I disagree. Search is very tim consuming and energy consuming. Search committee tend to be exhausted at the end. If you are prepared, go early is good.
【在 f***a 的大作中提到】 : 我也偏向于最后一个!因为通常情况下,最后出现的人和事物给人的印象最深,只要你 : 的表现和前两个一样好,那他们对你的印象就是最深的。除非你比前两个差很多。否则 : 是最后一个有优势。 : This is called recency effect.
We could theoretically do a study on this, surveying search committees and find out there is a significant correlation. There is also the primacy effect (people remembering the first thing/person better than what follows) but recency effect might be a little stronger than primacy effect. This is established psychological phenomenon. In my own case, totally anecdotal evidence, I've got 3 offers so far, I was the last one to interview for all of them.
【在 s********n 的大作中提到】 : I disagree. Search is very tim consuming and energy consuming. Search : committee tend to be exhausted at the end. : If you are prepared, go early is good.
lol you guys have totally different opinions on this that was why I chose the middle one.
person than was
【在 f***a 的大作中提到】 : We could theoretically do a study on this, surveying search committees and : find out there is a significant correlation. : There is also the primacy effect (people remembering the first thing/person : better than what follows) but recency effect might be a little stronger than : primacy effect. : This is established psychological phenomenon. : In my own case, totally anecdotal evidence, I've got 3 offers so far, I was : the last one to interview for all of them.
【在 f***a 的大作中提到】 : 其实选第一个和选最后一个都有优势,这种优势是心理学上已经证实了的现象,google : serial position effect。但是只有中间的,是最容易被人遗忘的。。。。。。 : anyway,很牛的话,可能也没有什么太大的关系。毕竟次序不是决定因素。 : best of luck to you!
【在 f***a 的大作中提到】 : 其实选第一个和选最后一个都有优势,这种优势是心理学上已经证实了的现象,google : serial position effect。但是只有中间的,是最容易被人遗忘的。。。。。。 : anyway,很牛的话,可能也没有什么太大的关系。毕竟次序不是决定因素。 : best of luck to you!
【在 f***a 的大作中提到】 : 其实选第一个和选最后一个都有优势,这种优势是心理学上已经证实了的现象,google : serial position effect。但是只有中间的,是最容易被人遗忘的。。。。。。 : anyway,很牛的话,可能也没有什么太大的关系。毕竟次序不是决定因素。 : best of luck to you!