c*n
2 楼
Alex, Dec-20 10:38 (PST):
That is a difficult manual fix. You ended up with more cashback this way, so
I'm just going to leave it as is!
-Alex
Me Dec-09 01:06 (PST):
Hi there
I participated the AMEX's gift chain last week and purchased 10 giftcards fr
om REI, along with some ordinary transaction on REI.com. I noticed that I wa
s mistakenly granted dealcash back for the giftcard purchase from REI while
the ordinary transaction did not receive the dealcash back because the it ha
s been max-out by the giftcards.
please fix this problem.
thanks!
That is a difficult manual fix. You ended up with more cashback this way, so
I'm just going to leave it as is!
-Alex
Me Dec-09 01:06 (PST):
Hi there
I participated the AMEX's gift chain last week and purchased 10 giftcards fr
om REI, along with some ordinary transaction on REI.com. I noticed that I wa
s mistakenly granted dealcash back for the giftcard purchase from REI while
the ordinary transaction did not receive the dealcash back because the it ha
s been max-out by the giftcards.
please fix this problem.
thanks!
k*e
3 楼
现在h1b返签,给的是几次entry?是不是一年之内2次?
z*e
4 楼
你要认识到八股文是我国古代的一项伟大创新,只不过这百年来受到了太多无知诋毁,
其价值本就来等于或者大于所谓的四大发明。
其价值本就来等于或者大于所谓的四大发明。
b*s
5 楼
baozipls
l*t
8 楼
pai
so
fr
wa
while
ha
【在 c******n 的大作中提到】
: Alex, Dec-20 10:38 (PST):
: That is a difficult manual fix. You ended up with more cashback this way, so
: I'm just going to leave it as is!
: -Alex
: Me Dec-09 01:06 (PST):
: Hi there
: I participated the AMEX's gift chain last week and purchased 10 giftcards fr
: om REI, along with some ordinary transaction on REI.com. I noticed that I wa
: s mistakenly granted dealcash back for the giftcard purchase from REI while
: the ordinary transaction did not receive the dealcash back because the it ha
so
fr
wa
while
ha
【在 c******n 的大作中提到】
: Alex, Dec-20 10:38 (PST):
: That is a difficult manual fix. You ended up with more cashback this way, so
: I'm just going to leave it as is!
: -Alex
: Me Dec-09 01:06 (PST):
: Hi there
: I participated the AMEX's gift chain last week and purchased 10 giftcards fr
: om REI, along with some ordinary transaction on REI.com. I noticed that I wa
: s mistakenly granted dealcash back for the giftcard purchase from REI while
: the ordinary transaction did not receive the dealcash back because the it ha
k*e
9 楼
有没有一年多次的情况?
多谢。
多谢。
H*N
10 楼
In many ways, yew. So are papers.
a*y
12 楼
just looked at what 八股 really is. man this is what we are required to do
in papers. It would have been easier to write papers if we were trained to
do 八股, haha.
in papers. It would have been easier to write papers if we were trained to
do 八股, haha.
s*g
15 楼
well...
since it is not a lot of money and u showed that u r honest
(and u do have other REI purchases which would get u deal cb)
if I were Alex, I would leave it there to make the customer happy, haha
anyway, cong
since it is not a lot of money and u showed that u r honest
(and u do have other REI purchases which would get u deal cb)
if I were Alex, I would leave it there to make the customer happy, haha
anyway, cong
H*y
18 楼
我不这么看。任何行业都有它的规章制度和惯例,是为了更公平的审理。比如你要是写
了一本小说,要卖给agent或者publisher,你必须要按照比写grant还严格的八股来写
一个pitch,每一段怎么写,甚至怎么一句话描述你的书(是个多少字的什么genre的书
,书名要All CAPS)。如果我跟在座的同时各自写一个,人家会仔细看我的,您的没有
遵守这个范例就马上给删了,因为知道您不是干这行的,连起码行规都不知道。
试想如果grant没有significant/innovation这些硬格式,每个申请人的都千奇百怪,
五花八门,那审理的时候就容易被这些格式方面的东西影响,而不能focus真正有用的
信息。或者又沦落成看PI名气了,只能对我们更不利。
了一本小说,要卖给agent或者publisher,你必须要按照比写grant还严格的八股来写
一个pitch,每一段怎么写,甚至怎么一句话描述你的书(是个多少字的什么genre的书
,书名要All CAPS)。如果我跟在座的同时各自写一个,人家会仔细看我的,您的没有
遵守这个范例就马上给删了,因为知道您不是干这行的,连起码行规都不知道。
试想如果grant没有significant/innovation这些硬格式,每个申请人的都千奇百怪,
五花八门,那审理的时候就容易被这些格式方面的东西影响,而不能focus真正有用的
信息。或者又沦落成看PI名气了,只能对我们更不利。
a*a
19 楼
各位request 的 check都多久到,我都一个多月了,连影都没有,网页一直显示Have
an Outstanding Request.
an Outstanding Request.
