avatar
new in JSP 2.0 spec# Java - 爪哇娇娃
j*1
1
【 以下文字转载自 Complain 讨论区 】
发信人: mitbbs (未名空间), 信区: Complain
标 题: Re: [投诉]TrustinJesus版主Dignity两天之内狂删我19篇主题帖
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue Jun 28 02:58:38 2011, 美东)
由于版内炸版,会引起误删。版主可恢复其误删的帖子
avatar
f*o
2
expression language, so that you can write scripts like ${foo.bar}.
those are supposed not java, but 'simpler' language for page authors.
SimpleTag or 'tag file'. the taglib can be implemented in JSP syntax,
not have to be in a java class. this is a lot easier.
SimpleTag is decoupled from servlet context, so that it 'COULD' be
used as template page independently in 'FUTURE'. I want this badly,
but still it's not available.
avatar
m*t
3
I haven't read the spec yet. Seems it absorbed a lot of stuff
from Velocity, eh?

【在 f***o 的大作中提到】
: expression language, so that you can write scripts like ${foo.bar}.
: those are supposed not java, but 'simpler' language for page authors.
: SimpleTag or 'tag file'. the taglib can be implemented in JSP syntax,
: not have to be in a java class. this is a lot easier.
: SimpleTag is decoupled from servlet context, so that it 'COULD' be
: used as template page independently in 'FUTURE'. I want this badly,
: but still it's not available.

avatar
f*o
4
apache group has quite some influence, but i don't think velocity is big deal.
(1) is driven by persistent request to cleanly seperate developers and
authors. if you ask me, screw page authors then fire them.
(2) is a correction to the previous design mistake. i don't think they were
too stupid to forsee the problem, probably no enough resource at the time.
(3) is not quite clear - seems they intend to decouple template from servelt,
but it's still not done yet, just a gesture. ahh...

【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
: I haven't read the spec yet. Seems it absorbed a lot of stuff
: from Velocity, eh?

相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。