
both the data and ACK
【在 i*****f 的大作中提到】
: I didn't mean that it's not fair for AP ITSELF.
: See, suppose the WLAN is very heavy-loaded. And all the traffic's
: destination is in the WLAN (i.e., other nodes in the WLAN).
: If the AP's chance to access the channel is the same as a normal node. It
: seems that AP will never be able to forward all this traffic.
X*r
14 楼
as I told you, it is the DESTINY of the AP
like pigs, most of them got food since they will be your food someday
unfair, isn't it?
APs are like pigs, their lives are predetermined, i.e., serving people, when
they are created/breeded
it is unfair, i agree...
【在 i*****f 的大作中提到】
: I didn't mean that it's not fair for AP ITSELF.
: See, suppose the WLAN is very heavy-loaded. And all the traffic's
: destination is in the WLAN (i.e., other nodes in the WLAN).
: If the AP's chance to access the channel is the same as a normal node. It
: seems that AP will never be able to forward all this traffic.
like pigs, most of them got food since they will be your food someday
unfair, isn't it?
APs are like pigs, their lives are predetermined, i.e., serving people, when
they are created/breeded
it is unfair, i agree...
【在 i*****f 的大作中提到】
: I didn't mean that it's not fair for AP ITSELF.
: See, suppose the WLAN is very heavy-loaded. And all the traffic's
: destination is in the WLAN (i.e., other nodes in the WLAN).
: If the AP's chance to access the channel is the same as a normal node. It
: seems that AP will never be able to forward all this traffic.
c*n
18 楼
c*n
29 楼
:) if everyone's in csma/ca, no problem even if in dcf
because everyone's contention windows would grow up
and the maximum contention windows size corresponds to the
maximum number of nodes allowd to associate with one AP
【在 X*****r 的大作中提到】
: well
: if the attacker does not follow 821.11
: yes, you are right
: but this is the problem of CSMA/CA
because everyone's contention windows would grow up
and the maximum contention windows size corresponds to the
maximum number of nodes allowd to associate with one AP
【在 X*****r 的大作中提到】
: well
: if the attacker does not follow 821.11
: yes, you are right
: but this is the problem of CSMA/CA
z*n
30 楼
There are two versions for AP:
802.11 DCF and 802.11PCF
in the original mode AP acts exactly the same as other
nodes(mobile stations), in this case AP is potentially
a bottleneck of the system.
802.11PCF is aimed to solve this problem. In PCF, AP
usually waits a less interframe gap than other nodes,
thus giving AP an advantage to catch the channel.
the
【在 i*****f 的大作中提到】
: Then in infrastructure mode. The AP needs to forward all the traffic in the
: WLAN, using the same contention scheme? Isn't it unfair for the AP?
802.11 DCF and 802.11PCF
in the original mode AP acts exactly the same as other
nodes(mobile stations), in this case AP is potentially
a bottleneck of the system.
802.11PCF is aimed to solve this problem. In PCF, AP
usually waits a less interframe gap than other nodes,
thus giving AP an advantage to catch the channel.
the
【在 i*****f 的大作中提到】
: Then in infrastructure mode. The AP needs to forward all the traffic in the
: WLAN, using the same contention scheme? Isn't it unfair for the AP?
相关阅读
求Qualcomm内推请问在半导体公司,做OPC和process engineer各有什么优缺点?谢谢求审稿机会, 电路方向,biosensor或者image sensor包子求电子书!求助电容[bssd]10年前EE比现在好很多,为什么?重金求审稿机会求职行业的迷惑请问各位大侠:涉及到SRAM的数字电路设计需要注意什么?找工作前想补习一下c++,推荐看什么书(别太厚)哪个公司可以焊epc2007这样的非常小的component今年很多EE企业都出了问题做analog/RF IC设计收入有多少?湾区哪能读part timeEE ph.d? 最好是power electronic or analog IC designTX Dallas Job Opportunity有兄弟分享下Apple硬件组的面经吗请问在美国申请专利需要的材料各位大仙 请问这个电路是做什么用的Anybody can share the datasheet of AZ 7908 Photoresist?consulting needed for Android based programing