s*y
20 楼
楼主没说八股文不好啊。
八股文的出现就是为了方便古代的评委来给不同地方不同年纪不同经历的才子们按统一
个标准打分用的。
Grant application 的格式也是这个动机。
【在 H****y 的大作中提到】
: 我不这么看。任何行业都有它的规章制度和惯例,是为了更公平的审理。比如你要是写
: 了一本小说,要卖给agent或者publisher,你必须要按照比写grant还严格的八股来写
: 一个pitch,每一段怎么写,甚至怎么一句话描述你的书(是个多少字的什么genre的书
: ,书名要All CAPS)。如果我跟在座的同时各自写一个,人家会仔细看我的,您的没有
: 遵守这个范例就马上给删了,因为知道您不是干这行的,连起码行规都不知道。
: 试想如果grant没有significant/innovation这些硬格式,每个申请人的都千奇百怪,
: 五花八门,那审理的时候就容易被这些格式方面的东西影响,而不能focus真正有用的
: 信息。或者又沦落成看PI名气了,只能对我们更不利。
八股文的出现就是为了方便古代的评委来给不同地方不同年纪不同经历的才子们按统一
个标准打分用的。
Grant application 的格式也是这个动机。
【在 H****y 的大作中提到】
: 我不这么看。任何行业都有它的规章制度和惯例,是为了更公平的审理。比如你要是写
: 了一本小说,要卖给agent或者publisher,你必须要按照比写grant还严格的八股来写
: 一个pitch,每一段怎么写,甚至怎么一句话描述你的书(是个多少字的什么genre的书
: ,书名要All CAPS)。如果我跟在座的同时各自写一个,人家会仔细看我的,您的没有
: 遵守这个范例就马上给删了,因为知道您不是干这行的,连起码行规都不知道。
: 试想如果grant没有significant/innovation这些硬格式,每个申请人的都千奇百怪,
: 五花八门,那审理的时候就容易被这些格式方面的东西影响,而不能focus真正有用的
: 信息。或者又沦落成看PI名气了,只能对我们更不利。
t*u
22 楼
以后都是电脑初审
M*P
23 楼
我郁闷的是你必须要加入怎么 involve undergrads in research and statement
about diversity.
【在 H****y 的大作中提到】
: 我不这么看。任何行业都有它的规章制度和惯例,是为了更公平的审理。比如你要是写
: 了一本小说,要卖给agent或者publisher,你必须要按照比写grant还严格的八股来写
: 一个pitch,每一段怎么写,甚至怎么一句话描述你的书(是个多少字的什么genre的书
: ,书名要All CAPS)。如果我跟在座的同时各自写一个,人家会仔细看我的,您的没有
: 遵守这个范例就马上给删了,因为知道您不是干这行的,连起码行规都不知道。
: 试想如果grant没有significant/innovation这些硬格式,每个申请人的都千奇百怪,
: 五花八门,那审理的时候就容易被这些格式方面的东西影响,而不能focus真正有用的
: 信息。或者又沦落成看PI名气了,只能对我们更不利。
about diversity.
【在 H****y 的大作中提到】
: 我不这么看。任何行业都有它的规章制度和惯例,是为了更公平的审理。比如你要是写
: 了一本小说,要卖给agent或者publisher,你必须要按照比写grant还严格的八股来写
: 一个pitch,每一段怎么写,甚至怎么一句话描述你的书(是个多少字的什么genre的书
: ,书名要All CAPS)。如果我跟在座的同时各自写一个,人家会仔细看我的,您的没有
: 遵守这个范例就马上给删了,因为知道您不是干这行的,连起码行规都不知道。
: 试想如果grant没有significant/innovation这些硬格式,每个申请人的都千奇百怪,
: 五花八门,那审理的时候就容易被这些格式方面的东西影响,而不能focus真正有用的
: 信息。或者又沦落成看PI名气了,只能对我们更不利。
j*l
25 楼
其实烂校里也有好的本科生的. 只是很难找. 找到一个,不会比研究生差.
w*e
26 楼
虽然也许是最好选项,
八股的问题是限制思想自由发挥,
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6
【在 H****y 的大作中提到】
: 我不这么看。任何行业都有它的规章制度和惯例,是为了更公平的审理。比如你要是写
: 了一本小说,要卖给agent或者publisher,你必须要按照比写grant还严格的八股来写
: 一个pitch,每一段怎么写,甚至怎么一句话描述你的书(是个多少字的什么genre的书
: ,书名要All CAPS)。如果我跟在座的同时各自写一个,人家会仔细看我的,您的没有
: 遵守这个范例就马上给删了,因为知道您不是干这行的,连起码行规都不知道。
: 试想如果grant没有significant/innovation这些硬格式,每个申请人的都千奇百怪,
: 五花八门,那审理的时候就容易被这些格式方面的东西影响,而不能focus真正有用的
: 信息。或者又沦落成看PI名气了,只能对我们更不利。
八股的问题是限制思想自由发挥,
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6
【在 H****y 的大作中提到】
: 我不这么看。任何行业都有它的规章制度和惯例,是为了更公平的审理。比如你要是写
: 了一本小说,要卖给agent或者publisher,你必须要按照比写grant还严格的八股来写
: 一个pitch,每一段怎么写,甚至怎么一句话描述你的书(是个多少字的什么genre的书
: ,书名要All CAPS)。如果我跟在座的同时各自写一个,人家会仔细看我的,您的没有
: 遵守这个范例就马上给删了,因为知道您不是干这行的,连起码行规都不知道。
: 试想如果grant没有significant/innovation这些硬格式,每个申请人的都千奇百怪,
: 五花八门,那审理的时候就容易被这些格式方面的东西影响,而不能focus真正有用的
: 信息。或者又沦落成看PI名气了,只能对我们更不利。
l*y
30 楼
I should mention that, at least in NIH, there is very little restriction on
exactly which format you will need to use to write your proposal (except
that you need to follow the major format: Specific Aims, Significance,
Innovation etc). For example, there is no restriction on whether you should
list all your preliminary data separately or present the data along the way
when you propose the approach, whether you should discuss expected result/
pitfalls/alternative approaches separately or mix them with your other
proposed experiments. Some PIs like to use a very specific format to
organize their Specific Aim section, but others do not.
