z*u
2 楼
感兴趣的朋友站内联系
c*u
3 楼
女宝快两岁了,喜欢看youtube上的拉小提琴(《梁祝》),昨天还会说“我想拉琴”
了。在想要不要买给玩具的给她玩玩,但又担心以后要是真学琴,现在玩会影响(比如
姿势等)。
想请各位高人指教一下。谢谢!
了。在想要不要买给玩具的给她玩玩,但又担心以后要是真学琴,现在玩会影响(比如
姿势等)。
想请各位高人指教一下。谢谢!
x*l
4 楼
不好意思,我把我的基本情况综合了一下再在这里发一次,希望各位大侠帮我诊断一下看
看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized
prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor, because they are
generally given to students or career professionals in the field. In
addition these teaching awards were limited to the university you worked at
and is not considered national or international awards. If the petitioner
believes the prizes or awards are nationally or internationally recognized
prizes or awards for excellence in the field, the petitioner may submit:…
Documentation of membership in associations in the field for which
classification is sought, which require outstanding achievements of their
members, as judged by recognized national or international experts in their
disciplines or fields.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not shown that the
basis for granting memberships in the submitted associations was that your
outstanding achievements in the field of endeavor as judged by recognized
national or international experts in the field. It has been established that
outstandingachievements are required to become a member of the above
associations. To assist in determining that your memberships satisfy this
criterion, the petitioner may submit:
. Information to establish that the individuals who review propective
members’ applications are recognized as national or international experts
in their disciplines or fields: and
. The section of the association’s constitution or bylaws which discuss the
qualifications required of the reviews on the review panel of the
association.
Published material about you in professional or major trade publications or
major media, relating to your work in the field for which claasification is
sought. Such evidence shall include the title, date, and author of the
material, and any necessary translation.
This carterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicate that
the published material was published in professional or major trade
publications or other major media. Having ones work cited in various
journals does not meet this criterion, since the material is not primarily
about the petitioner’s work but rather a reference to their work. To assist
in determining that the publications qualify as professional or major trade
publications or other major media, the petitioner may submit:
.Submit evidence there are articals that are primarily about the beneficiary
’s work that was discussed in professional or major trade publications or
other major media.
.Documentary evidence including:
. The title, date, and author of the published material;
. The circulation (online and/or in print); and
. The intened audience of the publication.
Notes:
. Additional published material should be dated prior to the date of
submission of this Form I-140
. The published material should be about the beneficiary’s work in the
field, not just about the beneficiary’s employer or other organizations the
beneficiary’s is associated with:
. Marketing materials created for the purpose of seiling the beneficiary’s
products or promoting the beneficiary’s services are not generally
considered to be published material about the beneficiary;
And
. Unevaluated listings in a subject matter index or footnote, or reference
to the beneficiary’s work without evaluation are insufficient.
Evidence of your participation, either individually or on a panel, as a
judge of the work of others in the same or allied field.
You have claimed to have been invited to review manuscripts for the….
You have indicated you have review for various journals; however, there is
no evidence to establish that the beneficiary actually participated in these
reviews. Plese provide evidence that establishes that the beneficiary
actually participated in the judging of the work of others for which they
were invited.
.Submit the emails from all the journals you have claimed to have been
invited to review for in confirming you have actually performed those
manuscript reviews, and not just simply invited.
Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or business-
related contributions of major significance in your field.
The criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that your contributions are considered to be of major significance to the
field of endeavor. Many of the letters of support were from individuals who
already knew you, and the letters of support were general in nature, and did
not establish your accomplishments are any greater than your peers. USCIS
does not find the totality of your work has risen to a major significance
within your field. Given your low publication rate, and low citation record
it has not been established your work has made a major significant impact
within your field. Having published your work in various journals, and
writing a book is inherent to the position in which you serve in, and based
on the evidence your work has not made a major significant inpact. To assist
in determing whether of your contributions are original and of major
siginificance, you may submit:
. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution to
the field.
