Redian新闻
>
Acer Aspire TimelineX AS1830T-68U118 11.6-Inch
avatar
Acer Aspire TimelineX AS1830T-68U118 11.6-Inch# Hardware - 计算机硬件
s*e
1
两年前发了一篇文章到本领域(光学)的一份主流杂志,提出了一个新观点。目前引用
也还不错,有近三十次了。今天看到有一个欧洲的group刚online了一篇Nature子刊,
他们所声称的核心新观点就是我们那篇文章中的观点,方法和核心结果都相似,只是讨
论作了一点延伸而已。可是,他们没有引用我们的文章,也没有引用另一篇我认为必引
的重要文献,误导别人他们是这一观点的首创者。我感觉80%的可能性是他们故意不引
我们的文章,因为有几个提法太相似了,不太可能是巧合。这一点让我很生气,简直是
为了promote自己的原创性而不择手段。reviewers也太不负责,这样一篇incremental
的文章居然在Nature子刊蒙混过关。还有一点我担心的是,因为他们的杂志更好,以后
人们更可能引用他们的文章了,而忘了真正的首创者。有没有什么好办法可以fight?
给editor写信有用么?谢谢!
avatar
a*e
2
According to a Comerica CSR, anyone can open a personal checking account and
qualify. Here's Comerica's promotion page for this $100 bonus.
http://campaign.comerica.com/campaign/fall10/employee
One thing nice about this bonus is that it doesn't require direct deposit.
They state that you can substitute a recurring ACH payment. Here are the
requirement details:
Open a new Comerica personal checking account by November 30, 2010
Establish and use qualifying products and/or services within 90 days of
checking account opening, which include:
Establish a direct deposit of at least $150 per statement cycle OR establish
recurring ACH payments with a monthly total of at least $150
Sign up for a Comerica Check Card OR Comerica Web Bill Pay, and make at
least 10 transactions totaling $250
Register online for the program by November 30, 2010 (Enter your account
number to register for the Office Perks program)
Here's some of the important small print:
Offer available to new checking account customers only.
Your participation will begin the first full calendar month after you have
registered for this offer. New checking account must remain open and active
(5 or more transactions per statement cycle) and be in good standing at the
time the bonus is paid.
Comerica will verify that you have met the offer terms during the tracking
period of Oct 2010 - Feb 2011 and qualifying bonus payments will be credited
to your Comerica checking account by Apr 15, 2011, provided your account
and service(s) qualify.
The maximum bonus any consumer may receive is $100. Bonus is considered
interest and will be reported on IRS Form 1099-INT.
Potential Monthly Fees
The main issue with Comerica's checking accounts is that they all have
potential monthly fees. The checking account that is easiest to have the
fees waived is the Access Checking. Fees can be waived if you maintain a $
800 minimum balance, or have direct deposit, or own a house or are a full
time college student. There's also a quarterly inactivity fee that you have
to watch out for.
No Branch Visit Required
According to a Comerica CSR, if you don't live near a branch, you can open
the checking account and qualify for the bonus by applying by phone. When
Comerica was offering a $300 bonus last April I received more info from
Comerica about their account application process. I was told that people in
any state can qualify. If you don't live near a branch, they'll mail you the
account opening kit. The CSR wasn't sure if they do a hard credit inquiry.
She could only confirm that they do use ChexSystem. Last year I was told by
a CSR that their credit inquiry is soft and not a hard pull.
http://www.depositaccounts.com/blog/2010/10/comerica-banks-100-checking-account-bonus.html
avatar
p*n
3
女朋友拿到旅游签证来美国,有下面两个问题。
1.如果只买了单程机票,没有买返程机票,入关的时候会不会有问题,因为想后面再买
返程票
2.入关的时候如果说来美国旅游两周,一般入境官会给多久的时间待在美国,会给6个
月吗
谢谢
avatar
f*h
5
If I were you I will definitely write to the editor. I don't know how the
editor will handle it but I will point it out to him.
avatar
r*r
6
hard pull?

