大家帮忙看看律师的话,心颤# Immigration - 落地生根
t*f
1 楼
本来修改了的eb1a PL，结果律师这么说了，心颤...
1) Description of the journals in which you have been published is unlikely
to be considered significant, especially as relevant journal statistics have
already been included (i.e. impact factor, ranking, etc.)
2) We strongly prefer to use SCImago, Google Scholar Metrics, and impact
factor statistics over Eigenfactor scores
3) The USCIS is unlikely to consider impact factors below 4 as significant.
4) Providing the journal information for papers which have cited your work
is unlikely to be considered significant and will likely not strengthen your
case. We should instead focus on your own publications.
5) It is unnecessary to list and describe the citations to your works, and
is unlikely to strengthen your case.
1) Description of the journals in which you have been published is unlikely
to be considered significant, especially as relevant journal statistics have
already been included (i.e. impact factor, ranking, etc.)
2) We strongly prefer to use SCImago, Google Scholar Metrics, and impact
factor statistics over Eigenfactor scores
3) The USCIS is unlikely to consider impact factors below 4 as significant.
4) Providing the journal information for papers which have cited your work
is unlikely to be considered significant and will likely not strengthen your
case. We should instead focus on your own publications.
5) It is unnecessary to list and describe the citations to your works, and
is unlikely to strengthen your case.