. Evidence of your work being implemented by others. Possible evidence may
include but is not limited to:
. Contracts with companies using of your products;
. Licensed technology being used by others;
. Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the
field.
. Any other relevant evidence.
Evidence of your authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in
professional or major trade publications or other major media
This criterion has been met.
Evidence you have performed in a leading or critical role for organizations
or establishments that have a distinguished reputation.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicate that
you have performed in a leading or critical role. The position and duties
you have performed are inherent to the position Post-doctoral fellows, and
assistant professor, Post-doctoral fellows and assistant professor across
the country hold positions such as this; therefore it is not enough to claim
this is a leading or critical role by virture of holding the positions.
Performing complex research and instructing students is inherent to all post
-doctoral fellows, and assistant professors, and is not considered a leading
or critical role. To assist in determining that you have performed in a
leading or critical role for you may submit:ocumentary evidence to
demonstrate how your role was/is leading or critical for the origanizations
or establishments.
. It is not the title of your role. But rather your performance in the role
that determines whether the role id leading or critical. As such, include
details regarding ehy your performance in the role was leading or critical.
. Documentary evidence to establish that you have been a leader or has
somehow contributed in a way that is of significant importance to the
outcome of the organizations or establishments activities.
. Documentary evidence to demonstrate how your performance is or was leading
or critical compared to others employed in similar pursuits within the
field endeavor.
Details beyond generalities are required, such as the specific tasks or
accomplishments of you as compared to others who participated in the field
of endeavor.
. Any other relevant evidence.
目前10条只满足了一条,如果当时把审稿后人家回复我的邮件附上了,估计会满足2条,
我大致情况是这样的:1)某部委科技进步三等奖参与人,某高校优秀教学奖三次
2)审稿4个杂志7次
3)外文文章5篇,其中一作2篇,中文文章11篇,其中一作10篇,国际会
议文章24篇,其中一作7篇。参编书3本,都不是一作,翻译出版书2本,也不是一作。
4)我是生物医学工程方面的土鳖,我文章的影响因子有一篇一作是5吧,文章引用不多啊
,外文的18次,中文的35次吧.
5)5个推荐信,我老板,我们所长,三个独立推荐人,一个美国的华人,一个英国的,一
个芬兰的。
看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized
prizes or awards for excellence in the field of endeavor, because they are
generally given to students or career professionals in the field. In
addition these teaching awards were limited to the university you worked at
and is not considered national or international awards. If the petitioner
believes the prizes or awards are nationally or internationally recognized
prizes or awards for excellence in the field, the petitioner may submit:…
Documentation of membership in associations in the field for which
classification is sought, which require outstanding achievements of their
members, as judged by recognized national or international experts in their
disciplines or fields.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not shown that the
basis for granting memberships in the submitted associations was that your
outstanding achievements in the field of endeavor as judged by recognized
national or international experts in the field. It has been established that
outstandingachievements are required to become a member of the above
associations. To assist in determining that your memberships satisfy this
criterion, the petitioner may submit:
. Information to establish that the individuals who review propective
members’ applications are recognized as national or international experts
in their disciplines or fields: and
. The section of the association’s constitution or bylaws which discuss the
qualifications required of the reviews on the review panel of the
association.
Published material about you in professional or major trade publications or
major media, relating to your work in the field for which claasification is
sought. Such evidence shall include the title, date, and author of the
material, and any necessary translation.
This carterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicate that
the published material was published in professional or major trade
publications or other major media. Having ones work cited in various
journals does not meet this criterion, since the material is not primarily
about the petitioner’s work but rather a reference to their work. To assist
in determining that the publications qualify as professional or major trade
publications or other major media, the petitioner may submit:
.Submit evidence there are articals that are primarily about the beneficiary
’s work that was discussed in professional or major trade publications or
other major media.
