In the statutory language of EB1a, the United States congress requires you to show a tentative plan to work in U.S. in the area you claim extraordinary ability. Thus, it would be better to include a letter of employment. It is by no means absolute necessary since the basic presumption of employment-based immigration is that you will work in United States upon getting the green card; however, it definite helps you to show IO your intention if you can provide letter of employment or future job off
l*n
3 楼
Thank you. Actually I have a job (government agency). But I don't like to work with the HR here. I guess they may argue on this "...you must submit a letter on the letterhead of the petitioning employer which confirms that the job on which the visa petition is based is still available to you..." ( USCIS, Instruction for I-485), since they are not the "petitioning employer" .
l*5
4 楼
yes, you need. somebody got twice RFE because of the Employment Verificationm for EB1A
c*1
5 楼
Does the employment letter have to specifically specify the "PERMANENT" word? Thanks!!
【在 l******5 的大作中提到】 : yes, you need. somebody got twice RFE because of the Employment : Verificationm for EB1A
l*5
6 楼
no necessary, just regular employment verification
word?
【在 c******1 的大作中提到】 : Does the employment letter have to specifically specify the "PERMANENT" word? : Thanks!!