从485inventory看,EB1 19财年有current的可能 或者 排期最多2# Immigration - 落地生根
R*t
1 楼
转自trackitt一个烙印的分析 供各位参考
https://www.uscis.gov/greencard/pending-employment-based-i-485-inventory
原帖 https://www.trackitt.com/usa-discussion-forums/i485-eb/1895826403/eb1-
retrogression/page/1
Total worldwide EB1 485 pending: around 42k
India: around 14k
China: around 5k
ROW- 21k
Philippines: 224
Mexico: 1488
Now, Jan 2017 inventory was very similar: Total EB1 - 41k
India: around 13k
China: around 6k
ROW: 19k
Philippines: 146
Mexico: 1465
These numbers include dependants also.
They made EB1 current in Oct 2017 for 6 months. If the numbers are not that
different during Jan 2017 Vs Jan 2018, why introduce a worldwide
retrogression for EB1 in 2018? Between Jan 2018 and now, India and China
would have very little EB1 485 applications due to retrogression. ROW doesn
’t abuse EB1C like India, and there can’t be so much increase in
categories EB1-A and B, especially since the NSC and TSC standards for these
categories are becoming close to impossible with very low approval rates
compared to past years. EB4 and 5 also do not appear to have drastic change
between 2017 and 2018, so spillover from these categories shouldn’t change
much. So, what changed to bring about this worldwide EB1 retrogression? Any
thoughts on this?
以下是我个人分析,请各位拍砖
就算吃不到ROW的spill over. 16-17年的5K EB1A 2年就可以消化掉,毕竟中国每年可
以分到2K8 visa numbers. 以目前的形势,mainland China 18年也基本就是前4个月有
交485的,数字应该不多。我知道有不少人懊悔心疼485的申请费没有concurrent file
的。 所以3年排期应该是封顶了(假定未来3年都悲催的吃不到ROW spill over)。如果
能迟到ROW spill over, 只排1年左右可能性大。
谢谢大家
https://www.uscis.gov/greencard/pending-employment-based-i-485-inventory
原帖 https://www.trackitt.com/usa-discussion-forums/i485-eb/1895826403/eb1-
retrogression/page/1
Total worldwide EB1 485 pending: around 42k
India: around 14k
China: around 5k
ROW- 21k
Philippines: 224
Mexico: 1488
Now, Jan 2017 inventory was very similar: Total EB1 - 41k
India: around 13k
China: around 6k
ROW: 19k
Philippines: 146
Mexico: 1465
These numbers include dependants also.
They made EB1 current in Oct 2017 for 6 months. If the numbers are not that
different during Jan 2017 Vs Jan 2018, why introduce a worldwide
retrogression for EB1 in 2018? Between Jan 2018 and now, India and China
would have very little EB1 485 applications due to retrogression. ROW doesn
’t abuse EB1C like India, and there can’t be so much increase in
categories EB1-A and B, especially since the NSC and TSC standards for these
categories are becoming close to impossible with very low approval rates
compared to past years. EB4 and 5 also do not appear to have drastic change
between 2017 and 2018, so spillover from these categories shouldn’t change
much. So, what changed to bring about this worldwide EB1 retrogression? Any
thoughts on this?
以下是我个人分析,请各位拍砖
就算吃不到ROW的spill over. 16-17年的5K EB1A 2年就可以消化掉,毕竟中国每年可
以分到2K8 visa numbers. 以目前的形势,mainland China 18年也基本就是前4个月有
交485的,数字应该不多。我知道有不少人懊悔心疼485的申请费没有concurrent file
的。 所以3年排期应该是封顶了(假定未来3年都悲催的吃不到ROW spill over)。如果
能迟到ROW spill over, 只排1年左右可能性大。
谢谢大家