人类历史上最伟大的10本书 (转载)# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
g*i
1 楼
RD 6/23, RFE 7/6 by #XM1155. Claim Authorship + Performing a Critical Role +
Contribution. Authorship 和 Contribution 过了,Critical Role 没过。
BACKGROUND: 船舶工程美国PHD;PHD毕业后在一家中小型船厂做SENIOR NAVAL
ARCHITECT,为此船厂设计了一个浮船坞,并用此浮船坞将该厂建造的美国历史上最大
豪华游艇送下水。
IO承认了我的浮船坞及LAUNCH豪华游艇的 CONTRIBUTIONS,但没认我由此CLAIM的在该
厂Performing a Critical Role, 让提交证据,RFE信上这样写的:
To assist in derterming that the beneficiary has performed in a leading or
critical role for xxx shipyards, the petitioner may submit:
Letters from current or former employer(s) or trainer(s) with personal
knowledge of the significance of the beneficiary's leading or critical role:
1, the letters should contain detailed and probative information that
specially addresses how the beneficiary's role for the organization is or
was leading or critical. Details should include the specific tasks or
accomplishments of the beneficiary as compared to others who are employed in
similar pursuits within the field of endeavor; and
2, The letters should include the name, address,and title of the writer.
工科实在不好在CITATION和REVIEW上比,又是“三无”人员,幸运被船厂OWNER兼
PRESIDENT重用,才得以CLAIM三条。在本版潜水三余月,也没见有走Critical Role的
,无奈当回“出头鸟”!
我的求助问题是:
1)这个Letter from employer是不是指现任的能代表船厂的高级管理人员写的信,比
如已跳槽的工程部MANAGER写是不是不行?HR头写,行不行?
2)其实我附有OWNER兼PRESIDENT的这样的推荐信,IO应该是没时间而漏看。因他的信
还兼顾我的CONTRIBUTION,没有与同行比较(compared to others who are employed
in similar pursuits),可不可以重提交一封他的针对以上内容的LETTER OF SUPPORT?
希望大家给给建议、主意。谢了先!
并期望此次能投石问路,为广大工科EB1A有志者辟条别路。
Contribution. Authorship 和 Contribution 过了,Critical Role 没过。
BACKGROUND: 船舶工程美国PHD;PHD毕业后在一家中小型船厂做SENIOR NAVAL
ARCHITECT,为此船厂设计了一个浮船坞,并用此浮船坞将该厂建造的美国历史上最大
豪华游艇送下水。
IO承认了我的浮船坞及LAUNCH豪华游艇的 CONTRIBUTIONS,但没认我由此CLAIM的在该
厂Performing a Critical Role, 让提交证据,RFE信上这样写的:
To assist in derterming that the beneficiary has performed in a leading or
critical role for xxx shipyards, the petitioner may submit:
Letters from current or former employer(s) or trainer(s) with personal
knowledge of the significance of the beneficiary's leading or critical role:
1, the letters should contain detailed and probative information that
specially addresses how the beneficiary's role for the organization is or
was leading or critical. Details should include the specific tasks or
accomplishments of the beneficiary as compared to others who are employed in
similar pursuits within the field of endeavor; and
2, The letters should include the name, address,and title of the writer.
工科实在不好在CITATION和REVIEW上比,又是“三无”人员,幸运被船厂OWNER兼
PRESIDENT重用,才得以CLAIM三条。在本版潜水三余月,也没见有走Critical Role的
,无奈当回“出头鸟”!
我的求助问题是:
1)这个Letter from employer是不是指现任的能代表船厂的高级管理人员写的信,比
如已跳槽的工程部MANAGER写是不是不行?HR头写,行不行?
2)其实我附有OWNER兼PRESIDENT的这样的推荐信,IO应该是没时间而漏看。因他的信
还兼顾我的CONTRIBUTION,没有与同行比较(compared to others who are employed
in similar pursuits),可不可以重提交一封他的针对以上内容的LETTER OF SUPPORT?
希望大家给给建议、主意。谢了先!
并期望此次能投石问路,为广大工科EB1A有志者辟条别路。