c*x
2 楼
Background: bio postdoc at good university affiliated hospital.
Papers: 15 English + 2 Chinese. Only four English papers are first author
papers with IF around 3-4. Four 3rd author papers are around IF 2-8. The
rest are 4th to 5th author papers around IF 3-8.
Citations: 108 from Google scholar, not differentiate other citations.
RLs: 7 RLs (5 are independent) + 2 editor letters.
That was the data of December 2012.
Now:
Paper: has one more 5th author paper (IF 9) and one more non-peer review
paper (first-author)
Citations: 129
Papers: 15 English + 2 Chinese. Only four English papers are first author
papers with IF around 3-4. Four 3rd author papers are around IF 2-8. The
rest are 4th to 5th author papers around IF 3-8.
Citations: 108 from Google scholar, not differentiate other citations.
RLs: 7 RLs (5 are independent) + 2 editor letters.
That was the data of December 2012.
Now:
Paper: has one more 5th author paper (IF 9) and one more non-peer review
paper (first-author)
Citations: 129
s*u
3 楼
电子卡
c*x
4 楼
The officer is XM1244.
Contribution of the 1st step is not passed.
Judging others work is passed.
Publication: he does not mention at all.
My feeling is that he did not read my RLs and PL carefully. I have one from
a startup CEO stating that they have directly used my finding in their work.
I also have one support letter saying that their work are based on my study.
I am planning to
1. ask for 2-3 RLs. I am going to ask very short version that will just
evidence my small percentage or prove my niubility.
2. reorganize the contribution part by saying
2.1 My journals are top by giving eigenfactor.
2.2 My papers are cited by great papers, by great people all over the word.
2.3 My citations have been increasing rapidly, about 20 times in 3 months.
2.4 My papers are used by reviews and books, those books are
internationally circulating.
2.5 Other top scientists say I am a top.
My question is he does not mention my publication is passed or not. what I
should do for this part?
Fill exhausted and no idea of how to draft the RLs.
Contribution of the 1st step is not passed.
Judging others work is passed.
Publication: he does not mention at all.
My feeling is that he did not read my RLs and PL carefully. I have one from
a startup CEO stating that they have directly used my finding in their work.
I also have one support letter saying that their work are based on my study.
I am planning to
1. ask for 2-3 RLs. I am going to ask very short version that will just
evidence my small percentage or prove my niubility.
2. reorganize the contribution part by saying
2.1 My journals are top by giving eigenfactor.
2.2 My papers are cited by great papers, by great people all over the word.
2.3 My citations have been increasing rapidly, about 20 times in 3 months.
2.4 My papers are used by reviews and books, those books are
internationally circulating.
2.5 Other top scientists say I am a top.
My question is he does not mention my publication is passed or not. what I
should do for this part?
Fill exhausted and no idea of how to draft the RLs.
h*s
5 楼
全是egc。 直接显示在手机屏幕上。
[在 longlost1 (ll) 的大作中提到：]
:同上
[在 longlost1 (ll) 的大作中提到：]
:同上
c*x
6 楼
BTW, what my attorney should do then?
l*1
7 楼
谢二位。可我买完后，Amx 已经显示了，但e-card code从未出现啊？email里也没有。
c*x
8 楼
up
s*d
9 楼
在MPX app里。
【在 l*******1 的大作中提到】
: 谢二位。可我买完后，Amx 已经显示了，但e-card code从未出现啊？email里也没有。
【在 l*******1 的大作中提到】
: 谢二位。可我买完后，Amx 已经显示了，但e-card code从未出现啊？email里也没有。
L*i
10 楼
帮顶
l*1
11 楼
找到了：） 谢！
b*e
12 楼
帮顶
u*e
13 楼
这是不是典型的rfe? 就是说2步法没过，靠考古吧。再找几封推荐信，再挖掘一下硬条
件，再上吧。
件，再上吧。
c*x
14 楼
Thanks. sign..
d*n
15 楼
"...While it is commendable that his articles were selected for publication,
pulication and citatioin are inherent to scholarly research"
---From this point, the IO recognized your authorship and accepted your
original contribution (it should be decided from your authorship), but did
not recognized that the contribution is significant.
【在 c***x 的大作中提到】
: Background: bio postdoc at good university affiliated hospital.
: Papers: 15 English + 2 Chinese. Only four English papers are first author
: papers with IF around 3-4. Four 3rd author papers are around IF 2-8. The
: rest are 4th to 5th author papers around IF 3-8.
: Citations: 108 from Google scholar, not differentiate other citations.
: RLs: 7 RLs (5 are independent) + 2 editor letters.
: That was the data of December 2012.
: Now:
: Paper: has one more 5th author paper (IF 9) and one more non-peer review
: paper (first-author)
pulication and citatioin are inherent to scholarly research"
---From this point, the IO recognized your authorship and accepted your
original contribution (it should be decided from your authorship), but did
not recognized that the contribution is significant.
【在 c***x 的大作中提到】
: Background: bio postdoc at good university affiliated hospital.
: Papers: 15 English + 2 Chinese. Only four English papers are first author
: papers with IF around 3-4. Four 3rd author papers are around IF 2-8. The
: rest are 4th to 5th author papers around IF 3-8.
: Citations: 108 from Google scholar, not differentiate other citations.
: RLs: 7 RLs (5 are independent) + 2 editor letters.
: That was the data of December 2012.
: Now:
: Paper: has one more 5th author paper (IF 9) and one more non-peer review
: paper (first-author)
相关阅读
顶着锅盖真诚提个建议：大家少用Bless吧自己申请EAD和AP可以吗？485 pending期间 dependent 是否需要 file H4在线等：765是免费的吗 (请见4楼附件）果然ＰＰ被ＲＦＥ了。1A等得焦虑了，不会被R了吧Reentry permit办理时间信的内容基本一样，推荐人不一样140 supporting document寄到会通知吗？I140 RFE的信上有一个9位数的A#律师改推荐信一般要花多长时间Form G-325A要推荐信真郁闷阿回国问题再问一个citation 计算的问题亮虎兄要不要再考虑一下当版主？终于找到了自己是top的证据啦6月的485， 直接 Card/ Document Production 没收到 approval noticeEB1B, I485 交了6个月？能做service request了吗？Eb1a + PP寄错地方了郁闷啊