Redian新闻
>
9天还差9万个签名:歧视中国人不需要道歉? (转载)
avatar
9天还差9万个签名:歧视中国人不需要道歉? (转载)# Joke - 肚皮舞运动
a*7
1
【 以下文字转载自 LeisureTime 讨论区 】
发信人: airdragon77 (仍然自由自我永远高唱我歌), 信区: LeisureTime
标 题: 9天还差9万个签名:歧视中国人不需要道歉?
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Apr 12 00:18:33 2013, 美东)
原来的url太长,点了出错
http://tinyurl.com/d5zuuxf
WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO:
apologize for the Chinese exclusion laws and reaffirm that the greatness of
our nation was built on inclusion.
The 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act and a series of laws represented more than 60
years of harsh legislation targeting Chinese for physical and political
exclusion. They explicitly barred Chnese from immigration and citizenship
and became a "Barred Zone" to exclude all Asians. The laws established the
confrontational character of the execution of immgration laws up to today.
Despite hardships and discrimination, generations of Chinese Americans
helped build the first transcontinental railroad, fought in wars to defend
the nation, and contributed to every segment of American society.
The State of California apologized for its anti-Chinese laws. The US Senate
and House issued resolutions of regret. Only the President has not closed
this shameful chapter in American history with an apology.
Created: Mar 21, 2013
Issues: Civil Rights and Liberties, Education, Immigration
avatar
a*7
2
3044

of
60

【在 a*********7 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 LeisureTime 讨论区 】
: 发信人: airdragon77 (仍然自由自我永远高唱我歌), 信区: LeisureTime
: 标 题: 9天还差9万个签名:歧视中国人不需要道歉?
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Fri Apr 12 00:18:33 2013, 美东)
: 原来的url太长,点了出错
: http://tinyurl.com/d5zuuxf
: WE PETITION THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION TO:
: apologize for the Chinese exclusion laws and reaffirm that the greatness of
: our nation was built on inclusion.
: The 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act and a series of laws represented more than 60

avatar
a*7
3
3096

of
60

【在 a*********7 的大作中提到】
: 3044
:
: of
: 60

avatar
b*a
4
严肃请求解惑,不是早就道歉过了吗?
avatar
a*7
5
刚刚在军版也有人这么说,不是你吧? :)
谁了解的,科普一下,我也不用折腾了。。。

【在 b*****a 的大作中提到】
: 严肃请求解惑,不是早就道歉过了吗?
avatar
R*d
6
asking for the president

【在 b*****a 的大作中提到】
: 严肃请求解惑,不是早就道歉过了吗?
avatar
b*a
7
不是我
wikipedia is your friend:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act#Repeal_and_c
On June 18, 2012, the United States House of Representatives passed a
resolution introduced by Congresswoman Judy Chu, that formally expresses the
regret of the House of Representatives for the Chinese Exclusion Act, which
imposed almost total restrictions on Chinese immigration and naturalization
and denied Chinese-Americans basic freedoms because of their ethnicity.
This was only the fourth time that the U.S. Congress issued an apology to a
group of people.[22]

【在 a*********7 的大作中提到】
: 刚刚在军版也有人这么说,不是你吧? :)
: 谁了解的,科普一下,我也不用折腾了。。。

avatar
b*a
8
这是国会通过的法律,当然是国会道歉

【在 R******d 的大作中提到】
: asking for the president
avatar
a*7
9
对,刚刚军版也贴过了:
------------------------------
汗。。。
原来现在这个petition最后一段也提到了:
The State of California apologized for its anti-Chinese laws. The US Senate
and House issued resolutions of regret. Only the President has not closed
this shameful chapter in American history with an apology.
现在就是要总统道歉。呃,我也不知道意义有多大

the
which
naturalization
a
avatar
b*e
10
奥黑闲着也是闲着,让它干点活

Senate

【在 a*********7 的大作中提到】
: 对,刚刚军版也贴过了:
: ------------------------------
: 汗。。。
: 原来现在这个petition最后一段也提到了:
: The State of California apologized for its anti-Chinese laws. The US Senate
: and House issued resolutions of regret. Only the President has not closed
: this shameful chapter in American history with an apology.
: 现在就是要总统道歉。呃,我也不知道意义有多大
:
: the

avatar
R*a
11
国会道过谦了,白宫还没有。可能下次要求最高法院道歉

【在 b*****a 的大作中提到】
: 严肃请求解惑,不是早就道歉过了吗?
avatar
M*n
12
一个总统道歉一次

【在 R***a 的大作中提到】
: 国会道过谦了,白宫还没有。可能下次要求最高法院道歉
avatar
H*7
13
每年一次

【在 M******n 的大作中提到】
: 一个总统道歉一次
avatar
H*7
14
国会是橡皮图章,不算,要两党总书记道歉

【在 R***a 的大作中提到】
: 国会道过谦了,白宫还没有。可能下次要求最高法院道歉
avatar
z*3
15
算了,还是让女王来道歉吧

【在 H******7 的大作中提到】
: 国会是橡皮图章,不算,要两党总书记道歉
avatar
d*f
16
en,然后让全美国人民道歉,还有墨西哥,阿甘亭,巴西

【在 R***a 的大作中提到】
: 国会道过谦了,白宫还没有。可能下次要求最高法院道歉
avatar
l*y
17
什么屁事。没实力道个屁歉
相关阅读
logo
联系我们隐私协议©2024 redian.news
Redian新闻
Redian.news刊载任何文章,不代表同意其说法或描述,仅为提供更多信息,也不构成任何建议。文章信息的合法性及真实性由其作者负责,与Redian.news及其运营公司无关。欢迎投稿,如发现稿件侵权,或作者不愿在本网发表文章,请版权拥有者通知本网处理。