普通家长不是更应该关心吗?作父母的不会不关心孩子在学校要学的东西,要考试的标 准的大变化吧? 而且,老师和专业人士应该也会听家长的声音啊。 贴一篇高中英语老师对 common core 的实施体会。 Teacher: One (maddening) day working with the Common Core By Valerie Strauss http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/teacher-o 很想听人说说或转帖对 common core 的赞扬和正面经验。
【在 a*****g 的大作中提到】 : 前几天刚刚有个报告,说大部分人不知道 common core : 其实这些东西是给老师和教育专业人士看的,不是给普通家长看的,还谈神马利弊啊。
先给你说个笑话—— 20年前家长看到成绩单是不及格,就对孩子说“What's the problem with you?" 现在的家长看到成绩单是不及格,就对老师说“What's the problem with you?" 听家长的声音?说起来容易啊。 对于教学大纲之类的,很多家长不会关心那么多的(不要以为家长都是博士硕士的) 偶尔有些关心的,也就是大致看看自己孩子几年级,看看那个年级学什么东西, 也不会去深入研究大纲的,更谈不上去议论好坏。
【在 J*******p 的大作中提到】 : : 普通家长不是更应该关心吗?作父母的不会不关心孩子在学校要学的东西,要考试的标 : 准的大变化吧? : 而且,老师和专业人士应该也会听家长的声音啊。 : 贴一篇高中英语老师对 common core 的实施体会。 : Teacher: One (maddening) day working with the Common Core : By Valerie Strauss : http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/teacher-o : 很想听人说说或转帖对 common core 的赞扬和正面经验。
【在 a*****g 的大作中提到】 : 先给你说个笑话—— : 20年前家长看到成绩单是不及格,就对孩子说“What's the problem with you?" : 现在的家长看到成绩单是不及格,就对老师说“What's the problem with you?" : 听家长的声音?说起来容易啊。 : 对于教学大纲之类的,很多家长不会关心那么多的(不要以为家长都是博士硕士的) : 偶尔有些关心的,也就是大致看看自己孩子几年级,看看那个年级学什么东西, : 也不会去深入研究大纲的,更谈不上去议论好坏。
【在 IV 的大作中提到】 : 那篇review是引用你的一作文章吗?如果是共同作者,IO会不会就此有质疑?
D*e
64 楼
Very good articles, 大蜜蜂. I just want to share some information from my denial notice, so people can foresee what may happen. The I.O. actually said publishing papers, attending conferences are original research, or original presentations, not "original contribution". And he thinks original contribution means a higher standard. My lawyer thinks the I.O. used the standard for EB1-A to judge my case. What do you guys think?
To transform from original research to original contribution, I think, we need prove those original research and presentations help other researchers, drive the whole field and find applications, corresponding to citations, media reports and awards.
said original What
【在 D**********e 的大作中提到】 : Very good articles, 大蜜蜂. I just want to share some information from my : denial notice, so people can foresee what may happen. The I.O. actually said : publishing papers, attending conferences are original research, or original : presentations, not "original contribution". And he thinks original : contribution means a higher standard. : My lawyer thinks the I.O. used the standard for EB1-A to judge my case. What : do you guys think? : : ignore
b*e
66 楼
agree,确实是很好的补充,这也是我为什么这么加强第一篇RFE推荐信的缘故。
researchers,
【在 IV 的大作中提到】 : To transform from original research to original contribution, I think, we : need prove those original research and presentations help other researchers, : drive the whole field and find applications, corresponding to citations, : media reports and awards. : : said : original : What
b*e
67 楼
多谢哥们你愿意share啊。 其实这里面是有个逻辑的,如IV所说, 你首先得有original publication,然后用来说明的是original contribution。我把每 个会议还有论文首页的介绍打下来,基本上他们的用词都是original and outstanding research topics blabla. 因此我才在第一篇RFE里面延展了这一说明。这个延展就写 了三段话。 其他的用来陈述international and contribution. 我后面写完:)
said original What
【在 D**********e 的大作中提到】 : Very good articles, 大蜜蜂. I just want to share some information from my : denial notice, so people can foresee what may happen. The I.O. actually said : publishing papers, attending conferences are original research, or original : presentations, not "original contribution". And he thinks original : contribution means a higher standard. : My lawyer thinks the I.O. used the standard for EB1-A to judge my case. What : do you guys think? : : ignore
f*l
68 楼
你这提醒可实在是深刻!我一直以为是original research,所以反复强调published for first time;原来应该是 "original contribution",书没读透,看来当时AAO案例 是白看了。
said original What
【在 D**********e 的大作中提到】 : Very good articles, 大蜜蜂. I just want to share some information from my : denial notice, so people can foresee what may happen. The I.O. actually said : publishing papers, attending conferences are original research, or original : presentations, not "original contribution". And he thinks original : contribution means a higher standard. : My lawyer thinks the I.O. used the standard for EB1-A to judge my case. What : do you guys think? : : ignore
D*e
69 楼
No problem. I think we should all share the stupid denial reasons so that everybody will learn from previous lessons.