.Documentary evidence including:
. The title, date, and author of the published material;
. The circulation (online and/or in print); and
. The intened audience of the publication.
Notes:
. Additional published material should be dated prior to the date of
submission of this Form I-140
. The published material should be about the beneficiary’s work in the
field, not just about the beneficiary’s employer or other organizations the
beneficiary’s is associated with:
. Marketing materials created for the purpose of seiling the beneficiary’s
products or promoting the beneficiary’s services are not generally
considered to be published material about the beneficiary;
And
. Unevaluated listings in a subject matter index or footnote, or reference
to the beneficiary’s work without evaluation are insufficient.
Evidence of your participation, either individually or on a panel, as a
judge of the work of others in the same or allied field.
You have claimed to have been invited to review manuscripts for the….
You have indicated you have review for various journals; however, there is
no evidence to establish that the beneficiary actually participated in these
reviews. Plese provide evidence that establishes that the beneficiary
actually participated in the judging of the work of others for which they
were invited.
.Submit the emails from all the journals you have claimed to have been
invited to review for in confirming you have actually performed those
manuscript reviews, and not just simply invited.
Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly, artistic, or business-
related contributions of major significance in your field.
The criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that your contributions are considered to be of major significance to the
field of endeavor. Many of the letters of support were from individuals who
already knew you, and the letters of support were general in nature, and did
not establish your accomplishments are any greater than your peers. USCIS
does not find the totality of your work has risen to a major significance
within your field. Given your low publication rate, and low citation record
it has not been established your work has made a major significant impact
within your field. Having published your work in various journals, and
writing a book is inherent to the position in which you serve in, and based
on the evidence your work has not made a major significant inpact. To assist
in determing whether of your contributions are original and of major
siginificance, you may submit:
. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your contribution to
the field.
. Evidence of your work being implemented by others. Possible evidence may
include but is not limited to:
. Contracts with companies using of your products;
. Licensed technology being used by others;
. Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the
field.
. Any other relevant evidence.
Evidence of your authorship of scholarly articles in the field, in
professional or major trade publications or other major media
This criterion has been met.
Evidence you have performed in a leading or critical role for organizations
or establishments that have a distinguished reputation.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicate that
you have performed in a leading or critical role. The position and duties
you have performed are inherent to the position Post-doctoral fellows, and
assistant professor, Post-doctoral fellows and assistant professor across
the country hold positions such as this; therefore it is not enough to claim
this is a leading or critical role by virture of holding the positions.
Performing complex research and instructing students is inherent to all post
-doctoral fellows, and assistant professors, and is not considered a leading
or critical role. To assist in determining that you have performed in a
leading or critical role for you may submit:ocumentary evidence to
demonstrate how your role was/is leading or critical for the origanizations
or establishments.
. It is not the title of your role. But rather your performance in the role
that determines whether the role id leading or critical. As such, include
details regarding ehy your performance in the role was leading or critical.
. Documentary evidence to establish that you have been a leader or has
somehow contributed in a way that is of significant importance to the
outcome of the organizations or establishments activities.
. Documentary evidence to demonstrate how your performance is or was leading
or critical compared to others employed in similar pursuits within the
field endeavor.
Details beyond generalities are required, such as the specific tasks or
accomplishments of you as compared to others who participated in the field
of endeavor.
. Any other relevant evidence.
目前10条只满足了一条,如果当时把审稿后人家回复我的邮件附上了,估计会满足2条,
我大致情况是这样的:1)某部委科技进步三等奖参与人,某高校优秀教学奖三次
2)审稿4个杂志7次
3)外文文章5篇,其中一作2篇,中文文章11篇,其中一作10篇,国际会
议文章24篇,其中一作7篇。参编书3本,都不是一作,翻译出版书2本,也不是一作。
4)我是生物医学工程方面的土鳖,我文章的影响因子有一篇一作是5吧,文章引用不多啊
,外文的18次,中文的35次吧.