and
establish

【在 a*******e 的大作中提到】
: According to a Comerica CSR, anyone can open a personal checking account and
: qualify. Here's Comerica's promotion page for this $100 bonus.
: http://campaign.comerica.com/campaign/fall10/employee
: One thing nice about this bonus is that it doesn't require direct deposit.
: They state that you can substitute a recurring ACH payment. Here are the
: requirement details:
: Open a new Comerica personal checking account by November 30, 2010
: Establish and use qualifying products and/or services within 90 days of
: checking account opening, which include:
: Establish a direct deposit of at least $150 per statement cycle OR establish

avatar
c*8
7
如果你有 AA 的里程账户,不需有足够的里程,可以免费HOLD一张反程票最多五天有效
,入关后就可以撤销HOLD,不撤销可能也没关系。其它航空公司也有HOLD的服务,不过
需要花几块钱,能HOLD时间的时间也不一样。好像土耳其航空能HOLD 二十多天。

:女朋友拿到旅游签证来美国,有下面两个问题。
:1.如果只买了单程机票,没有买返程机票,入关的时候会不会有问题,因为想后面再买
avatar
p*l
8
觉得nature子刊上技术性文章水平现在下滑了,感觉编辑不得力,找的review太外行。
我也见过别人已经发表过的东西,穿个华丽的马甲上nature子刊的事,而且马甲还穿错
了,挂羊头卖狗肉吹得好欢。
avatar
f*d
9
Does ALLY/ING/paypal...treat as DD in order to waive the monthly fee?

and
establish

【在 a*******e 的大作中提到】
: According to a Comerica CSR, anyone can open a personal checking account and
: qualify. Here's Comerica's promotion page for this $100 bonus.
: http://campaign.comerica.com/campaign/fall10/employee
: One thing nice about this bonus is that it doesn't require direct deposit.
: They state that you can substitute a recurring ACH payment. Here are the
: requirement details:
: Open a new Comerica personal checking account by November 30, 2010
: Establish and use qualifying products and/or services within 90 days of
: checking account opening, which include:
: Establish a direct deposit of at least $150 per statement cycle OR establish

avatar
t*d
10
根本不看回程的。
avatar
H*g
11
估计没用,文章已经发了,你指望editor给你什么回复呢?

incremental

【在 s**e 的大作中提到】
: 两年前发了一篇文章到本领域(光学)的一份主流杂志,提出了一个新观点。目前引用
: 也还不错,有近三十次了。今天看到有一个欧洲的group刚online了一篇Nature子刊,
: 他们所声称的核心新观点就是我们那篇文章中的观点,方法和核心结果都相似,只是讨
: 论作了一点延伸而已。可是,他们没有引用我们的文章,也没有引用另一篇我认为必引
: 的重要文献,误导别人他们是这一观点的首创者。我感觉80%的可能性是他们故意不引
: 我们的文章,因为有几个提法太相似了,不太可能是巧合。这一点让我很生气,简直是
: 为了promote自己的原创性而不择手段。reviewers也太不负责,这样一篇incremental
: 的文章居然在Nature子刊蒙混过关。还有一点我担心的是,因为他们的杂志更好,以后
: 人们更可能引用他们的文章了,而忘了真正的首创者。有没有什么好办法可以fight?
: 给editor写信有用么?谢谢!

avatar
a*e
12
"The CSR wasn't sure if they do a hard credit inquiry.
She could only confirm that they do use ChexSystem. Last year I was told by
a CSR that their credit inquiry is soft and not a hard pull."
avatar
j*n
13
如果够不上剽窃,那么可能做的就是私下给你那杂志和这个新杂志的编辑写信,指出你的
观点
或者请个业内朋友,最好比较牛的,写comment on这篇新文章
最后没办法,把文章贴出来,自己或请光学专家点评,发给方先生

incremental

【在 s**e 的大作中提到】
: 两年前发了一篇文章到本领域(光学)的一份主流杂志,提出了一个新观点。目前引用
: 也还不错,有近三十次了。今天看到有一个欧洲的group刚online了一篇Nature子刊,
: 他们所声称的核心新观点就是我们那篇文章中的观点,方法和核心结果都相似,只是讨
: 论作了一点延伸而已。可是,他们没有引用我们的文章,也没有引用另一篇我认为必引
: 的重要文献,误导别人他们是这一观点的首创者。我感觉80%的可能性是他们故意不引
: 我们的文章,因为有几个提法太相似了,不太可能是巧合。这一点让我很生气,简直是
: 为了promote自己的原创性而不择手段。reviewers也太不负责,这样一篇incremental
: 的文章居然在Nature子刊蒙混过关。还有一点我担心的是,因为他们的杂志更好,以后
: 人们更可能引用他们的文章了,而忘了真正的首创者。有没有什么好办法可以fight?
: 给editor写信有用么?谢谢!

