avatar
z*o
1
7月中交的NIW,自己DIY的。 都没到under review的状态 就直接被RFE了, submit
evidence to 1) establish that the beneficiary's activities are of
substantial intrinsic meric; 2) establish that the beneficiary's
contributions will impart national-level benefits; 3) establish that the
beneficiary's past record justifies projectsion of future benefit to the
nation.
背景:5篇journal (4篇一作),引用40+, 审稿10+
我之前的材料已经写的很清楚 不明白为什么会被RFE.
顺便在问一下,这种情况下需要找律师么?
谢谢
avatar
w*n
2
既然DIY不过,建议你还是找专业律师吧。
niw是需要认真论证的。

【在 z****o 的大作中提到】
: 7月中交的NIW,自己DIY的。 都没到under review的状态 就直接被RFE了, submit
: evidence to 1) establish that the beneficiary's activities are of
: substantial intrinsic meric; 2) establish that the beneficiary's
: contributions will impart national-level benefits; 3) establish that the
: beneficiary's past record justifies projectsion of future benefit to the
: nation.
: 背景:5篇journal (4篇一作),引用40+, 审稿10+
: 我之前的材料已经写的很清楚 不明白为什么会被RFE.
: 顺便在问一下,这种情况下需要找律师么?
: 谢谢

avatar
P*I
3
你这niw批复的速度太惊人了。。。。。我等了半年多了,毛都没有。
niw和EB1不一样,不需要meet 3 out of 8 criteria,只要论述对national 有帮助。
评判标准是Three-Prong Test (NYSDOT),如下:
1. The waiver applicant must seek employment in an area that has substantial
intrinsic merit.
2. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that the proposed benefit to be
provided will be national in scope.
3. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that it would be contrary to the
national interest to potentially deprive the prospective employer of the
services of the waiver applicant by making available to U.S. workers the
position sought by the waiver applicant.
希望对LZ有帮助。
avatar
d*u
4

substantial
谢谢分享

【在 P*********I 的大作中提到】
: 你这niw批复的速度太惊人了。。。。。我等了半年多了,毛都没有。
: niw和EB1不一样,不需要meet 3 out of 8 criteria,只要论述对national 有帮助。
: 评判标准是Three-Prong Test (NYSDOT),如下:
: 1. The waiver applicant must seek employment in an area that has substantial
: intrinsic merit.
: 2. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that the proposed benefit to be
: provided will be national in scope.
: 3. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that it would be contrary to the
: national interest to potentially deprive the prospective employer of the
: services of the waiver applicant by making available to U.S. workers the

avatar
l*r
5
niw和eb1很不一样的
你不会直接把eb1的pl改了改交上去的吧。。
avatar
c*3
6
Exceptional Ability 需要3 of 6

substantial

【在 P*********I 的大作中提到】
: 你这niw批复的速度太惊人了。。。。。我等了半年多了,毛都没有。
: niw和EB1不一样,不需要meet 3 out of 8 criteria,只要论述对national 有帮助。
: 评判标准是Three-Prong Test (NYSDOT),如下:
: 1. The waiver applicant must seek employment in an area that has substantial
: intrinsic merit.
: 2. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that the proposed benefit to be
: provided will be national in scope.
: 3. The waiver applicant must demonstrate that it would be contrary to the
: national interest to potentially deprive the prospective employer of the
: services of the waiver applicant by making available to U.S. workers the

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。