NSC EB1b PP RFE 0002 求助# Immigration - 落地生根
P*C
1 楼
背景:
文章:11 期刊 (7一作)+10会议
审稿:40次
引用:总共80,独立引用只有40吧
推荐信:5封,1封博士老板,4封独立;一封欧洲,四封美国。
公司的律师,claim的比较多。又遇到了传说中的0002,RFE的比较惨
i)Documentation of the beneficiary's recipt of major prizes or awards for
outstanding achivement in the academic field.
这根本没有claim。只是在contribution里面提了一些读书期间的学校奖项,开会的
travel award。结果下面列了很长的说只有那些国家级的奖才算,这个没有met。
我也自知这条根本不可能满足。请问回复RFE的时候这条该怎么回?是不理睬就当没有
这条还是简单的说承认自己不满足这条要求?
iii) Published material in professional publications written by others about
the beneficiary's work in the academic field.
律师claim了这条,用的是我的citation和一些小网站的媒体报道,包括自己学校的,
NewsRX的等。当时我要求不要claim这条,因为也觉得不满足。只是觉得媒体报道可以
放到contribution里面去加强,但是。。
RFE主要是两条:
The criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicate that
the published material was published in professional publications. To assist
in determining that the publications qualify as professiona, you may submit:
Documentary evidence including:
The title, date,and author of the material;
The circulation (online/or print) and
The indended audience of the publication
还有
The criterion has not been met because the publications do not provide the
author of the publications. To meet the plain language of this criterion you
may submit:
Copies of submitted articles identifying the title , date and author of the
material and any necesary translation.
请问这条还需要response吗?我一直觉得用citation论述支持这条不妥,用媒体报道吧
我的证据又不是很强,估计也defense不过去。可以干脆放弃defense这个吗?还是说不
管满足不满足,按照他RFE的要求,把引用我文章的文章信息,期刊信息和网站媒体报
道的信息补齐就算了?
iv) Judge of work of others ,这条承认满足
v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the Academic field.
The criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary has made original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the Academic field. To assisant in determining whether the
beneficiary's contributions are orginal, you may submit:
Objective documentary evidence of the beneficiary's contribution to their
academic field.
Documentary evidence that pepople throughout the field currently consider
the beneficary's work as original
Testimony and/ support letter from experts which discuss the beneficiary's
original scientific contributions
Evidence that the beneficiary's original contribution has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited
Evidence of the beneficary's work being implemented by others.
我打算再要两封独立推荐信,重点说original scientific contribution。还有什么能
够帮助这条的吗?
vi) Evidence of the beneficary's authorship of scholarly books or articles (
in scholarly journals with international circulation) in the academic field.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence is incomplete. Please
submit a complete record of the scholarly books or articles(in scholarly
journals with international circulation) in the academic field that the
beneficiary has authored. You may submit:
Updated results from scholarly literature search websites(such as SciFinder
or Google scholar) that show the beneficiary's citation records excluding
cites by the beneficiary , the beneficiary's coauthors and the beneficiary's
research group members.
之前已经把自己所有文章,会议打印提交了。打算按照要求,把自己发表文章的期刊详
细介绍,把独立引用全部整理,打印独立引用paper第一页,介绍独立引用的期刊,国
家分布等。
最后是第二步, 说totally不满足
The Evidence provided shows that the benficiary has acted as a judge of the
work of others in their academic field. However, further documentary
evidence is needed to establish that the judging establishes the beneficiary
is recognized internationally as outstanding in the academic field
specified in the petition. To assisant in determining that the judging
establishes that the beneficiary is recognized internationally as
outstanding in their academic field, you may submit:
Documentary evidence showing that the act of judging was based on beneficary
's oustanding recognition. Examples include are not limit to:
editorial position
reviewing a large number of articles
serving as a judge for selection of recognized prizes and or memberships.
打算找审稿的期刊再要1~2封编辑推荐信,证明是因为internationally recognized才
邀请我审稿。
请问大家还有什么好的建议回复这样的RFE吗?如果刚开始claim了四条现在可以回信说
改回只claim老三样吗?