5)5个推荐信,我老板,我们所长,三个独立推荐人,一个美国的华人,一个英国的,一
个芬兰的。
c*a
5 楼
不用给小费,应该管水,饭吗,叫两个皮萨没多少钱,也可以管
H*M
6 楼
我是新PhD,非牛校,想试下Software Engineer的职位,可以帮忙吗?
k*m
7 楼
玩吧,不会影响
P*F
8 楼
claimed too many items. DIY?
c*t
10 楼
楼主好人!
已发站内信
已发站内信
c*u
11 楼
谢谢!想问什么时候开始正式学小提琴比较好?
i*N
12 楼
For EB1a, you likely need more reviews and more citations. Publications and
awards in China are nice to have, but it will be better if you also have
strong publications and awards in USA.
【在 x**l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 不好意思,我把我的基本情况综合了一下再在这里发一次,希望各位大侠帮我诊断一下看
: 看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
: Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
: prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
: The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
: that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
: 3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
: or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
: not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
: awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized
awards in China are nice to have, but it will be better if you also have
strong publications and awards in USA.
【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 不好意思,我把我的基本情况综合了一下再在这里发一次,希望各位大侠帮我诊断一下看
: 看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
: Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
: prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
: The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
: that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
: 3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
: or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
: not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
: awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized
n*p
13 楼
twitter jobs:
http://jobguiding.com/social-networking/twitter.html
http://jobguiding.com/social-networking/twitter.html
b*e
15 楼
你的整个package基本上所有的材料都要重新来过。那种teaching award是没有任何意
义的award,不要提交,现在是你挖了个坑,自己都挺难爬出来的。 你的推荐信也肯定
很笼统的东西( general in nature) ,需要重写,重改。你可以先在这里做些research
,然后再决定你是否请律师啊,如何改材料什么的。 你还有87天,别急着递交。耐心,
仔细,沉着,严谨才能成功。
【在 x**l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 不好意思,我把我的基本情况综合了一下再在这里发一次,希望各位大侠帮我诊断一下看
: 看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
: Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
: prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
: The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
: that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
: 3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
: or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
: not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
: awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized
义的award,不要提交,现在是你挖了个坑,自己都挺难爬出来的。 你的推荐信也肯定
很笼统的东西( general in nature) ,需要重写,重改。你可以先在这里做些research
,然后再决定你是否请律师啊,如何改材料什么的。 你还有87天,别急着递交。耐心,
仔细,沉着,严谨才能成功。
【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 不好意思,我把我的基本情况综合了一下再在这里发一次,希望各位大侠帮我诊断一下看
: 看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
: Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
: prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
: The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
: that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
: 3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
: or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
: not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
: awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized
z*u
16 楼
感兴趣的朋友站内联系
i*t
18 楼
是啊 要写 通俗易懂的details,言之有物
H*M
19 楼
我是新PhD,非牛校,想试下Software Engineer的职位,可以帮忙吗?
M*s
20 楼
不必在意
x*l
21 楼
推荐信重写根本来不及啊,当时搞那几封推荐信从发给人家到人家给我费了3个月时间啊
.我现在只有70天的时间了.我其实找人帮我搞的啊.NIW和EB1同时搞的.NIW的140顺利的
过关了,EB1给卡在这里了.
.我现在只有70天的时间了.我其实找人帮我搞的啊.NIW和EB1同时搞的.NIW的140顺利的
过关了,EB1给卡在这里了.
c*t
22 楼
楼主好人!
