tsc-eb1a 收到模板 rfe (XM1506), 求建议# Immigration - 落地生根
t*8
1 楼
背景:
Field: Computational and Physical Chemistry
Paper: 6 Journal (5 first author) + 3 Conference
GS Citation: 117 when filed, now 147
收到了模板RFE, 要求的内容如下:
1. Translations regarding documents in a Foreign Language
不知道为什么提到中文文章的翻译,所有的东西都是英文的，并没有提交任何中文的材
料（只有BS的学位证是中文的，但也附上了学校官方的translation）。请问大家遇到
过这种情况吗？是否是模板RFE的标准配置？应该如何回复？
2. Documentation to establish that the beneficiary will continue to work in
their claimed area of expertise．
当时还在postdoc,提交了postdoc的offer letter和research plan. 但是现在已到工业
界做data scientist，有点担心field的问题。律师说可以将现在的工作和原来的经历
还有skill set联系起来，在公司的support letter和个人的future research plan也
提及这些,不知道这样是否足够？大家有什么其他的建议吗？
3. Contributions of major significance in tile field
'This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not
show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. Although the petitioner's work has
been described as important, novel, and valuable, the evidence does not
appear to indicate that the petitioner's contribution are of major
significance. To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's
contribution are original and of major significance in the field, the
petitioner mat submit:
• Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the
beneficiary's contribution to the field.
• Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary's work important. ,
• Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance.
• Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contribution(s)
has provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely
cited.
• Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others.
Possible evidence may
include but is not limited to:
o Contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products;
o Licensed technology being used by others;
o Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about the beneficiary's contribution and must explain, in detail,
how the contribution Was "original" (not merely replicating the work of
others) and how they were of"major" significance. General statements
regarding the importance of the endeavors which are not supported by
documentary evidence are insufficient.'
感觉是模板回复，准备材料时律师表示最近发现回复RFE时一堆推荐信其实没什么用，
建议用verification letters from people who used your work。不知道这样是否靠
谱？感觉在RFE中补推荐信还是主流阿。
此外IO是XM1506,在版上没有找到这个IO，请问有朋友碰到过这个IO吗？
谢谢大家
Field: Computational and Physical Chemistry
Paper: 6 Journal (5 first author) + 3 Conference
GS Citation: 117 when filed, now 147
收到了模板RFE, 要求的内容如下:
1. Translations regarding documents in a Foreign Language
不知道为什么提到中文文章的翻译,所有的东西都是英文的，并没有提交任何中文的材
料（只有BS的学位证是中文的，但也附上了学校官方的translation）。请问大家遇到
过这种情况吗？是否是模板RFE的标准配置？应该如何回复？
2. Documentation to establish that the beneficiary will continue to work in
their claimed area of expertise．
当时还在postdoc,提交了postdoc的offer letter和research plan. 但是现在已到工业
界做data scientist，有点担心field的问题。律师说可以将现在的工作和原来的经历
还有skill set联系起来，在公司的support letter和个人的future research plan也
提及这些,不知道这样是否足够？大家有什么其他的建议吗？
3. Contributions of major significance in tile field
'This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not
show
that the beneficiary's contributions are considered to be of major
significance in the field of endeavor. Although the petitioner's work has
been described as important, novel, and valuable, the evidence does not
appear to indicate that the petitioner's contribution are of major
significance. To assist in determining whether the beneficiary's
contribution are original and of major significance in the field, the
petitioner mat submit:
• Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the
beneficiary's contribution to the field.
• Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider the beneficiary's work important. ,
• Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the
beneficiary's contributions of major significance.
• Evidence that the beneficiary's major significant contribution(s)
has provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely
cited.
• Evidence of the beneficiary's work being implemented by others.
Possible evidence may
include but is not limited to:
o Contracts with companies using the beneficiary's products;
o Licensed technology being used by others;
o Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
Note: Letters and testimonies, if submitted, must provide as much detail as
possible about the beneficiary's contribution and must explain, in detail,
how the contribution Was "original" (not merely replicating the work of
others) and how they were of"major" significance. General statements
regarding the importance of the endeavors which are not supported by
documentary evidence are insufficient.'
感觉是模板回复，准备材料时律师表示最近发现回复RFE时一堆推荐信其实没什么用，
建议用verification letters from people who used your work。不知道这样是否靠
谱？感觉在RFE中补推荐信还是主流阿。
此外IO是XM1506,在版上没有找到这个IO，请问有朋友碰到过这个IO吗？
谢谢大家
