p*g
2 楼
我有一封推荐信，我的一个二作 conference presentation 里有他的名字,这还能算
independent不？
或者我直接把这个 conference presentation 拿掉？
independent不？
或者我直接把这个 conference presentation 拿掉？
w*i
3 楼
如果这个过了,未来几年的EB只给印度人......
http://www.trackitt.com/uk-discussion-forums/i765/740339151/ead
to karthik811:
3% chances only after a day bill was introduced and this is based on
statistics, As and when it gets more co-sponsors from both of the parties
its chances will increase and their are others related bills are proposed in
both House and Senate and eventually they will be merged into a single bill
which can sail smoothly in both parts of the congress and can reach Ob's
desk.
So now most important thing for us is to contact our Congressman/Senators
and urge them to support this.
I created a sample email, experts on this forum can improve it.
For Democratic Congressman,
Dear Sir,
I'm resident of your district and I'm glad for your support to Mr. President
's Executive Actions to improve immigration system and economy. Also as
President said Legislative actions can provide permanent solutions to
nations immigration system related issues, I too support H.R. 213 (To amend
the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the per-country numerical
limitation for employment-based immigrants, to increase the per-country
numerical limitation for family-sponsored immigrants, and for other purposes
), recently introduced in the US house of representatives. I hope you too
will support this bill to pass in the congress and become the law of the
nation. I appreciate your help for the immigration cause and concerns about
your constituents and your service to this great nation.
Thanks and Regards.
and for Republican Congressman:
Dear Sir,
I'm resident of your district and I'm glad for your opposition to President'
s Executive Actions on immigration and your support for legislative solution
to improve immigration system and improve border security.
And for that reason I support H.R. 213 (To amend the Immigration and
Nationality Act to eliminate the per-country numerical limitation for
employment-based immigrants, to increase the per-country numerical
limitation for family-sponsored immigrants, and for other purposes),
recently introduced in the US house of representatives. I hope you too will
support this bill to pass in the congress and become the law of the nation.
I appreciate your help for the immigration cause and concerns about your
constituents and your service to this great nation.
Thanks and Regards.
http://www.trackitt.com/uk-discussion-forums/i765/740339151/ead
to karthik811:
3% chances only after a day bill was introduced and this is based on
statistics, As and when it gets more co-sponsors from both of the parties
its chances will increase and their are others related bills are proposed in
both House and Senate and eventually they will be merged into a single bill
which can sail smoothly in both parts of the congress and can reach Ob's
desk.
So now most important thing for us is to contact our Congressman/Senators
and urge them to support this.
I created a sample email, experts on this forum can improve it.
For Democratic Congressman,
Dear Sir,
I'm resident of your district and I'm glad for your support to Mr. President
's Executive Actions to improve immigration system and economy. Also as
President said Legislative actions can provide permanent solutions to
nations immigration system related issues, I too support H.R. 213 (To amend
the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the per-country numerical
limitation for employment-based immigrants, to increase the per-country
numerical limitation for family-sponsored immigrants, and for other purposes
), recently introduced in the US house of representatives. I hope you too
will support this bill to pass in the congress and become the law of the
nation. I appreciate your help for the immigration cause and concerns about
your constituents and your service to this great nation.
Thanks and Regards.
and for Republican Congressman:
Dear Sir,
I'm resident of your district and I'm glad for your opposition to President'
s Executive Actions on immigration and your support for legislative solution
to improve immigration system and improve border security.
And for that reason I support H.R. 213 (To amend the Immigration and
Nationality Act to eliminate the per-country numerical limitation for
employment-based immigrants, to increase the per-country numerical
limitation for family-sponsored immigrants, and for other purposes),
recently introduced in the US house of representatives. I hope you too will
support this bill to pass in the congress and become the law of the nation.
I appreciate your help for the immigration cause and concerns about your
constituents and your service to this great nation.
Thanks and Regards.
c*7
4 楼
坑爹啊。。。
K*M
5 楼
不算。
k*k
6 楼
不得不佩服，烙印组织真是能折腾
l*o
7 楼
切换的太牛了
p*g
8 楼
我能不能把有他名字的 conference presentation 拿掉，不提这个。算不算作弊？他
在信里说了不认识我。
【在 K***M 的大作中提到】
: 不算。
在信里说了不认识我。
【在 K***M 的大作中提到】
: 不算。
w*i
9 楼
靠,真是一个脑残的bill阿...不增加EB,反而取消国别限制.这是烙印不好过谁也别好过
的节奏么?
01/09/2015: Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah Quietly Reintroduced Former H.R.
3012 in New H.R. 213 Yesterday
Yesterday, the Congressman introduced in the House H.R. 213. "A bill to
amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the per-country
numerical limitation for employment-based immigrants, to increase the per-
country numerical limitation for family-sponsored immigrants, and for other
purposes" which was forwarded to the Committee on the Judiciary. The bill
was and is cosponsored by Demoratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California. It is
also co-sponsored by Republican Rep. Labrador of Idaho. Rep. Lofgren
previously agreed to co-sponsor the previous controversial bill of H.R. 3012
on compromise to provide increase of per country numerical limitation for
family-based immigration system, which is a Democratic legislative platform.
