g*M
2 楼
只需claim 两项,为什么大家都要上contribution? 不可以只申请authorship 和
review 吗? Contribution 容易招惹REF的说?
review 吗? Contribution 容易招惹REF的说?
T*y
4 楼
In the current two step evaluation standard, the IOs first evaluate
whether the claims meet the face value of the requirements, such as the
numbers of publications, citations, etc; then the IOs evaluate whether
the case is strong enough overall, or whether the case gives them enough
impression that this applicant is indeed extraordinary or outstanding.
The second step is called totality evaluation.
The approval of a case requires both face value satisfaction and
totality satisfaction.
The totality evaluation is somewhat very similar to contribution
evaluation, namely, unless the contribution requirement is met, the
totality won't be met. In the extreme case though, I saw maybe only one
case on this board that an applicant met all 3 claims including
contribution on the face value, but his totality was not met, and his
case was RFEed or something. In the common cases, contribution is most
often questioned in RFEs.
So contribution is the most important thing to be claimed and supported
for both EB1A and EB1B.
【在 g**M 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 只需claim 两项,为什么大家都要上contribution? 不可以只申请authorship 和
: review 吗? Contribution 容易招惹REF的说?
whether the claims meet the face value of the requirements, such as the
numbers of publications, citations, etc; then the IOs evaluate whether
the case is strong enough overall, or whether the case gives them enough
impression that this applicant is indeed extraordinary or outstanding.
The second step is called totality evaluation.
The approval of a case requires both face value satisfaction and
totality satisfaction.
The totality evaluation is somewhat very similar to contribution
evaluation, namely, unless the contribution requirement is met, the
totality won't be met. In the extreme case though, I saw maybe only one
case on this board that an applicant met all 3 claims including
contribution on the face value, but his totality was not met, and his
case was RFEed or something. In the common cases, contribution is most
often questioned in RFEs.
So contribution is the most important thing to be claimed and supported
for both EB1A and EB1B.
【在 g**M 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 只需claim 两项,为什么大家都要上contribution? 不可以只申请authorship 和
: review 吗? Contribution 容易招惹REF的说?
g*x
6 楼
eb1b是只需要满足两条就够了,但是两条都需要达到两步法totality的要求,那就是申
请者要被 Internationally recogized as an OUTSTANDING researcher。
一个是internationallly recognized, 一个是outstanding.要证明这两点如果不说你
做了什么贡献,比较难说通怎么outstanding, 能internationally recognized,所以功
课总要做的,而且这样写逻辑比较通顺。
当然你要是有足够强的证据支持着两条,我觉得也是可以的。
请者要被 Internationally recogized as an OUTSTANDING researcher。
一个是internationallly recognized, 一个是outstanding.要证明这两点如果不说你
做了什么贡献,比较难说通怎么outstanding, 能internationally recognized,所以功
课总要做的,而且这样写逻辑比较通顺。
当然你要是有足够强的证据支持着两条,我觉得也是可以的。
相关阅读
雇主可以撤销已经批准的I140吗?TSC EB1A RFE回复后求bless已结束- 审稿机会: peptide-based siRNA deliveryTSC 485 现在平均需要多长时间?NSC 485 一天能审多少个?Eb1A审稿需要多少文章TSC报绿TSC Outside Normal Processing Times email response加州驾照更新和绿卡背景调查的关系杂志IF不足4的律师说不用提审稿推荐:pH responsive hydrogel, polymer material【I-485哭求指点!】老婆TB检查呈阳性,医生说Talent TB圈了Cl“就是邀请你投稿的垃圾邮件”求审稿机会TSC EB1B no-pp approved能帮忙作一道单选题吗?请教一个问题:如何claim贡献转审稿!(Gone)review机会,journal of hospital infection(gone)NSC 485 RFE求解