【在 f*******l 的大作中提到】 : 你这提醒可实在是深刻!我一直以为是original research,所以反复强调published : for first time;原来应该是 "original contribution",书没读透,看来当时AAO案例 : 是白看了。 : : said : original : What
b*r
70 楼
good point. Sometimes the IO sucks.【 在 Danceforlife (extreme) 的大作中提到
b*e
71 楼
要是同学们都能这么想,很快IO就会被秒杀咯!:)
【在 D**********e 的大作中提到】 : No problem. I think we should all share the stupid denial reasons so that : everybody will learn from previous lessons.
d*1
72 楼
如何请求? 写 I beg you for a reference letter? Or request for a reference letter? or asking for a reference letter? Thank you~!
b*e
73 楼
版上这个topic的讨论很完整,你标题搜一下就行了。
【在 d****1 的大作中提到】 : 如何请求? : 写 I beg you for a reference letter? : Or request for a reference letter? : or asking for a reference letter? : Thank you~!
【在 IV 的大作中提到】 : 那篇review是引用你的一作文章吗?如果是共同作者,IO会不会就此有质疑?
D*e
104 楼
Very good articles, 大蜜蜂. I just want to share some information from my denial notice, so people can foresee what may happen. The I.O. actually said publishing papers, attending conferences are original research, or original presentations, not "original contribution". And he thinks original contribution means a higher standard. My lawyer thinks the I.O. used the standard for EB1-A to judge my case. What do you guys think?
To transform from original research to original contribution, I think, we need prove those original research and presentations help other researchers, drive the whole field and find applications, corresponding to citations, media reports and awards.
said original What
【在 D**********e 的大作中提到】 : Very good articles, 大蜜蜂. I just want to share some information from my : denial notice, so people can foresee what may happen. The I.O. actually said : publishing papers, attending conferences are original research, or original : presentations, not "original contribution". And he thinks original : contribution means a higher standard. : My lawyer thinks the I.O. used the standard for EB1-A to judge my case. What : do you guys think? : : ignore
b*e
106 楼
agree,确实是很好的补充,这也是我为什么这么加强第一篇RFE推荐信的缘故。
researchers,
【在 IV 的大作中提到】 : To transform from original research to original contribution, I think, we : need prove those original research and presentations help other researchers, : drive the whole field and find applications, corresponding to citations, : media reports and awards. : : said : original : What
b*e
107 楼
多谢哥们你愿意share啊。 其实这里面是有个逻辑的,如IV所说, 你首先得有original publication,然后用来说明的是original contribution。我把每 个会议还有论文首页的介绍打下来,基本上他们的用词都是original and outstanding research topics blabla. 因此我才在第一篇RFE里面延展了这一说明。这个延展就写 了三段话。 其他的用来陈述international and contribution. 我后面写完:)
said original What
【在 D**********e 的大作中提到】 : Very good articles, 大蜜蜂. I just want to share some information from my : denial notice, so people can foresee what may happen. The I.O. actually said : publishing papers, attending conferences are original research, or original : presentations, not "original contribution". And he thinks original : contribution means a higher standard. : My lawyer thinks the I.O. used the standard for EB1-A to judge my case. What : do you guys think? : : ignore
f*l
108 楼
你这提醒可实在是深刻!我一直以为是original research,所以反复强调published for first time;原来应该是 "original contribution",书没读透,看来当时AAO案例 是白看了。
said original What
【在 D**********e 的大作中提到】 : Very good articles, 大蜜蜂. I just want to share some information from my : denial notice, so people can foresee what may happen. The I.O. actually said : publishing papers, attending conferences are original research, or original : presentations, not "original contribution". And he thinks original : contribution means a higher standard. : My lawyer thinks the I.O. used the standard for EB1-A to judge my case. What : do you guys think? : : ignore
D*e
109 楼
No problem. I think we should all share the stupid denial reasons so that everybody will learn from previous lessons.
【在 f*******l 的大作中提到】 : 你这提醒可实在是深刻!我一直以为是original research,所以反复强调published : for first time;原来应该是 "original contribution",书没读透,看来当时AAO案例 : 是白看了。 : : said : original : What
b*r
110 楼
good point. Sometimes the IO sucks.【 在 Danceforlife (extreme) 的大作中提到
b*e
111 楼
要是同学们都能这么想,很快IO就会被秒杀咯!:)
【在 D**********e 的大作中提到】 : No problem. I think we should all share the stupid denial reasons so that : everybody will learn from previous lessons.
d*1
112 楼
如何请求? 写 I beg you for a reference letter? Or request for a reference letter? or asking for a reference letter? Thank you~!
b*e
113 楼
版上这个topic的讨论很完整,你标题搜一下就行了。
【在 d****1 的大作中提到】 : 如何请求? : 写 I beg you for a reference letter? : Or request for a reference letter? : or asking for a reference letter? : Thank you~!