The point is, I rarely see any reviewer criticizes the format of the
proposal.
People feel the proposal is more and more like “BaGu”, mainly because the
workshops or books for grantsmanship like to recommend “BaGu” format. And
indeed, this is good for new grant writers, as this kind of format helps
reviewers to catch your point (if you do not know how to organize and
express your point through writing). However, many experienced professors do
not use this kind of format, and it is perfectly fine, as long as the
reviewers can easily understand your point.
【在 w**********e 的大作中提到】
: 虽然也许是最好选项,
: 八股的问题是限制思想自由发挥,
:
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6
exactly which format you will need to use to write your proposal (except
that you need to follow the major format: Specific Aims, Significance,
Innovation etc). For example, there is no restriction on whether you should
list all your preliminary data separately or present the data along the way
when you propose the approach, whether you should discuss expected result/
pitfalls/alternative approaches separately or mix them with your other
proposed experiments. Some PIs like to use a very specific format to
organize their Specific Aim section, but others do not.
The point is, I rarely see any reviewer criticizes the format of the
proposal.
People feel the proposal is more and more like “BaGu”, mainly because the
workshops or books for grantsmanship like to recommend “BaGu” format. And
indeed, this is good for new grant writers, as this kind of format helps
reviewers to catch your point (if you do not know how to organize and
express your point through writing). However, many experienced professors do
not use this kind of format, and it is perfectly fine, as long as the
reviewers can easily understand your point.
【在 w**********e 的大作中提到】
: 虽然也许是最好选项,
: 八股的问题是限制思想自由发挥,
:
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 8.6
j*u
35 楼
what you said might be true for established investigators, but is not
reliable for young/junior investigators.
My rule of thumb is: it should take less than 10 seconds for the
reivewers to find out what they are looking for.
format is extremely important to accomplish this goal.
on
should
way
【在 l****y 的大作中提到】
: I should mention that, at least in NIH, there is very little restriction on
: exactly which format you will need to use to write your proposal (except
: that you need to follow the major format: Specific Aims, Significance,
: Innovation etc). For example, there is no restriction on whether you should
: list all your preliminary data separately or present the data along the way
: when you propose the approach, whether you should discuss expected result/
: pitfalls/alternative approaches separately or mix them with your other
: proposed experiments. Some PIs like to use a very specific format to
: organize their Specific Aim section, but others do not.
: The point is, I rarely see any reviewer criticizes the format of the
reliable for young/junior investigators.
My rule of thumb is: it should take less than 10 seconds for the
reivewers to find out what they are looking for.
format is extremely important to accomplish this goal.
on
should
way
【在 l****y 的大作中提到】
: I should mention that, at least in NIH, there is very little restriction on
: exactly which format you will need to use to write your proposal (except
: that you need to follow the major format: Specific Aims, Significance,
: Innovation etc). For example, there is no restriction on whether you should
: list all your preliminary data separately or present the data along the way
: when you propose the approach, whether you should discuss expected result/
: pitfalls/alternative approaches separately or mix them with your other
: proposed experiments. Some PIs like to use a very specific format to
: organize their Specific Aim section, but others do not.
: The point is, I rarely see any reviewer criticizes the format of the
相关阅读
eb2-NIW的pd能否transfer到eb2-perm如何申请上诉面谈吼一声: 8月485还有没有没批的?Re: Fingerprint Done485的几个问题EB1-B如何PPEB 2, 何时寄出485【【如何支持3012以及3012的来龙去脉】】 (转载)eb1a和h1b的问题请教:关于I-94和I-797过期时间不一致弱问,485照片背后用什么笔才能写?4个月的 485 还没有批,求大家给我祝福吧,批了以后一定买包子答谢online查不到caseUSCIS收到了pp申请会不会通知申请人?[bssd] 请站内推荐一个办NIW比较好的律师(有包子)顺便问郭law有没有精算师申请niw?求教他引是中文怎么办?挂科毕业被遣返怎么办怎么回事嘛,前进了4个月没人发包子?50个包子求485翻译(part 3 C 1-18)