t*t
2 楼
Background:
2008 US PhD from 3rd tier U. Now Research faculty in a 4th tier U.
Papers (2008-present): 9 (2 reviews, 5 1st author, 3 corresponding author),
1 submitted, 1 coauthor under review. All top journals in my field.
Only 24 citations (mostly self-citation; most citations are within US)
Oral presentations: 2
Abstracts: 11
Review: 3 journals (top in my field), 21 times; committee member of a Ph.D.
student.
PI of a small grant. However, half of the awardees are from outside the U.S.
Also, one Nobel Laureate was an awardee and is now on their committee.
1. Shall I claim two or three criteria (publication, review , contribution) ?
2. If claim two, which is better, Publication+Review or Contribution+Review?
If claim contribution, my citation record is too weak but the grant awardee
distribution and that Nobel Laureate are bonus.
Any input will be appreciated!
2008 US PhD from 3rd tier U. Now Research faculty in a 4th tier U.
Papers (2008-present): 9 (2 reviews, 5 1st author, 3 corresponding author),
1 submitted, 1 coauthor under review. All top journals in my field.
Only 24 citations (mostly self-citation; most citations are within US)
Oral presentations: 2
Abstracts: 11
Review: 3 journals (top in my field), 21 times; committee member of a Ph.D.
student.
PI of a small grant. However, half of the awardees are from outside the U.S.
Also, one Nobel Laureate was an awardee and is now on their committee.
1. Shall I claim two or three criteria (publication, review , contribution) ?
2. If claim two, which is better, Publication+Review or Contribution+Review?
If claim contribution, my citation record is too weak but the grant awardee
distribution and that Nobel Laureate are bonus.
Any input will be appreciated!
f*9
3 楼
It looks good.
C*y
4 楼
Claim 3
Contribution is a must
,
.
S.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Background:
: 2008 US PhD from 3rd tier U. Now Research faculty in a 4th tier U.
: Papers (2008-present): 9 (2 reviews, 5 1st author, 3 corresponding author),
: 1 submitted, 1 coauthor under review. All top journals in my field.
: Only 24 citations (mostly self-citation; most citations are within US)
: Oral presentations: 2
: Abstracts: 11
: Review: 3 journals (top in my field), 21 times; committee member of a Ph.D.
: student.
: PI of a small grant. However, half of the awardees are from outside the U.S.
Contribution is a must
,
.
S.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Background:
: 2008 US PhD from 3rd tier U. Now Research faculty in a 4th tier U.
: Papers (2008-present): 9 (2 reviews, 5 1st author, 3 corresponding author),
: 1 submitted, 1 coauthor under review. All top journals in my field.
: Only 24 citations (mostly self-citation; most citations are within US)
: Oral presentations: 2
: Abstracts: 11
: Review: 3 journals (top in my field), 21 times; committee member of a Ph.D.
: student.
: PI of a small grant. However, half of the awardees are from outside the U.S.
c*d
7 楼
我有这张卡。我个人认为不咋样,只不过是第一张卡就一直没关
T*y
8 楼
Because contribution is almost as totality.
Now the IOs check the individual claims on face value first, and then
evaluate the totality. You may pass all the individual claims, but the
totality is still not satisfied.
Totality is like the overall impression whether your work is internationally
influential.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Why contribution is a must? Thanks!
Now the IOs check the individual claims on face value first, and then
evaluate the totality. You may pass all the individual claims, but the
totality is still not satisfied.
Totality is like the overall impression whether your work is internationally
influential.
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Why contribution is a must? Thanks!
n*e
9 楼
have it for 9 month already
s*g
11 楼
无数人有这张卡吧
这张卡当时还是很神的
现在缩水了 但也还行吧
主要的问题是如果自己信用资料不够强 还是别乱试
不少人被降级批卡 拿了鸡肋卡不知道怎么办
这张卡当时还是很神的
现在缩水了 但也还行吧
主要的问题是如果自己信用资料不够强 还是别乱试
不少人被降级批卡 拿了鸡肋卡不知道怎么办
a*n
12 楼
正解
internationally
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Because contribution is almost as totality.
: Now the IOs check the individual claims on face value first, and then
: evaluate the totality. You may pass all the individual claims, but the
: totality is still not satisfied.
: Totality is like the overall impression whether your work is internationally
: influential.
internationally
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: Because contribution is almost as totality.
: Now the IOs check the individual claims on face value first, and then
: evaluate the totality. You may pass all the individual claims, but the
: totality is still not satisfied.
: Totality is like the overall impression whether your work is internationally
: influential.
相关阅读
有同学想审稿吗?现有几篇国际通信联盟的会议稿ITU Kaleidoscope 2015求推荐靠谱速度快的NIW律师生物EB1A求评估指点NSC LD 485 RFE后绿了拿到卡了,总结一下timeline TSC EB1A PP CC【急问】我提交了140,我的配偶还能申请B1/B2 visa吗?!中央电视台13报道算不算媒体报道485 求祝福!转审稿 Epidemiology/Mathematical ModelingTSC Eb1a non-PP一般要等多久才有消息啊?想了解下版内有没有J waiver只拿到FR就递485的朋友tsc eb1a 140 RFE回复一个多月,还没有消息,求祝福递交I485后,才发现自己忘记了邮寄旧护照的签证文件,请问怎么办?最近提交I485申请材料是不是不用交I94了?真心求教,各位怎么要求做SR的??1月份RDForm I-797A Notice of Action, Approval Notice for Change nonimmigrant Status(gone) 转review invitation有人需要数学/图论方向的paper review吗?生物弱Case EB1A FRE后过,中间申请O1 cover gap主申请终于绿了 TSC 485 RD 01/12/2015 Approved 07/24/2015