Readers may recall that this bill was successful to pass the House and
reached the Senate where Irish immigration bill was added and Sen. Grassley
opposed to the passage. After a struggle, the Senate had almost compromised
with Sen. Grassley, but eventually never made into a legislation. Now the
same bill is back, probably without the Irish E-3 visa proposal and as a
114th Congress' new bill of H.R. 213. The text has yet to be made available.
As soon as it is available, we will post it at this site.
in
bill
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: 如果这个过了,未来几年的EB只给印度人......
: http://www.trackitt.com/uk-discussion-forums/i765/740339151/ead
: to karthik811:
: 3% chances only after a day bill was introduced and this is based on
: statistics, As and when it gets more co-sponsors from both of the parties
: its chances will increase and their are others related bills are proposed in
: both House and Senate and eventually they will be merged into a single bill
: which can sail smoothly in both parts of the congress and can reach Ob's
: desk.
: So now most important thing for us is to contact our Congressman/Senators
的节奏么?
01/09/2015: Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah Quietly Reintroduced Former H.R.
3012 in New H.R. 213 Yesterday
Yesterday, the Congressman introduced in the House H.R. 213. "A bill to
amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the per-country
numerical limitation for employment-based immigrants, to increase the per-
country numerical limitation for family-sponsored immigrants, and for other
purposes" which was forwarded to the Committee on the Judiciary. The bill
was and is cosponsored by Demoratic Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California. It is
also co-sponsored by Republican Rep. Labrador of Idaho. Rep. Lofgren
previously agreed to co-sponsor the previous controversial bill of H.R. 3012
on compromise to provide increase of per country numerical limitation for
family-based immigration system, which is a Democratic legislative platform.
Readers may recall that this bill was successful to pass the House and
reached the Senate where Irish immigration bill was added and Sen. Grassley
opposed to the passage. After a struggle, the Senate had almost compromised
with Sen. Grassley, but eventually never made into a legislation. Now the
same bill is back, probably without the Irish E-3 visa proposal and as a
114th Congress' new bill of H.R. 213. The text has yet to be made available.
As soon as it is available, we will post it at this site.
in
bill
【在 w********i 的大作中提到】
: 如果这个过了,未来几年的EB只给印度人......
: http://www.trackitt.com/uk-discussion-forums/i765/740339151/ead
: to karthik811:
: 3% chances only after a day bill was introduced and this is based on
: statistics, As and when it gets more co-sponsors from both of the parties
: its chances will increase and their are others related bills are proposed in
: both House and Senate and eventually they will be merged into a single bill
: which can sail smoothly in both parts of the congress and can reach Ob's
: desk.
: So now most important thing for us is to contact our Congressman/Senators
g*n
10 楼
哈哈，这个给力
K*M
11 楼
不算作弊。IO发现的可能性也不大。
x*l
12 楼
有什么恶心的？如果真是通过了除了烙印受益，再就是老中受益了。
r*e
13 楼
这个很老了....
【在 c*******7 的大作中提到】
: 坑爹啊。。。
【在 c*******7 的大作中提到】
: 坑爹啊。。。
p*g
14 楼
谢谢拉。
【在 K***M 的大作中提到】
: 不算作弊。IO发现的可能性也不大。
【在 K***M 的大作中提到】
: 不算作弊。IO发现的可能性也不大。
b*e
15 楼
等老中喝到汤地球早就爆炸了
【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
: 有什么恶心的？如果真是通过了除了烙印受益，再就是老中受益了。
【在 x**l 的大作中提到】
: 有什么恶心的？如果真是通过了除了烙印受益，再就是老中受益了。
i*l
16 楼
假的吧？
n*p
17 楼
算作弊，但是IO发现的可能性很小。
【在 p*******g 的大作中提到】
: 我能不能把有他名字的 conference presentation 拿掉，不提这个。算不算作弊？他
: 在信里说了不认识我。
【在 p*******g 的大作中提到】
: 我能不能把有他名字的 conference presentation 拿掉，不提这个。算不算作弊？他
: 在信里说了不认识我。
h*e
18 楼
re
烙印每年H1B 7倍于老中，现在排期还在远古，只有增加EB名额才是王道，没有名额的
保障，老中怎么喝汤呐？
【在 b*****e 的大作中提到】
: 等老中喝到汤地球早就爆炸了
烙印每年H1B 7倍于老中，现在排期还在远古，只有增加EB名额才是王道，没有名额的
保障，老中怎么喝汤呐？
【在 b*****e 的大作中提到】
: 等老中喝到汤地球早就爆炸了
w*i
19 楼
提高国别limit.这样中国可以收益.否则只有烙印收益,全世界其他国家全受损.
如果提高EB名额+取消国别limit, 短期看大家收益都C,长期看还是烙印收益,其它国受
损...前提是烙印的EB以后都远大于其他国.
如果提高EB名额+取消国别limit, 短期看大家收益都C,长期看还是烙印收益,其它国受
损...前提是烙印的EB以后都远大于其他国.
相关阅读