avatar
r*r
14
thanks a lot :)

by

【在 a*******e 的大作中提到】
: "The CSR wasn't sure if they do a hard credit inquiry.
: She could only confirm that they do use ChexSystem. Last year I was told by
: a CSR that their credit inquiry is soft and not a hard pull."

avatar
w*g
15
他们那篇paper可能投了5年才中,你急什么。独立发现的事情多的去了,你觉得你的观
点能得诺贝尔奖?武功不行可以练好,心态不行那就没办法了。

incremental

【在 s**e 的大作中提到】
: 两年前发了一篇文章到本领域(光学)的一份主流杂志,提出了一个新观点。目前引用
: 也还不错,有近三十次了。今天看到有一个欧洲的group刚online了一篇Nature子刊,
: 他们所声称的核心新观点就是我们那篇文章中的观点,方法和核心结果都相似,只是讨
: 论作了一点延伸而已。可是,他们没有引用我们的文章,也没有引用另一篇我认为必引
: 的重要文献,误导别人他们是这一观点的首创者。我感觉80%的可能性是他们故意不引
: 我们的文章,因为有几个提法太相似了,不太可能是巧合。这一点让我很生气,简直是
: 为了promote自己的原创性而不择手段。reviewers也太不负责,这样一篇incremental
: 的文章居然在Nature子刊蒙混过关。还有一点我担心的是,因为他们的杂志更好,以后
: 人们更可能引用他们的文章了,而忘了真正的首创者。有没有什么好办法可以fight?
: 给editor写信有用么?谢谢!

avatar
y*c
16
Thanks

by

【在 a*******e 的大作中提到】
: "The CSR wasn't sure if they do a hard credit inquiry.
: She could only confirm that they do use ChexSystem. Last year I was told by
: a CSR that their credit inquiry is soft and not a hard pull."

avatar
M*o
17
写个comments扔过去

incremental

【在 s**e 的大作中提到】
: 两年前发了一篇文章到本领域(光学)的一份主流杂志,提出了一个新观点。目前引用
: 也还不错,有近三十次了。今天看到有一个欧洲的group刚online了一篇Nature子刊,
: 他们所声称的核心新观点就是我们那篇文章中的观点,方法和核心结果都相似,只是讨
: 论作了一点延伸而已。可是,他们没有引用我们的文章,也没有引用另一篇我认为必引
: 的重要文献,误导别人他们是这一观点的首创者。我感觉80%的可能性是他们故意不引
: 我们的文章,因为有几个提法太相似了,不太可能是巧合。这一点让我很生气,简直是
: 为了promote自己的原创性而不择手段。reviewers也太不负责,这样一篇incremental
: 的文章居然在Nature子刊蒙混过关。还有一点我担心的是,因为他们的杂志更好,以后
: 人们更可能引用他们的文章了,而忘了真正的首创者。有没有什么好办法可以fight?
: 给editor写信有用么?谢谢!

avatar
w*r
18
用paypal怎么搞Automated Payments.?
avatar
p*l
19
光学行业拼的是好想法,试验周期一般比较短。很多时候,一个很好的文章出来,同行
的反应是:我怎么没想到这点。有了想法以后,literature search是必须的,自以为
自己比别人聪明是不行的。
这种明显re-invent的文章,如果投到光学专业杂志,被抓住的几率大的多。

【在 w***g 的大作中提到】
: 他们那篇paper可能投了5年才中,你急什么。独立发现的事情多的去了,你觉得你的观
: 点能得诺贝尔奖?武功不行可以练好,心态不行那就没办法了。
:
: incremental

avatar
g*e
20
谢谢!
bonus给的太晚
avatar
p*g
21
必须写comment 或者correspondence 之类的文章,指出来。
avatar
y*c
22
打电话开户之后
收到Email
说要我寄SSN card的copy过去
第一次遇到要这种资料的
正常吗?
avatar
a*e
23
正常,我都遇到几回了

【在 y****c 的大作中提到】
: 打电话开户之后
: 收到Email
: 说要我寄SSN card的copy过去
: 第一次遇到要这种资料的
: 正常吗?

avatar
a*e
24
是啊,要ach push 5 cycles,我也没想好是否要跳这个

【在 g***e 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢!
: bonus给的太晚

avatar
g*e
25
这个银行服务如何?
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。