详细情况请见下面这个贴子: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33558157.html 简单来说,就是主卡还没批,副卡批了,找议员催绿,结果议员说TSC要先收会已经批 了三个多月的副卡,再一起处理我们的CASE。今天收到了TSC要求寄回绿卡的信。 前面三段是大段引用法律条文,大意是说他们有权在五年内收回错误发出的绿卡。 第 四段进入重点,如下: In this case, although a visa was available at the time your application was adjudicated, as a derivative you cannot precede the principal applicant as a lawful permenent resident. Accordingly, as a derivative of your spouse (my name) you cannot derive the status of a lawful permenent resident at this time. Please return the I-551 permanent residence card back to USCIS since your application was prematurely approved in error. Once the I-551 card is returned your application will be placed back into pending status until your spouse's (my name) visa number from China becomes available. You must place this card in an envelope marked "Do not Open In Mailroom ATTN: Officer # 0168". 最后还有一小段更像是威胁,如果30天没收到就会导致申请撤销。 整体来说,感觉很不好,好像是我们这方导致的错误一样,而且信里没有提到向议员承 诺的收到卡会很快处理我们的CASE的内容, 而是要等到我的visa number available 。他们是不是要等到新财年开始才会处理。 不过从好的方面来看,TSC的意思似乎是说visa number available就可以批了, background check什么的应该都已经清了才会这么说吧?如果能十月批也还好,反正都 等了快就个月了,不在乎再多一个月,就是怕被忽悠了,又要无休止等待,还折上了老 婆已经批了的卡。
【在 h****2 的大作中提到】 : 详细情况请见下面这个贴子: : http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33558157.html : 简单来说,就是主卡还没批,副卡批了,找议员催绿,结果议员说TSC要先收会已经批 : 了三个多月的副卡,再一起处理我们的CASE。今天收到了TSC要求寄回绿卡的信。 : 前面三段是大段引用法律条文,大意是说他们有权在五年内收回错误发出的绿卡。 第 : 四段进入重点,如下: : In this case, although a visa was available at the time your application was : adjudicated, as a derivative you cannot precede the principal applicant as : a lawful permenent resident. Accordingly, as a derivative of your spouse (my : name) you cannot derive the status of a lawful permenent resident at this
l*g
17 楼
TSC 怎么知道你有没有收到这封信呢?他们经常错误百出,绿卡寄丢的事情也是有的。 。。
was as my
【在 h****2 的大作中提到】 : 详细情况请见下面这个贴子: : http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33558157.html : 简单来说,就是主卡还没批,副卡批了,找议员催绿,结果议员说TSC要先收会已经批 : 了三个多月的副卡,再一起处理我们的CASE。今天收到了TSC要求寄回绿卡的信。 : 前面三段是大段引用法律条文,大意是说他们有权在五年内收回错误发出的绿卡。 第 : 四段进入重点,如下: : In this case, although a visa was available at the time your application was : adjudicated, as a derivative you cannot precede the principal applicant as : a lawful permenent resident. Accordingly, as a derivative of your spouse (my : name) you cannot derive the status of a lawful permenent resident at this
【在 h****2 的大作中提到】 : 详细情况请见下面这个贴子: : http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33558157.html : 简单来说,就是主卡还没批,副卡批了,找议员催绿,结果议员说TSC要先收会已经批 : 了三个多月的副卡,再一起处理我们的CASE。今天收到了TSC要求寄回绿卡的信。 : 前面三段是大段引用法律条文,大意是说他们有权在五年内收回错误发出的绿卡。 第 : 四段进入重点,如下: : In this case, although a visa was available at the time your application was : adjudicated, as a derivative you cannot precede the principal applicant as : a lawful permenent resident. Accordingly, as a derivative of your spouse (my : name) you cannot derive the status of a lawful permenent resident at this
【在 h****2 的大作中提到】 : 详细情况请见下面这个贴子: : http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t0/Immigration/33558157.html : 简单来说,就是主卡还没批,副卡批了,找议员催绿,结果议员说TSC要先收会已经批 : 了三个多月的副卡,再一起处理我们的CASE。今天收到了TSC要求寄回绿卡的信。 : 前面三段是大段引用法律条文,大意是说他们有权在五年内收回错误发出的绿卡。 第 : 四段进入重点,如下: : In this case, although a visa was available at the time your application was : adjudicated, as a derivative you cannot precede the principal applicant as : a lawful permenent resident. Accordingly, as a derivative of your spouse (my : name) you cannot derive the status of a lawful permenent resident at this