EB1B NOID by NSC 0002# Immigration - 落地生根
e*n
1 楼
背景比较弱,之所以会上EB1b是因为单位支持,同时单位律师说问题不大。准备的时间
不短,但是并没有很深入的挖掘自己的材料,导致现在直接被NOID。我把NOID notice
贴出来,希望能够给有类似情况的同志们提供一点最新的信息。同时也希望能够得到各
位大神的指点和建议。还有30天恢复,感激不尽!
我的背景:美国二流学校EE毕业,phd。15篇期刊、会议论文,一作10篇。引用<50。有
一个IEEE student paper award,一个patent。
我和大多数人一样claim了老三样。Criteria Analysis方面肯定满足两项
USCIS has determined that the petitioner has provided sufficient
documentation to establish the beneficiary has met the following regulartory
criteria:
(1) Evidence of the alien's participation as the judge of the work of others
in the same or an allied academic field; and
(2) Evidence of the alien's authorship of scholarly books or articles (in
scholarly journals with international circulation) in the academic field.
但是质疑一项
USCIS has determined that the petitioner provided documentation, but failed
to establish eligibility for the following criteria:
(1) Evidence of the alien's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
并且解释为
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary has made original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
吐血!想必大家都知道如果不是original研究怎么可能发表在期刊会议论文。IO似乎华
丽丽的ignore了我所有7封推荐信。
Final Merits Analysis方面肯定我的材料充足,但是不足以outstanding。质疑文章
review是routine work。质疑我没有editorial position,质疑我是small, elite
group of referees。质疑论文方面的limited citation。因此推论不是
internationally outstanding。
不短,但是并没有很深入的挖掘自己的材料,导致现在直接被NOID。我把NOID notice
贴出来,希望能够给有类似情况的同志们提供一点最新的信息。同时也希望能够得到各
位大神的指点和建议。还有30天恢复,感激不尽!
我的背景:美国二流学校EE毕业,phd。15篇期刊、会议论文,一作10篇。引用<50。有
一个IEEE student paper award,一个patent。
我和大多数人一样claim了老三样。Criteria Analysis方面肯定满足两项
USCIS has determined that the petitioner has provided sufficient
documentation to establish the beneficiary has met the following regulartory
criteria:
(1) Evidence of the alien's participation as the judge of the work of others
in the same or an allied academic field; and
(2) Evidence of the alien's authorship of scholarly books or articles (in
scholarly journals with international circulation) in the academic field.
但是质疑一项
USCIS has determined that the petitioner provided documentation, but failed
to establish eligibility for the following criteria:
(1) Evidence of the alien's original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
并且解释为
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that the beneficiary has made original scientific or scholarly research
contributions to the academic field.
吐血!想必大家都知道如果不是original研究怎么可能发表在期刊会议论文。IO似乎华
丽丽的ignore了我所有7封推荐信。
Final Merits Analysis方面肯定我的材料充足,但是不足以outstanding。质疑文章
review是routine work。质疑我没有editorial position,质疑我是small, elite
group of referees。质疑论文方面的limited citation。因此推论不是
internationally outstanding。