已发站内信
已发站内信
n*p
25 楼
twitter jobs:
http://jobguiding.com/social-networking/twitter.html
http://jobguiding.com/social-networking/twitter.html
w*e
26 楼
2岁觉得真的太小了吧?我女儿快5岁开始学,老师还要先看看才收的。同意上边建议,
先上上亲子音乐课再说。
先上上亲子音乐课再说。
j*l
27 楼
我觉得lz diy 的时候并没有在版上好好考古。
一般大家都知道,10项里面只要claim 三项就好了,而不是每一项都提。
不强的都不提。
一般大家都知道,10项里面只要claim 三项就好了,而不是每一项都提。
不强的都不提。
c*u
29 楼
谢谢!会去music together看看!
m*z
30 楼
lz的review和citation这两个硬指标都不够。1a的话review怎么也得30+,citation
100+,否则就是运气了。
100+,否则就是运气了。
j*i
31 楼
楼主,
已站内发信.
谢谢您的帮助。
已站内发信.
谢谢您的帮助。
i*t
32 楼
小提琴不好玩,还是弄个电子琴先玩吧
x*l
33 楼
我是找律师帮我办的啊.我是找律师帮我办的啊 老板今天决定把我的title由postdoc改
成research scientist. 估计没什么用了吧?
成research scientist. 估计没什么用了吧?
r*c
37 楼
可惜在三番,什么时候扩招sunnyvale site啊
l*a
38 楼
其实小提琴大点学,还学的挺快的。
对于小的,Suzuki很好,要想基本功练的好,Suzuki不够。
半年前,我们在Suzuki第二本的时候,上了wolf heart,60,
现在已经完成了40首 study。Suzuki第三册两个月拉完。
现在在拉第四册,也快完了。
老师说,我们拉的wolf heart的练习比Suzuki第五册的都难。
对小小孩,学乐理不容易,Suzuki是美国孩子喜欢的,
美国小孩太受宠了,只上Suzuki是不行的。
我们孩子11岁,理解能力比较强,老师要求比较严格。
小小孩拉歌还是有趣的,但是要掌握,就要基本功,
要拉一些练习,要提高技巧,要乐理跟上。
【在 w********e 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 2岁觉得真的太小了吧?我女儿快5岁开始学,老师还要先看看才收的。同意上边建议,
: 先上上亲子音乐课再说。
对于小的,Suzuki很好,要想基本功练的好,Suzuki不够。
半年前,我们在Suzuki第二本的时候,上了wolf heart,60,
现在已经完成了40首 study。Suzuki第三册两个月拉完。
现在在拉第四册,也快完了。
老师说,我们拉的wolf heart的练习比Suzuki第五册的都难。
对小小孩,学乐理不容易,Suzuki是美国孩子喜欢的,
美国小孩太受宠了,只上Suzuki是不行的。
我们孩子11岁,理解能力比较强,老师要求比较严格。
小小孩拉歌还是有趣的,但是要掌握,就要基本功,
要拉一些练习,要提高技巧,要乐理跟上。
【在 w********e 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 2岁觉得真的太小了吧?我女儿快5岁开始学,老师还要先看看才收的。同意上边建议,
: 先上上亲子音乐课再说。
j*i
40 楼
楼主,
已站内发信.请问能否告知您的联系方式?我可以将简历发给您。
或者请您给我发一个邮件。s*******[email protected]
谢谢您的帮助。
【在 j*****i 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 楼主,
: 已站内发信.
: 谢谢您的帮助。
s*9
42 楼
I have to say that you need to reorganize your materials and reapply.
Claimed too much weak pionts that cannot stand for extraordinary ability.
【在 x**l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 不好意思,我把我的基本情况综合了一下再在这里发一次,希望各位大侠帮我诊断一下看
: 看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
: Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
: prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
: The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
: that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
: 3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
: or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
: not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
: awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized
Claimed too much weak pionts that cannot stand for extraordinary ability.
【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 不好意思,我把我的基本情况综合了一下再在这里发一次,希望各位大侠帮我诊断一下看
: 看我的case还有没有希望.谢谢了.
: Evidence of the receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized
: prizes or awards for excellence in the field of evidence.
