i*1
2 楼
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
contribution to the field;
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary’s work important.
contribution to the field;
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary’s work important.
k*y
3 楼
知道plano的乔冠超市吗？就在那个plaza里，和梅子料理挨着。
刚开业时吃过是自助，现在据说还是，可以去看看。
建议早去，晚了还要排队等号。
刚开业时吃过是自助，现在据说还是，可以去看看。
建议早去，晚了还要排队等号。
j*e
4 楼
第一种可以是引用的数量和分布，根据你的工作别人研发的技术或产品，你的专利创造
的价值，新技术或新产品创造的销售额，等等
第二种就是专家的推荐信了
the
【在 i*********1 的大作中提到】
: Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
: contribution to the field;
: Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
: beneficiary’s work important.
的价值，新技术或新产品创造的销售额，等等
第二种就是专家的推荐信了
the
【在 i*********1 的大作中提到】
: Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
: contribution to the field;
: Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
: beneficiary’s work important.
k*y
5 楼
这个是乔冠的地址。240 Legacy Dr. Plano Tx, 75023
到那就能找到了。
到那就能找到了。
i*1
6 楼
我觉得第二条不是推荐信，因为还有第三条就是推荐信。
【在 j****e 的大作中提到】
: 第一种可以是引用的数量和分布，根据你的工作别人研发的技术或产品，你的专利创造
: 的价值，新技术或新产品创造的销售额，等等
: 第二种就是专家的推荐信了
:
: the
【在 j****e 的大作中提到】
: 第一种可以是引用的数量和分布，根据你的工作别人研发的技术或产品，你的专利创造
: 的价值，新技术或新产品创造的销售额，等等
: 第二种就是专家的推荐信了
:
: the
a*e
7 楼
谢谢MM
p*r
8 楼
专文评论、主编热评、网站评论、各类媒体报道。
a*e
9 楼
谢谢MM
i*1
10 楼
你说的这个是我列的第二条？
【在 p********r 的大作中提到】
: 专文评论、主编热评、网站评论、各类媒体报道。
【在 p********r 的大作中提到】
: 专文评论、主编热评、网站评论、各类媒体报道。
h*8
11 楼
我的理解如下
各种有影响的排名，数据等
the
同行对你工作的书面介绍，讨论，评述等等；同行向你索取数据，图表，文章的信件；
同行请求和你合作的信件；有影响的会议，学校，机构特邀你演讲的信件；其它类似书
面材料
【在 i*********1 的大作中提到】
: Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
: contribution to the field;
: Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
: beneficiary’s work important.
各种有影响的排名，数据等
the
同行对你工作的书面介绍，讨论，评述等等；同行向你索取数据，图表，文章的信件；
同行请求和你合作的信件；有影响的会议，学校，机构特邀你演讲的信件；其它类似书
面材料
【在 i*********1 的大作中提到】
: Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
: contribution to the field;
: Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
: beneficiary’s work important.
o*i
12 楼
我觉得
第一个不能是推荐信
第二个就是更多推荐信
第一个不能是推荐信
第二个就是更多推荐信
m*r
13 楼
我觉得puma的帖子写的很好
新春快乐！NSC-EB1a-DIY-PP-RFE通过---puma致谢及总结帖：
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33436207.html
回馈本版—PUMA之弱Case-RFE策略：
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33439585.html
PUMA再回馈本版----EBI-AAO判例关于贡献的评判之解析：
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33447391.html
Evidence does not Establish that the Original Scientific, Scholarly,
Artistic, Athletic, or Businessrelated
Contributions are of Major Significance
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary’s
contributions are considered to be of major significance in the field of
endeavor. [ISO should explain
why the evidence submitted is insufficient to establish eligibility]. To
assist in determining whether
the beneficiary’s contributions are original and of major significance in
the field, the petitioner may
submit:
• Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the
beneficiary’s contribution
to the field.
• Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the
beneficiary’s work important.
• Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s
contributions of major significance.
• Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s)
has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
• Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others.
Possible evidence
may include but is not limited to:
o Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
o Licensed technology being used by others;
o Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about the
beneficiary’s contribution and must explain, in detail, how the
contribution was “original” (not
merely replicating the work of others) and how they were of “major”
significance. General
statements regarding the importance of the endeavors are insufficient.
新春快乐！NSC-EB1a-DIY-PP-RFE通过---puma致谢及总结帖：
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33436207.html
回馈本版—PUMA之弱Case-RFE策略：
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33439585.html
PUMA再回馈本版----EBI-AAO判例关于贡献的评判之解析：
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33447391.html
Evidence does not Establish that the Original Scientific, Scholarly,
Artistic, Athletic, or Businessrelated
Contributions are of Major Significance
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary’s
contributions are considered to be of major significance in the field of
endeavor. [ISO should explain
why the evidence submitted is insufficient to establish eligibility]. To
assist in determining whether
the beneficiary’s contributions are original and of major significance in
the field, the petitioner may
submit:
• Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the
beneficiary’s contribution
to the field.
• Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the
beneficiary’s work important.
• Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary’s
contributions of major significance.
• Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s)
has provoked
widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
• Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others.
Possible evidence
may include but is not limited to:
o Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
o Licensed technology being used by others;
o Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about the
beneficiary’s contribution and must explain, in detail, how the
contribution was “original” (not
merely replicating the work of others) and how they were of “major”
significance. General
statements regarding the importance of the endeavors are insufficient.
相关阅读
分享一下疫情期间申请SSN的时间线打指纹失败的情况中国知网英文文献下载 帮忙疫情期间H1B被Layoff，希望大家可以分享经验和看法又和奥本喝了杯morning coffee问一个回国工作的问题求购一张2018年12月485状态更新，Request for Initial Evidence Was Sent美国EB-5移民法案延期至9月30日NIW的485面试需要带所有的petition材料吗？分享intial OPT TIME linecombo卡提交申请以后是不是有效期结束之后还有三个月grace period？现在哪个中国领馆还能换护照？史上最全移民加拿大攻略(四)：低门槛的省提名技术移民美国第2轮纾困金更丰厚，但要等更久.....传说中的EB1a申请真的遥不可及吗？明天(10月17号) S386要卷土重来??加拿大留学如何转移民？盘点加拿大各省留学移民政策eb1b-公司律师让我找在国际会议上做会议报告的证据[情报] 最新S386战报- 请拉人打电话。印度人准备进行下一波攻势！