多谢多谢!
文章:11 期刊 (7一作)+10会议
审稿:40次
引用:总共80,独立引用只有40吧
推荐信:5封,1封博士老板,4封独立;一封欧洲,四封美国。
公司的律师,claim的比较多。又遇到了传说中的0002,RFE的比较惨
i)Documentation of the beneficiary's recipt of major prizes or awards for
outstanding achivement in the academic field.
这根本没有claim。只是在contribution里面提了一些读书期间的学校奖项,开会的
travel award。结果下面列了很长的说只有那些国家级的奖才算,这个没有met。
我也自知这条根本不可能满足。请问回复RFE的时候这条该怎么回?是不理睬就当没有
这条还是简单的说承认自己不满足这条要求?
iii) Published material in professional publications written by others about
the beneficiary's work in the academic field.
律师claim了这条,用的是我的citation和一些小网站的媒体报道,包括自己学校的,
NewsRX的等。当时我要求不要claim这条,因为也觉得不满足。只是觉得媒体报道可以
放到contribution里面去加强,但是。。
RFE主要是两条:
The criterion has not been met because the evidence does not indicate that
the published material was published in professional publications. To assist
in determining that the publications qualify as professiona, you may submit:
Documentary evidence including:
The title, date,and author of the material;
The circulation (online/or print) and
The indended audience of the publication
还有
The criterion has not been met because the publications do not provide the
author of the publications. To meet the plain language of this criterion you
may submit:
Copies of submitted articles identifying the title , date and author of the
material and any necesary translation.
请问这条还需要response吗?我一直觉得用citation论述支持这条不妥,用媒体报道吧
我的证据又不是很强,估计也defense不过去。可以干脆放弃defense这个吗?还是说不
管满足不满足,按照他RFE的要求,把引用我文章的文章信息,期刊信息和网站媒体报
道的信息补齐就算了?
iv) Judge of work of others ,这条承认满足
v) Evidence of the beneficiary's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the Academic field.
The criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary has made original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the Academic field. To assisant in determining whether the
beneficiary's contributions are orginal, you may submit:
Objective documentary evidence of the beneficiary's contribution to their
academic field.
Documentary evidence that pepople throughout the field currently consider
the beneficary's work as original
Testimony and/ support letter from experts which discuss the beneficiary's
original scientific contributions
Evidence that the beneficiary's original contribution has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited
Evidence of the beneficary's work being implemented by others.
我打算再要两封独立推荐信,重点说original scientific contribution。还有什么能
够帮助这条的吗?
vi) Evidence of the beneficary's authorship of scholarly books or articles (
in scholarly journals with international circulation) in the academic field.
This criterion has not been met because the evidence is incomplete. Please
submit a complete record of the scholarly books or articles(in scholarly
journals with international circulation) in the academic field that the
beneficiary has authored. You may submit:
Updated results from scholarly literature search websites(such as SciFinder
or Google scholar) that show the beneficiary's citation records excluding
cites by the beneficiary , the beneficiary's coauthors and the beneficiary's
research group members.
之前已经把自己所有文章,会议打印提交了。打算按照要求,把自己发表文章的期刊详
细介绍,把独立引用全部整理,打印独立引用paper第一页,介绍独立引用的期刊,国
家分布等。
最后是第二步, 说totally不满足
The Evidence provided shows that the benficiary has acted as a judge of the
work of others in their academic field. However, further documentary
evidence is needed to establish that the judging establishes the beneficiary
is recognized internationally as outstanding in the academic field
specified in the petition. To assisant in determining that the judging
establishes that the beneficiary is recognized internationally as
outstanding in their academic field, you may submit:
Documentary evidence showing that the act of judging was based on beneficary
's oustanding recognition. Examples include are not limit to:
editorial position
reviewing a large number of articles
serving as a judge for selection of recognized prizes and or memberships.
打算找审稿的期刊再要1~2封编辑推荐信,证明是因为internationally recognized才
邀请我审稿。
请问大家还有什么好的建议回复这样的RFE吗?如果刚开始claim了四条现在可以回信说
改回只claim老三样吗?
多谢多谢!