: The petitioner has submitted prizes or awards received by the beneficiary
: that appear to have been received while early in your career. Receiving a
: 3rd place awards are not considered major national or international prizes
: or awards, since this not a 1st or 2nd place award, and furthermore it has
: not been established the significance of this award. Receiving teaching
: awards are not considered to be nationally or internationally recognized
k*4
43 楼
楼主怎么联系你?能给我发个Email吗?这是我邮箱k***[email protected]
谢谢
谢谢
h*z
45 楼
Bless!
X*y
46 楼
站内信了,谢谢楼主
j*n
48 楼
如果是找律师做的case 那么强烈建议换律师 太不负责了
h*u
49 楼
mark
c*u
50 楼
也听说Suzuki,还以为是给小小孩学小提琴的,看来不是那么回事啊,高人能否再指点
一下Suzuki和wolf heart或正式学小提琴的区别。谢谢!
【在 l**a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 其实小提琴大点学,还学的挺快的。
: 对于小的,Suzuki很好,要想基本功练的好,Suzuki不够。
: 半年前,我们在Suzuki第二本的时候,上了wolf heart,60,
: 现在已经完成了40首 study。Suzuki第三册两个月拉完。
: 现在在拉第四册,也快完了。
: 老师说,我们拉的wolf heart的练习比Suzuki第五册的都难。
: 对小小孩,学乐理不容易,Suzuki是美国孩子喜欢的,
: 美国小孩太受宠了,只上Suzuki是不行的。
: 我们孩子11岁,理解能力比较强,老师要求比较严格。
: 小小孩拉歌还是有趣的,但是要掌握,就要基本功,
一下Suzuki和wolf heart或正式学小提琴的区别。谢谢!
【在 l**a 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 其实小提琴大点学,还学的挺快的。
: 对于小的,Suzuki很好,要想基本功练的好,Suzuki不够。
: 半年前,我们在Suzuki第二本的时候,上了wolf heart,60,
: 现在已经完成了40首 study。Suzuki第三册两个月拉完。
: 现在在拉第四册,也快完了。
: 老师说,我们拉的wolf heart的练习比Suzuki第五册的都难。
: 对小小孩,学乐理不容易,Suzuki是美国孩子喜欢的,
: 美国小孩太受宠了,只上Suzuki是不行的。
: 我们孩子11岁,理解能力比较强,老师要求比较严格。
: 小小孩拉歌还是有趣的,但是要掌握,就要基本功,
l*a
56 楼
伊扎克·帕尔曼( Itzhak Perlman)演奏流浪者之歌
c*u
62 楼
真感谢你的回复啊!最近一家人都病了,手忙脚乱。。。我放《流浪者之歌》给女儿听
,她好像也很喜欢呢。她喜欢听的梁祝是这首,以前她会拉二胡的爷爷也爱听的:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_qd-9wD6qA
学乐器最佳年龄是什么时候呢?如果你女儿找到自己一生的爱好作为职业,真是很难得
的啊。
【在 l**a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我们已经学了,现在在乐队参加表演。。。以后怎么样,要看她自己的选择。
: 我现在回想自己,其实我爸为我做了很多。。。
: 很多时候也干涉了我的人生。
: 我觉得他们做的已经够多了,没做的那些,我一点不觉得少。
: 我不遗憾我小时候没学,我家在学乐器的最佳年龄没学乐器。
