x*6
2 楼
副申请人需要出示Employment Letter吗？
O*3
3 楼
开什么玩笑，副申请人很多是还穿着开档裤呢。
x*6
4 楼
但是网上有这样一篇文章
http://www.cilawgroup.com/news/2013/06/18/uscis-issues-numerous
"Derivative Dependents Issued Identical RFEs
What is somewhat troubling is that USCIS has issued RFEs with identical
language to derivative dependents. Specifically, dependents’ RFEs
include the phrase “You are an Employment-Based Principal Applicant” which
is plainly incorrect for derivative beneficiaries.
Also, the RFE for derivatives asks for evidence in the same two areas as
primary applicants without any consideration that such documents or
information may not be applicable for derivative family member applicants.
For example, a derivative applicant’s RFE asks for proof of continued
employment authorization since the filing of I-485. Many derivative
applicants, especially children, do not seek and obtain EAD work permits as
part of their I-485 application. In fact, whether or not a derivative
applicant is employed (unless on status permitting employment such as H-1B
or L-1), is not a factor in the I-485 adjudication.
The RFE for derivative applicants also asks for a letter from “your
petitioning (Form I-140) employer.” Derivative I-485 applicants, by
definition, do not have a petitioning I-140 sponsor employer. It is
unclear what is USCIS’s motive — whether they seek such a letter from the
primary applicant’s sponsoring employer, or simply that they reused the
template without regard to a specific case’s parameters."
http://www.cilawgroup.com/news/2013/06/18/uscis-issues-numerous
"Derivative Dependents Issued Identical RFEs
What is somewhat troubling is that USCIS has issued RFEs with identical
language to derivative dependents. Specifically, dependents’ RFEs
include the phrase “You are an Employment-Based Principal Applicant” which
is plainly incorrect for derivative beneficiaries.
Also, the RFE for derivatives asks for evidence in the same two areas as
primary applicants without any consideration that such documents or
information may not be applicable for derivative family member applicants.
For example, a derivative applicant’s RFE asks for proof of continued
employment authorization since the filing of I-485. Many derivative
applicants, especially children, do not seek and obtain EAD work permits as
part of their I-485 application. In fact, whether or not a derivative
applicant is employed (unless on status permitting employment such as H-1B
or L-1), is not a factor in the I-485 adjudication.
The RFE for derivative applicants also asks for a letter from “your
petitioning (Form I-140) employer.” Derivative I-485 applicants, by
definition, do not have a petitioning I-140 sponsor employer. It is
unclear what is USCIS’s motive — whether they seek such a letter from the
primary applicant’s sponsoring employer, or simply that they reused the
template without regard to a specific case’s parameters."
相关阅读
EB1B现在claim两项能行吗？[Gone] 谢谢大家！两篇审稿机会，同时求祝福早绿Eb1a需要单独写一份研究领域介绍吗？niw推荐信求助AP加急要多少钱？请问EB1A 140批了之后该干什么？我也把我的RFE贴出来，请大牛们多多指教Eb1B求评估紧急请教一个关于485相关表格的问题(updated: 08/20/2012 APPROVED! NSC)RFE submitted, ask for BLESSES!非一作的文章，被好杂志大段引用，可以claim吗？问：I140， 485与visa的关系（Updated）今天刚收到！6月21号的TSC485需要大家的祝福：等FP国内开的中文出生证明可以在美国公正吗？请教一个在专业数据库中文章被refer的问题贡献一个扫号器网站请问NSC EB1B PP平均时间多久啊哪里可以查到关于NIW 的文件,法律条文email收到receipt number多久能查到状态？eb1b，公司律师坚持不让pp，是不是就没辙了？