Redian新闻
>
what's the best TCP patch for linux kernel?
avatar
what's the best TCP patch for linux kernel?# EmergingNetworking - 热门网络技术
p*u
1
Like reactivity access/security gateway, it processes incoming XML traffic,
sends HTTP or so requests to back end servers, to invoke web services. after
it gets the responses back, it will assemble XML responses then send back
to clients. I am guessing during this whole process, there must be something
that needs improve. How about a modified TCP/IP stack inside kernel?
e.g., a almost obsolete patch, T/TCP. any ideas?
avatar
z*r
2
pure software? then what's the benefit? you still need cpu cycles to process
tcp

【在 p*u 的大作中提到】
: Like reactivity access/security gateway, it processes incoming XML traffic,
: sends HTTP or so requests to back end servers, to invoke web services. after
: it gets the responses back, it will assemble XML responses then send back
: to clients. I am guessing during this whole process, there must be something
: that needs improve. How about a modified TCP/IP stack inside kernel?
: e.g., a almost obsolete patch, T/TCP. any ideas?

avatar
p*u
3
i said for the gateway, e.g. reactivity's products.

【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: pure software? then what's the benefit? you still need cpu cycles to process
: tcp

avatar
z*r
4
normally it could be 5 times faster even just offload the tcp stuff to a NIC.
If tcp gets offloaded to an application gateway, it could be 10 times faster
depending on the application type. coz, not only the tcp itself gets speeded,
also the application protocols/payload get compressed, optimized, or whatever
avatar
m*t
5
usually the tcp checksum is offloaded to NICs, but not sure how much that
really benefits? XML accelerator can be useful

【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: pure software? then what's the benefit? you still need cpu cycles to process
: tcp

avatar
p*u
6
hehe, my question should be how to design a good offload engine, software.

【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: normally it could be 5 times faster even just offload the tcp stuff to a NIC.
: If tcp gets offloaded to an application gateway, it could be 10 times faster
: depending on the application type. coz, not only the tcp itself gets speeded,
: also the application protocols/payload get compressed, optimized, or whatever

avatar
z*r
7
I think what you need is really a TCP offload engine, right now, there are a
couple of NICs which can support this.

【在 p*u 的大作中提到】
: Like reactivity access/security gateway, it processes incoming XML traffic,
: sends HTTP or so requests to back end servers, to invoke web services. after
: it gets the responses back, it will assemble XML responses then send back
: to clients. I am guessing during this whole process, there must be something
: that needs improve. How about a modified TCP/IP stack inside kernel?
: e.g., a almost obsolete patch, T/TCP. any ideas?

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。