: 我带她学了几年芭蕾,我觉得女孩身材要好点吧。后来是她自己要学。
: 她现在很感兴趣,我是被动去做的,我也担心结果是什么。实话实说。
,她好像也很喜欢呢。她喜欢听的梁祝是这首,以前她会拉二胡的爷爷也爱听的:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_qd-9wD6qA
学乐器最佳年龄是什么时候呢?如果你女儿找到自己一生的爱好作为职业,真是很难得
的啊。
【在 l**a 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我们已经学了,现在在乐队参加表演。。。以后怎么样,要看她自己的选择。
: 我现在回想自己,其实我爸为我做了很多。。。
: 很多时候也干涉了我的人生。
: 我觉得他们做的已经够多了,没做的那些,我一点不觉得少。
: 我不遗憾我小时候没学,我家在学乐器的最佳年龄没学乐器。
: 我带她学了几年芭蕾,我觉得女孩身材要好点吧。后来是她自己要学。
: 她现在很感兴趣,我是被动去做的,我也担心结果是什么。实话实说。
h*i
64 楼
我自己路数是2岁开始练耳先行的,然后是节奏。这个听音明显就是应该早于看谱。娃
也是Suzuki起家的,和弦听得非常好,Suzuki本身就不是重在指法练习,你肯定要加别
的。早期启蒙的时候不需枯燥的给孩子找个家庭钢琴老师,早上起床到晚上睡觉家里随
时有背景音乐就好了。我们弹一些古典或者流行音乐的的时候,娃自己想着都能弹出来
,也能自己也写点曲子弹一番,这个音乐啊,要让娃有兴趣去学才行,耳朵比眼睛难培
养多了,要早。
时间我安排得紧凑一些,视唱练耳一次,钢琴和小提琴连着学,小提琴在钢琴后1年开
始的,考虑以后学总谱。
【在 c*******u 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 听起来很专业!谢谢!两岁就能学节奏和视唱吗?每天看她真很无聊的样子~想给她学
: 个什么东西消磨一下时间。
也是Suzuki起家的,和弦听得非常好,Suzuki本身就不是重在指法练习,你肯定要加别
的。早期启蒙的时候不需枯燥的给孩子找个家庭钢琴老师,早上起床到晚上睡觉家里随
时有背景音乐就好了。我们弹一些古典或者流行音乐的的时候,娃自己想着都能弹出来
,也能自己也写点曲子弹一番,这个音乐啊,要让娃有兴趣去学才行,耳朵比眼睛难培
养多了,要早。
时间我安排得紧凑一些,视唱练耳一次,钢琴和小提琴连着学,小提琴在钢琴后1年开
始的,考虑以后学总谱。
【在 c*******u 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 听起来很专业!谢谢!两岁就能学节奏和视唱吗?每天看她真很无聊的样子~想给她学
: 个什么东西消磨一下时间。
l*a
66 楼
我最近出门了,现在天气变化,你要注意身体啊。
你家里有音乐基因啊,让爷爷教不是正好吗?
我也不知道什么最佳,我知道有个天才儿童4岁开始学小提琴的。
我也不知道我女儿是否一定吃音乐这碗饭,太早了吧。
老师都说很难的。
我确实在为她出力,带她参加演出,上周末晚上还带她去听音乐会了。
古典音乐,巴赫,和博拉母斯的作品,上半场巴赫的不蓝伯格,我完全睡着了,
中场休息被叫醒的,下半场听的还好,因为我实在太累了,我是早睡早起的人。
又忙了一天为了演出,和别的家长social。
我觉得干音乐太辛苦了,晚上9点以后还在兴高采烈取悦观众,
半夜12点以后才回家。以后有小孩,也不能自己带了。
搞音乐太辛苦了,这还是好的。能吃上饭,不能吃上饭的,上不了舞台的,怎么办。
我女儿说她将来不要小孩,或者很老的时候再说。
【在 c*******u 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 真感谢你的回复啊!最近一家人都病了,手忙脚乱。。。我放《流浪者之歌》给女儿听
: ,她好像也很喜欢呢。她喜欢听的梁祝是这首,以前她会拉二胡的爷爷也爱听的:
: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_qd-9wD6qA
: 学乐器最佳年龄是什么时候呢?如果你女儿找到自己一生的爱好作为职业,真是很难得
: 的啊。
你家里有音乐基因啊,让爷爷教不是正好吗?
