讨论-kazarian case对于claim的意义# Immigration - 落地生根
z*n
1 楼
去年的AAO案例
Kazarian 申请EB1a。
claim
1,publish paper
移民局说发文章必须有研究界对他的文章的反响,AAO认为规定里没有这一条,只要发
了文章就可以。移民局错了。
Kazarian’s articles did not meet the regulatory definition of evidence,
because “publication of scholarly articles is not automatically evidence of
sustained acclaim” and “we must consider the research community’s
reaction to these articles.
AAO说
The AAO’s conclusion rests on an improper understanding of 8 C.F.R. § 204.
5(h)(3)(vi). Nothing in that provision requires a petitioner to demonstrate
the research community’s reaction to his published articles before those
articles can be considered as evidence, and neither USCIS nor an AAO may
unilaterally impose novel substantive or evidentiary requirements beyond
those set forth at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5.
2, judge other‘s work
移民局同意这一条,AAO认为给大学审稿不符合规定,AAO错了。
"Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv), Kazarian submitted proof that he
was a judge of graduate-level diploma works at Yerevan State University. The
AAO held that “reviewing ‘diploma works’ for fellow students at one’s
own university is not persuasive evidence of acclaim beyond that university,
” and that absent “evidence that the petitioner served as an external
dissertation reviewer for a university with which he is not otherwise
affiliated,” Kazarian’s submission did not meet the regulatory definition
of evidence.
The AAO’s conclusion rests on an improper understanding of 8 C.F.R. § 204.
5(h)(3)(iv). Nothing in that provision suggests that whether judging
university dissertations counts as evidence turns on which university the
judge is affiliated with. Again, while the AAO’s analysis might be relevant
to a final merits determination, the AAO may not unilaterally impose a
novel evidentiary requirement. Love Korean Church, 549 F.3d at 758."
不知道这个case对于我们的申请有什么影响?
我自己的理解是,比如说award,只要是国际或者国内的奖就可以,即使带着young的字
眼,或者postdoc的字眼也没有关系。因为它规定是国际或者国内的奖。如何证明这个
奖是杰出的是另一回事??
再比如文章,只要发表了就算数,不见得必须多少引用,或者必须大于10篇(不过我想
现实情况是多多益善)。但是如果有人只有3篇文章的话,是不是也算数呢?
欢迎大家讨论。
Kazarian 申请EB1a。
claim
1,publish paper
移民局说发文章必须有研究界对他的文章的反响,AAO认为规定里没有这一条,只要发
了文章就可以。移民局错了。
Kazarian’s articles did not meet the regulatory definition of evidence,
because “publication of scholarly articles is not automatically evidence of
sustained acclaim” and “we must consider the research community’s
reaction to these articles.
AAO说
The AAO’s conclusion rests on an improper understanding of 8 C.F.R. § 204.
5(h)(3)(vi). Nothing in that provision requires a petitioner to demonstrate
the research community’s reaction to his published articles before those
articles can be considered as evidence, and neither USCIS nor an AAO may
unilaterally impose novel substantive or evidentiary requirements beyond
those set forth at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5.
2, judge other‘s work
移民局同意这一条,AAO认为给大学审稿不符合规定,AAO错了。
"Pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(iv), Kazarian submitted proof that he
was a judge of graduate-level diploma works at Yerevan State University. The
AAO held that “reviewing ‘diploma works’ for fellow students at one’s
own university is not persuasive evidence of acclaim beyond that university,
” and that absent “evidence that the petitioner served as an external
dissertation reviewer for a university with which he is not otherwise
affiliated,” Kazarian’s submission did not meet the regulatory definition
of evidence.
The AAO’s conclusion rests on an improper understanding of 8 C.F.R. § 204.
5(h)(3)(iv). Nothing in that provision suggests that whether judging
university dissertations counts as evidence turns on which university the
judge is affiliated with. Again, while the AAO’s analysis might be relevant
to a final merits determination, the AAO may not unilaterally impose a
novel evidentiary requirement. Love Korean Church, 549 F.3d at 758."
不知道这个case对于我们的申请有什么影响?
我自己的理解是,比如说award,只要是国际或者国内的奖就可以,即使带着young的字
眼,或者postdoc的字眼也没有关系。因为它规定是国际或者国内的奖。如何证明这个
奖是杰出的是另一回事??
再比如文章,只要发表了就算数,不见得必须多少引用,或者必须大于10篇(不过我想
现实情况是多多益善)。但是如果有人只有3篇文章的话,是不是也算数呢?
欢迎大家讨论。