我也不知道什么最佳,我知道有个天才儿童4岁开始学小提琴的。
我也不知道我女儿是否一定吃音乐这碗饭,太早了吧。
老师都说很难的。
我确实在为她出力,带她参加演出,上周末晚上还带她去听音乐会了。
古典音乐,巴赫,和博拉母斯的作品,上半场巴赫的不蓝伯格,我完全睡着了,
中场休息被叫醒的,下半场听的还好,因为我实在太累了,我是早睡早起的人。
又忙了一天为了演出,和别的家长social。
我觉得干音乐太辛苦了,晚上9点以后还在兴高采烈取悦观众,
半夜12点以后才回家。以后有小孩,也不能自己带了。
搞音乐太辛苦了,这还是好的。能吃上饭,不能吃上饭的,上不了舞台的,怎么办。
我女儿说她将来不要小孩,或者很老的时候再说。
【在 c*******u 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 真感谢你的回复啊!最近一家人都病了,手忙脚乱。。。我放《流浪者之歌》给女儿听
: ,她好像也很喜欢呢。她喜欢听的梁祝是这首,以前她会拉二胡的爷爷也爱听的:
: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_qd-9wD6qA
: 学乐器最佳年龄是什么时候呢?如果你女儿找到自己一生的爱好作为职业,真是很难得
: 的啊。
c*u
67 楼
爷爷今年一月份去世了。。。
如果孩子真喜欢音乐,当饭吃也未尝不可,但确实没几个能真正成大家的吧。
【在 l**a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我最近出门了,现在天气变化,你要注意身体啊。
: 你家里有音乐基因啊,让爷爷教不是正好吗?
: 我也不知道什么最佳,我知道有个天才儿童4岁开始学小提琴的。
: 我也不知道我女儿是否一定吃音乐这碗饭,太早了吧。
: 老师都说很难的。
: 我确实在为她出力,带她参加演出,上周末晚上还带她去听音乐会了。
: 古典音乐,巴赫,和博拉母斯的作品,上半场巴赫的不蓝伯格,我完全睡着了,
: 中场休息被叫醒的,下半场听的还好,因为我实在太累了,我是早睡早起的人。
: 又忙了一天为了演出,和别的家长social。
: 我觉得干音乐太辛苦了,晚上9点以后还在兴高采烈取悦观众,
如果孩子真喜欢音乐,当饭吃也未尝不可,但确实没几个能真正成大家的吧。
【在 l**a 的大作中提到】
![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png)
: 我最近出门了,现在天气变化,你要注意身体啊。
: 你家里有音乐基因啊,让爷爷教不是正好吗?
: 我也不知道什么最佳,我知道有个天才儿童4岁开始学小提琴的。
: 我也不知道我女儿是否一定吃音乐这碗饭,太早了吧。
: 老师都说很难的。
: 我确实在为她出力,带她参加演出,上周末晚上还带她去听音乐会了。
: 古典音乐,巴赫,和博拉母斯的作品,上半场巴赫的不蓝伯格,我完全睡着了,
: 中场休息被叫醒的,下半场听的还好,因为我实在太累了,我是早睡早起的人。
: 又忙了一天为了演出,和别的家长social。
: 我觉得干音乐太辛苦了,晚上9点以后还在兴高采烈取悦观众,
相关阅读
[RFE help]如何找objective evidence如果citations<5?给父母办绿卡,糊涂了妈的,要失业了,绿卡还没去打指纹EB1B TSC RFE关于file EB1A-140 的相关问题,怎么PP和什么时机PP?今天的包子就发到这儿eb1b求评估[TSC NIW 140 Approved]【EB1B 求评估】下周可能发生政府关门对绿卡审批的影响?1a 弱 case pp 会不会增加被拒的可能性131申请一问eb1-b 求评估,公司律师说有风险Eb1a 140 RFE response今天寄走, 急求blessTSC, 刚收到短信说131和765批了求评估NSC和TSC的杀手名单?DIY EB1A 140 材料刚寄去TSC,求bless~~~这样算不算商品化!用了国内正规的公证处 的出生证明 结婚证明, 却被RFE了